建筑设计中基于循环的隐含碳性能:指数开发和循环倡议

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mohsen Ahmadi , Asal Pournaghshband , Farzad Piadeh , M. Reza Hosseini
{"title":"建筑设计中基于循环的隐含碳性能:指数开发和循环倡议","authors":"Mohsen Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Asal Pournaghshband ,&nbsp;Farzad Piadeh ,&nbsp;M. Reza Hosseini","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces the Circularity-based Embodied Carbon (CiBEC) index, a comparative metric designed to assess the effects of circular actions on the embodied carbon (EC) of building projects. Built upon the conventional EC measurement, this index enhances traditional approaches by incorporating inclusive material inflow and outflow allocations, acknowledging variations in usage intensity, and factoring in potential changes to building lifespan strategies. Unlike conventional methods, it also recognises the collective efforts of all stakeholders - including third-party contributors - by fairly redistributing carbon savings across product (A) and beyond the building (D) phases of the life cycle assessment, offering a more holistic and equitable perspective. While demonstrated on a global scale, the index is applied to a real office building project to validate its practicality and demonstrate real-world applicability. Both individual and combined circular scenarios are assessed, revealing how key benefits from circular initiatives - often unaccounted for in conventional methods - are effectively captured through the CiBEC framework. The results indicate that among the eight developed circular scenarios, two - specifically, renovation and the multi-use of building spaces - are identified as EC-intensive. In contrast, the remaining scenarios achieve reductions of up to only 10 % when the conventional approach is used. However, when assessed using the CiBEC method, the “renovation” scenario notably demonstrates a 36 % reduction. Furthermore, the study shows that integrating various circular strategies through the development of seven combined scenarios can lead to substantial EC reductions, decreasing the initial EC from 629 to 191 kgCO<sub>2</sub> eq./m<sup>2</sup>. This significant reduction is not achieved through a simple statistical aggregation but through the complex interactions among the different strategies. Therefore, it seems that while the CiBEC index is most effective during the early design stages, it also allows project stakeholders to refine and monitor EC reduction throughout the project's lifecycle.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"518 ","pages":"Article 145909"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Circularity-based embodied carbon performance in building design: Index development and circular initiatives\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Ahmadi ,&nbsp;Asal Pournaghshband ,&nbsp;Farzad Piadeh ,&nbsp;M. Reza Hosseini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study introduces the Circularity-based Embodied Carbon (CiBEC) index, a comparative metric designed to assess the effects of circular actions on the embodied carbon (EC) of building projects. Built upon the conventional EC measurement, this index enhances traditional approaches by incorporating inclusive material inflow and outflow allocations, acknowledging variations in usage intensity, and factoring in potential changes to building lifespan strategies. Unlike conventional methods, it also recognises the collective efforts of all stakeholders - including third-party contributors - by fairly redistributing carbon savings across product (A) and beyond the building (D) phases of the life cycle assessment, offering a more holistic and equitable perspective. While demonstrated on a global scale, the index is applied to a real office building project to validate its practicality and demonstrate real-world applicability. Both individual and combined circular scenarios are assessed, revealing how key benefits from circular initiatives - often unaccounted for in conventional methods - are effectively captured through the CiBEC framework. The results indicate that among the eight developed circular scenarios, two - specifically, renovation and the multi-use of building spaces - are identified as EC-intensive. In contrast, the remaining scenarios achieve reductions of up to only 10 % when the conventional approach is used. However, when assessed using the CiBEC method, the “renovation” scenario notably demonstrates a 36 % reduction. Furthermore, the study shows that integrating various circular strategies through the development of seven combined scenarios can lead to substantial EC reductions, decreasing the initial EC from 629 to 191 kgCO<sub>2</sub> eq./m<sup>2</sup>. This significant reduction is not achieved through a simple statistical aggregation but through the complex interactions among the different strategies. Therefore, it seems that while the CiBEC index is most effective during the early design stages, it also allows project stakeholders to refine and monitor EC reduction throughout the project's lifecycle.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"volume\":\"518 \",\"pages\":\"Article 145909\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cleaner Production\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625012594\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625012594","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究引入了基于循环的隐含碳(CiBEC)指数,这是一个比较指标,旨在评估循环行为对建筑项目隐含碳(EC)的影响。该指数建立在传统EC测量的基础上,通过纳入包容性材料流入和流出分配,承认使用强度的变化,并考虑到建筑寿命策略的潜在变化,从而增强了传统方法。与传统方法不同,它还通过在产品(A)和建筑(D)生命周期评估阶段之间公平地重新分配碳节约,从而认可所有利益相关者(包括第三方贡献者)的集体努力,提供更全面和公平的视角。在全球范围内进行论证的同时,将该指数应用于一个实际的办公建筑项目,以验证其实用性和现实世界的适用性。对单个和组合的循环方案进行了评估,揭示了如何通过CiBEC框架有效地捕获循环倡议的主要好处——这些好处通常在传统方法中没有考虑到。结果表明,在八个已开发的循环方案中,有两个-具体而言,改造和建筑空间的多用途-被确定为ec密集型。相比之下,当使用常规方法时,其余方案最多只能减少10%。然而,当使用CiBEC方法进行评估时,“改造”方案显着显示减少了36%。此外,该研究表明,通过开发7种组合情景来整合各种循环策略可以导致大量的EC减少,将初始EC从629降低到191 kgCO2当量/m2。这种显著的减少不是通过简单的统计聚合实现的,而是通过不同策略之间复杂的相互作用实现的。因此,虽然CiBEC指数在早期设计阶段最有效,但它也允许项目利益相关者在整个项目生命周期中改进和监控EC减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Circularity-based embodied carbon performance in building design: Index development and circular initiatives

Circularity-based embodied carbon performance in building design: Index development and circular initiatives

Circularity-based embodied carbon performance in building design: Index development and circular initiatives
This study introduces the Circularity-based Embodied Carbon (CiBEC) index, a comparative metric designed to assess the effects of circular actions on the embodied carbon (EC) of building projects. Built upon the conventional EC measurement, this index enhances traditional approaches by incorporating inclusive material inflow and outflow allocations, acknowledging variations in usage intensity, and factoring in potential changes to building lifespan strategies. Unlike conventional methods, it also recognises the collective efforts of all stakeholders - including third-party contributors - by fairly redistributing carbon savings across product (A) and beyond the building (D) phases of the life cycle assessment, offering a more holistic and equitable perspective. While demonstrated on a global scale, the index is applied to a real office building project to validate its practicality and demonstrate real-world applicability. Both individual and combined circular scenarios are assessed, revealing how key benefits from circular initiatives - often unaccounted for in conventional methods - are effectively captured through the CiBEC framework. The results indicate that among the eight developed circular scenarios, two - specifically, renovation and the multi-use of building spaces - are identified as EC-intensive. In contrast, the remaining scenarios achieve reductions of up to only 10 % when the conventional approach is used. However, when assessed using the CiBEC method, the “renovation” scenario notably demonstrates a 36 % reduction. Furthermore, the study shows that integrating various circular strategies through the development of seven combined scenarios can lead to substantial EC reductions, decreasing the initial EC from 629 to 191 kgCO2 eq./m2. This significant reduction is not achieved through a simple statistical aggregation but through the complex interactions among the different strategies. Therefore, it seems that while the CiBEC index is most effective during the early design stages, it also allows project stakeholders to refine and monitor EC reduction throughout the project's lifecycle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信