{"title":"年龄对突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)后听力结局的影响:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Jelena Vukelic , Diana Marzic , Anja Liovic , Dubravko Manestar , Dubravka Matesa Anic","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2025.105932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To analyze the effect of aging on hearing outcomes following treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study reviewed records of 106 SSNHL patients categorized into younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years). Hearing outcomes and related factors including sex, absolute gain, treatment timing, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), audiogram type, and contralateral ear thresholds were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Treatment outcomes between age groups showed no statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.053), though younger age was consistently linked to better recovery. A significant negative correlation between age and absolute hearing gain was observed (<em>r</em> = -0.296, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Younger females showed superior outcomes compared to younger males (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Early treatment predicted better recovery (χ² = 9.04, <em>p</em> < 0.01). A normal contralateral ear threshold was associated with better recovery (<em>p</em> < 0.05). A multivariate logistic regression model was developed (AUC = 0.781). Symptom duration (<em>p</em> < 0.05) and intratympanic therapy (<em>p</em> < 0.05) were significant predictors of hearing outcomes. Age was not a significant independent predictor (<em>p</em> = 0.054), but it improved model fit, supporting its clinical relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The timing of treatment initiation is important for SSNHL prognosis. Although age did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model, its consistent association with better outcomes and contribution to model fit highlight its continued clinical relevance. Early intervention is the key predictor of recovery, reinforcing the value of age-informed, personalized treatment strategies in managing SSNHL.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8306,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"137 ","pages":"Article 105932"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of aging on hearing outcomes after sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL): A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"Jelena Vukelic , Diana Marzic , Anja Liovic , Dubravko Manestar , Dubravka Matesa Anic\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.archger.2025.105932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To analyze the effect of aging on hearing outcomes following treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>This retrospective study reviewed records of 106 SSNHL patients categorized into younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years). Hearing outcomes and related factors including sex, absolute gain, treatment timing, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), audiogram type, and contralateral ear thresholds were examined.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Treatment outcomes between age groups showed no statistically significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.053), though younger age was consistently linked to better recovery. A significant negative correlation between age and absolute hearing gain was observed (<em>r</em> = -0.296, <em>p</em> < 0.05). Younger females showed superior outcomes compared to younger males (<em>p</em> < 0.05). Early treatment predicted better recovery (χ² = 9.04, <em>p</em> < 0.01). A normal contralateral ear threshold was associated with better recovery (<em>p</em> < 0.05). A multivariate logistic regression model was developed (AUC = 0.781). Symptom duration (<em>p</em> < 0.05) and intratympanic therapy (<em>p</em> < 0.05) were significant predictors of hearing outcomes. Age was not a significant independent predictor (<em>p</em> = 0.054), but it improved model fit, supporting its clinical relevance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The timing of treatment initiation is important for SSNHL prognosis. Although age did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model, its consistent association with better outcomes and contribution to model fit highlight its continued clinical relevance. Early intervention is the key predictor of recovery, reinforcing the value of age-informed, personalized treatment strategies in managing SSNHL.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"137 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105932\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016749432500189X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016749432500189X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of aging on hearing outcomes after sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL): A retrospective study
Objectives
To analyze the effect of aging on hearing outcomes following treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL).
Materials and methods
This retrospective study reviewed records of 106 SSNHL patients categorized into younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years). Hearing outcomes and related factors including sex, absolute gain, treatment timing, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT), audiogram type, and contralateral ear thresholds were examined.
Results
Treatment outcomes between age groups showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.053), though younger age was consistently linked to better recovery. A significant negative correlation between age and absolute hearing gain was observed (r = -0.296, p < 0.05). Younger females showed superior outcomes compared to younger males (p < 0.05). Early treatment predicted better recovery (χ² = 9.04, p < 0.01). A normal contralateral ear threshold was associated with better recovery (p < 0.05). A multivariate logistic regression model was developed (AUC = 0.781). Symptom duration (p < 0.05) and intratympanic therapy (p < 0.05) were significant predictors of hearing outcomes. Age was not a significant independent predictor (p = 0.054), but it improved model fit, supporting its clinical relevance.
Conclusions
The timing of treatment initiation is important for SSNHL prognosis. Although age did not reach statistical significance in the multivariate model, its consistent association with better outcomes and contribution to model fit highlight its continued clinical relevance. Early intervention is the key predictor of recovery, reinforcing the value of age-informed, personalized treatment strategies in managing SSNHL.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics provides a medium for the publication of papers from the fields of experimental gerontology and clinical and social geriatrics. The principal aim of the journal is to facilitate the exchange of information between specialists in these three fields of gerontological research. Experimental papers dealing with the basic mechanisms of aging at molecular, cellular, tissue or organ levels will be published.
Clinical papers will be accepted if they provide sufficiently new information or are of fundamental importance for the knowledge of human aging. Purely descriptive clinical papers will be accepted only if the results permit further interpretation. Papers dealing with anti-aging pharmacological preparations in humans are welcome. Papers on the social aspects of geriatrics will be accepted if they are of general interest regarding the epidemiology of aging and the efficiency and working methods of the social organizations for the health care of the elderly.