Jian Zhang , Yuming Huang , Yuanxin Liu , Na Yang , Jiahai Yuan
{"title":"优化燃煤发电机组战略储备,平衡中国清洁能源转型的可靠性和成本","authors":"Jian Zhang , Yuming Huang , Yuanxin Liu , Na Yang , Jiahai Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The strategic reserve mechanism for coal-fired power units provides a viable policy option to address security concerns in the low-carbon transition of the power system. This paper proposes a strategic reserve selection framework combining Monte Carlo simulation and mixed-integer linear programming to identify optimal reserve units by minimizing the cost per unit reduction in expected energy not served, thereby quantifying the economic efficiency of converting units of different capacities such as 300 MW, 600 MW, and 1000 MW and with service ages ranging from 1 to 30 years into strategic reserves. Simulation results for a representative region in East China indicate that converting 1000 MW units at around 20 years of service age yields the best economic benefits. With a renewable penetration rate of 30 %, the minimum strategic reserve cost of a 1000 MW unit is 13,780 CNY/MWh, compared to 15,630 and 26,120 CNY/MWh for 600 MW and 300 MW units, respectively. When the penetration rate increases to 50 %, the minimum cost of 1000 MW, 600 MW, and 300 MW units is reduced by 80.19 %, 77.42 %, and 76.03 %, respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing reserve margin raises costs, while higher renewable penetration advances the optimal conversion age. Large-capacity units consistently offer superior reduction of expected energy not served, with up to 64.65 % reliability improvement. These findings provide empirical guidance for policymakers in coal-dependent countries, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of prioritizing large, moderately aged units for reserve conversion to balance reliability and economic objectives.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"96 ","pages":"Article 101991"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing the strategic reserves of coal-fired power units to balance reliability and cost in China's clean energy transition\",\"authors\":\"Jian Zhang , Yuming Huang , Yuanxin Liu , Na Yang , Jiahai Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The strategic reserve mechanism for coal-fired power units provides a viable policy option to address security concerns in the low-carbon transition of the power system. This paper proposes a strategic reserve selection framework combining Monte Carlo simulation and mixed-integer linear programming to identify optimal reserve units by minimizing the cost per unit reduction in expected energy not served, thereby quantifying the economic efficiency of converting units of different capacities such as 300 MW, 600 MW, and 1000 MW and with service ages ranging from 1 to 30 years into strategic reserves. Simulation results for a representative region in East China indicate that converting 1000 MW units at around 20 years of service age yields the best economic benefits. With a renewable penetration rate of 30 %, the minimum strategic reserve cost of a 1000 MW unit is 13,780 CNY/MWh, compared to 15,630 and 26,120 CNY/MWh for 600 MW and 300 MW units, respectively. When the penetration rate increases to 50 %, the minimum cost of 1000 MW, 600 MW, and 300 MW units is reduced by 80.19 %, 77.42 %, and 76.03 %, respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing reserve margin raises costs, while higher renewable penetration advances the optimal conversion age. Large-capacity units consistently offer superior reduction of expected energy not served, with up to 64.65 % reliability improvement. These findings provide empirical guidance for policymakers in coal-dependent countries, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of prioritizing large, moderately aged units for reserve conversion to balance reliability and economic objectives.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"96 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101991\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725001067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing the strategic reserves of coal-fired power units to balance reliability and cost in China's clean energy transition
The strategic reserve mechanism for coal-fired power units provides a viable policy option to address security concerns in the low-carbon transition of the power system. This paper proposes a strategic reserve selection framework combining Monte Carlo simulation and mixed-integer linear programming to identify optimal reserve units by minimizing the cost per unit reduction in expected energy not served, thereby quantifying the economic efficiency of converting units of different capacities such as 300 MW, 600 MW, and 1000 MW and with service ages ranging from 1 to 30 years into strategic reserves. Simulation results for a representative region in East China indicate that converting 1000 MW units at around 20 years of service age yields the best economic benefits. With a renewable penetration rate of 30 %, the minimum strategic reserve cost of a 1000 MW unit is 13,780 CNY/MWh, compared to 15,630 and 26,120 CNY/MWh for 600 MW and 300 MW units, respectively. When the penetration rate increases to 50 %, the minimum cost of 1000 MW, 600 MW, and 300 MW units is reduced by 80.19 %, 77.42 %, and 76.03 %, respectively. Sensitivity analysis shows that increasing reserve margin raises costs, while higher renewable penetration advances the optimal conversion age. Large-capacity units consistently offer superior reduction of expected energy not served, with up to 64.65 % reliability improvement. These findings provide empirical guidance for policymakers in coal-dependent countries, highlighting the cost-effectiveness of prioritizing large, moderately aged units for reserve conversion to balance reliability and economic objectives.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.