Xavier Marc Thevenot , Tomy Roy , Eva Pakostova , Eric Rosa , Lucie Coudert , Carmen Mihaela Neculita
{"title":"温度和混合成分对富铁污泥和泥炭被动生物滤池去除中性矿井水中砷的影响","authors":"Xavier Marc Thevenot , Tomy Roy , Eva Pakostova , Eric Rosa , Lucie Coudert , Carmen Mihaela Neculita","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In passive biofilters, sorption is the main mechanism of As removal from As-rich neutral mine drainage (As-NMD), but biochemical processes contributing to their performance needs to be better documented. This study aims to evaluate the suitability of two locally available materials (peat and Fe-rich acid mine drainage treatment sludge (AMD-S)) for As-NMD treatment at an operating gold mine located in northern Québec, Canada. First, the efficiency of different mixtures of peat and AMD-S was evaluated. Batch tests were conducted at 22 and 5 °C using synthetic (pH 7.16; 2.0 mg/L As) and real (pH 7.63; 0.91 mg/L As) As-NMD. Results revealed that the P50/AMD-S50 mixture (50 wt% peat +50 wt% AMD<img>S) was the most efficient for As immobilization. Further tests with P50/AMD-S50 showed that As removal was higher for synthetic As-NMD (88 % at 22 °C, 82 % at 5 °C) than for real As-NMD (77 % at 22 °C, 48 % at 5 °C), which was ascribed to residual salinity. P50/AMD-S50 was then used in a lab-scale biofilter system operated in a continuous mode for 3 months (22 °C; hydraulic retention time 1 day). A maximum of As removal efficiency of 98 % was obtained within the first week while As leaching occurred after 27 days. A mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria was observed in the biofilter samples, including Fe-reducers (11 % of total reads), S-oxidizers (6.1 %), SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>-reducers (6.0 %), and As-metabolizing prokaryotes (3.5 %). The remobilization of As from the sorbent remains to be addressed to ensure long-term stability of contaminant treatment systems under real mine site conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 107697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of temperature and mixture composition on arsenic removal from neutral mine drainage in passive biofilters using iron-rich sludge and peat\",\"authors\":\"Xavier Marc Thevenot , Tomy Roy , Eva Pakostova , Eric Rosa , Lucie Coudert , Carmen Mihaela Neculita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In passive biofilters, sorption is the main mechanism of As removal from As-rich neutral mine drainage (As-NMD), but biochemical processes contributing to their performance needs to be better documented. This study aims to evaluate the suitability of two locally available materials (peat and Fe-rich acid mine drainage treatment sludge (AMD-S)) for As-NMD treatment at an operating gold mine located in northern Québec, Canada. First, the efficiency of different mixtures of peat and AMD-S was evaluated. Batch tests were conducted at 22 and 5 °C using synthetic (pH 7.16; 2.0 mg/L As) and real (pH 7.63; 0.91 mg/L As) As-NMD. Results revealed that the P50/AMD-S50 mixture (50 wt% peat +50 wt% AMD<img>S) was the most efficient for As immobilization. Further tests with P50/AMD-S50 showed that As removal was higher for synthetic As-NMD (88 % at 22 °C, 82 % at 5 °C) than for real As-NMD (77 % at 22 °C, 48 % at 5 °C), which was ascribed to residual salinity. P50/AMD-S50 was then used in a lab-scale biofilter system operated in a continuous mode for 3 months (22 °C; hydraulic retention time 1 day). A maximum of As removal efficiency of 98 % was obtained within the first week while As leaching occurred after 27 days. A mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria was observed in the biofilter samples, including Fe-reducers (11 % of total reads), S-oxidizers (6.1 %), SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>-reducers (6.0 %), and As-metabolizing prokaryotes (3.5 %). The remobilization of As from the sorbent remains to be addressed to ensure long-term stability of contaminant treatment systems under real mine site conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001879\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001879","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of temperature and mixture composition on arsenic removal from neutral mine drainage in passive biofilters using iron-rich sludge and peat
In passive biofilters, sorption is the main mechanism of As removal from As-rich neutral mine drainage (As-NMD), but biochemical processes contributing to their performance needs to be better documented. This study aims to evaluate the suitability of two locally available materials (peat and Fe-rich acid mine drainage treatment sludge (AMD-S)) for As-NMD treatment at an operating gold mine located in northern Québec, Canada. First, the efficiency of different mixtures of peat and AMD-S was evaluated. Batch tests were conducted at 22 and 5 °C using synthetic (pH 7.16; 2.0 mg/L As) and real (pH 7.63; 0.91 mg/L As) As-NMD. Results revealed that the P50/AMD-S50 mixture (50 wt% peat +50 wt% AMDS) was the most efficient for As immobilization. Further tests with P50/AMD-S50 showed that As removal was higher for synthetic As-NMD (88 % at 22 °C, 82 % at 5 °C) than for real As-NMD (77 % at 22 °C, 48 % at 5 °C), which was ascribed to residual salinity. P50/AMD-S50 was then used in a lab-scale biofilter system operated in a continuous mode for 3 months (22 °C; hydraulic retention time 1 day). A maximum of As removal efficiency of 98 % was obtained within the first week while As leaching occurred after 27 days. A mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria was observed in the biofilter samples, including Fe-reducers (11 % of total reads), S-oxidizers (6.1 %), SO42--reducers (6.0 %), and As-metabolizing prokaryotes (3.5 %). The remobilization of As from the sorbent remains to be addressed to ensure long-term stability of contaminant treatment systems under real mine site conditions.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.