评估消费者对低排放电力的偏好和支付意愿:来自美国国家选择实验的证据

IF 13.6 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Bruktawit M. Ahmed , Mahelet G. Fikru
{"title":"评估消费者对低排放电力的偏好和支付意愿:来自美国国家选择实验的证据","authors":"Bruktawit M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Mahelet G. Fikru","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines consumer preferences for renewable energy and carbon capture technologies through a choice experiment involving 1200 nationally representative respondents in the US. The analysis estimates willingness to pay (WTP) for increases in renewable energy content, carbon capture, and strategies for managing captured carbon, such as geological storage or industrial utilization. Results reveal a strong preference for low-emission electricity products, with WTP estimates ranging from $2.9 to $4.1 per month for a 10 % increase in renewable content and $0.50 to $2.3 for a 10 % increase in carbon capture. Respondents most preferred carbon capture and utilization for managing emissions, with a WTP ranging from $2 to close to $7 per month. Tax credits positively influenced preferences, while higher electricity bill increases led to aversion. These findings provide insights for policymakers crafting decarbonization strategies that balance clean energy adoption, carbon management, and affordability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"148 ","pages":"Article 108650"},"PeriodicalIF":13.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating consumer preference and willingness to pay for low emission electricity: Evidence from a national choice experiment in the US\",\"authors\":\"Bruktawit M. Ahmed ,&nbsp;Mahelet G. Fikru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines consumer preferences for renewable energy and carbon capture technologies through a choice experiment involving 1200 nationally representative respondents in the US. The analysis estimates willingness to pay (WTP) for increases in renewable energy content, carbon capture, and strategies for managing captured carbon, such as geological storage or industrial utilization. Results reveal a strong preference for low-emission electricity products, with WTP estimates ranging from $2.9 to $4.1 per month for a 10 % increase in renewable content and $0.50 to $2.3 for a 10 % increase in carbon capture. Respondents most preferred carbon capture and utilization for managing emissions, with a WTP ranging from $2 to close to $7 per month. Tax credits positively influenced preferences, while higher electricity bill increases led to aversion. These findings provide insights for policymakers crafting decarbonization strategies that balance clean energy adoption, carbon management, and affordability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"148 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108650\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004773\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325004773","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过一项涉及1200名美国全国代表性受访者的选择实验,考察了消费者对可再生能源和碳捕获技术的偏好。该分析估计了可再生能源含量、碳捕获和管理捕获碳的策略(如地质储存或工业利用)的增加的支付意愿(WTP)。结果显示,人们对低排放的电力产品有强烈的偏好,可再生能源含量增加10%,每月的WTP估计为2.9至4.1美元,碳捕获增加10%,每月的WTP估计为0.50至2.3美元。受访者最喜欢碳捕获和利用来管理排放,WTP每月从2美元到接近7美元不等。税收抵免正向影响偏好,而电费上涨则导致厌恶。这些发现为决策者制定平衡清洁能源采用、碳管理和可负担性的脱碳战略提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating consumer preference and willingness to pay for low emission electricity: Evidence from a national choice experiment in the US
This study examines consumer preferences for renewable energy and carbon capture technologies through a choice experiment involving 1200 nationally representative respondents in the US. The analysis estimates willingness to pay (WTP) for increases in renewable energy content, carbon capture, and strategies for managing captured carbon, such as geological storage or industrial utilization. Results reveal a strong preference for low-emission electricity products, with WTP estimates ranging from $2.9 to $4.1 per month for a 10 % increase in renewable content and $0.50 to $2.3 for a 10 % increase in carbon capture. Respondents most preferred carbon capture and utilization for managing emissions, with a WTP ranging from $2 to close to $7 per month. Tax credits positively influenced preferences, while higher electricity bill increases led to aversion. These findings provide insights for policymakers crafting decarbonization strategies that balance clean energy adoption, carbon management, and affordability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信