适合你vs.适合所有人:算法个性化在推动社交媒体参与方面的有效性

IF 8.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Cynthia A. Dekker, Susanne E. Baumgartner, Sindy R. Sumter
{"title":"适合你vs.适合所有人:算法个性化在推动社交媒体参与方面的有效性","authors":"Cynthia A. Dekker,&nbsp;Susanne E. Baumgartner,&nbsp;Sindy R. Sumter","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Social media platforms increasingly use algorithmic personalization, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled usage. However, these concerns remain partly speculative as evidence for the effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving user engagement is limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how TikTok users’ behavior and experiences would change if their feeds were no longer personalized based on their interests. In this preregistered study, 88 TikTok users participated in a two-week within-subjects design: a baseline week (default highly personalized feed), followed by an experimental week (less personalized feed). Daily experiences were assessed through daily surveys, and objective TikTok usage data was obtained through screenshots. We found that both daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased, self-regulation increased, and participants derived less enjoyment from their use. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic personalization in sustaining user engagement and suggest that reducing feed personalization may be a promising, though currently limited, approach to address uncontrolled social media use.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"101 ","pages":"Article 102300"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"For you vs. for everyone: The effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving social media engagement\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia A. Dekker,&nbsp;Susanne E. Baumgartner,&nbsp;Sindy R. Sumter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2025.102300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Social media platforms increasingly use algorithmic personalization, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled usage. However, these concerns remain partly speculative as evidence for the effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving user engagement is limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how TikTok users’ behavior and experiences would change if their feeds were no longer personalized based on their interests. In this preregistered study, 88 TikTok users participated in a two-week within-subjects design: a baseline week (default highly personalized feed), followed by an experimental week (less personalized feed). Daily experiences were assessed through daily surveys, and objective TikTok usage data was obtained through screenshots. We found that both daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased, self-regulation increased, and participants derived less enjoyment from their use. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic personalization in sustaining user engagement and suggest that reducing feed personalization may be a promising, though currently limited, approach to address uncontrolled social media use.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"101 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000620\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585325000620","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交媒体平台越来越多地使用算法个性化,引发了人们对潜在的不受控制的使用的担忧。然而,这些担忧在一定程度上仍然是推测性的,因为算法个性化在推动用户参与度方面的有效性证据有限。因此,本研究调查了如果TikTok用户的feed不再根据他们的兴趣进行个性化,他们的行为和体验将如何变化。在这项预先注册的研究中,88名TikTok用户参加了为期两周的主题内设计:基线周(默认的高度个性化的消息源),然后是实验周(不那么个性化的消息源)。通过日常调查评估日常体验,通过截图获取客观的TikTok使用数据。我们发现,TikTok的每日使用频率和持续时间都减少了,自我调节能力增强了,参与者从使用中获得的乐趣减少了。这些发现强调了算法个性化在维持用户参与度方面的关键作用,并表明减少feed个性化可能是解决不受控制的社交媒体使用的一种有前途的方法,尽管目前有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
For you vs. for everyone: The effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving social media engagement
Social media platforms increasingly use algorithmic personalization, raising concerns about potential uncontrolled usage. However, these concerns remain partly speculative as evidence for the effectiveness of algorithmic personalization in driving user engagement is limited. Therefore, the present study investigated how TikTok users’ behavior and experiences would change if their feeds were no longer personalized based on their interests. In this preregistered study, 88 TikTok users participated in a two-week within-subjects design: a baseline week (default highly personalized feed), followed by an experimental week (less personalized feed). Daily experiences were assessed through daily surveys, and objective TikTok usage data was obtained through screenshots. We found that both daily frequency and duration of TikTok use decreased, self-regulation increased, and participants derived less enjoyment from their use. These findings highlight the critical role of algorithmic personalization in sustaining user engagement and suggest that reducing feed personalization may be a promising, though currently limited, approach to address uncontrolled social media use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信