流行病、宗教和疫苗抵抗:对意大利宗教社区的多维分析

Q3 Medicine
R. Leone , M.R. Gualano , W. Ricciardi
{"title":"流行病、宗教和疫苗抵抗:对意大利宗教社区的多维分析","authors":"R. Leone ,&nbsp;M.R. Gualano ,&nbsp;W. Ricciardi","doi":"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the intricate relationship between vaccine hesitancy among religious communities and public health efforts, particularly in Italy. Religious groups such as Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Muslims, and Catholics exhibited varying degrees of resistance to vaccination, shaped by theological interpretations, historical mistrust of institutions, and disruptions to communal practices. This study explores these dynamics through legal, sociological, and anthropological lenses to understand the implications for public health and governance during health crises.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The primary aim of this research is to analyze how religious beliefs and practices influenced vaccine hesitancy during the pandemic and to assess the broader impact on public health outcomes. It also seeks to identify strategies for mitigating conflicts between religious freedoms and public health imperatives in future crises.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed qualitative methods, including case studies of religious communities in Italy. The data were extrapolated from semi-structured interviews with religious representatives of the main faiths present in Italy, in particular official and conservative Catholicism, the Orthodox Patriarchate of Western Europe, belonging to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Patriarchate of Moscow, Protestants (Methodist), and the Muslim community, through the following questions:</div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>How was the Covid-19 pandemic received by your religious denomination? What explanation was given?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Were there any divisions within the believing community regarding the reasons attributed to the origin of the pandemic?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>How was the vaccine received? Were there divisions, hostility, or resistance?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>How can faith in God and scientific research be reconciled?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>If there were disagreements, what was the underlying reason for opposition to vaccination?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>What was done to address this division?</div></span></li></ul></div><div>The responses were reviewed to remove any references to individuals or places that could allow identification. Observational data were collected on vaccination campaigns and grassroots initiatives aimed at increasing vaccine uptake within hesitant communities. Analytical methods included thematic coding of interview transcripts and comparative analysis across religious traditions.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities had significant repercussions for public health in Italy. Orthodox groups opposing mRNA vaccines on theological grounds contributed to localized outbreaks, while marginalized Muslim communities exhibited low vaccination rates due to systemic inequities in healthcare access. Protestant denominations generally supported vaccination but faced internal divisions influenced by conspiracy theories. Catholic responses were polarized between progressive factions endorsing vaccination as an act of love and traditionalist groups rejecting mandates as secular overreach. Interfaith initiatives successfully increased vaccine uptake by aligning public health messaging with religious values, demonstrating the importance of collaborative approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities underscores the need for nuanced engagement between public health authorities and faith groups. Future strategies should prioritize inclusive policymaking that respects religious autonomy while addressing theological concerns about biotechnological interventions. Religious institutions must develop doctrinal resources to reconcile faith with scientific advancements, while states must balance individual freedoms with collective welfare during health emergencies. The findings highlight the importance of fostering mutual understanding and shared responsibility to build resilience against emerging health threats in pluralistic societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37707,"journal":{"name":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pandemic, religion, and vaccination resistance: a multidimensional analysis of religious communities in Italy\",\"authors\":\"R. Leone ,&nbsp;M.R. Gualano ,&nbsp;W. Ricciardi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemep.2025.101132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the intricate relationship between vaccine hesitancy among religious communities and public health efforts, particularly in Italy. Religious groups such as Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Muslims, and Catholics exhibited varying degrees of resistance to vaccination, shaped by theological interpretations, historical mistrust of institutions, and disruptions to communal practices. This study explores these dynamics through legal, sociological, and anthropological lenses to understand the implications for public health and governance during health crises.</div></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The primary aim of this research is to analyze how religious beliefs and practices influenced vaccine hesitancy during the pandemic and to assess the broader impact on public health outcomes. It also seeks to identify strategies for mitigating conflicts between religious freedoms and public health imperatives in future crises.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study employed qualitative methods, including case studies of religious communities in Italy. The data were extrapolated from semi-structured interviews with religious representatives of the main faiths present in Italy, in particular official and conservative Catholicism, the Orthodox Patriarchate of Western Europe, belonging to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Patriarchate of Moscow, Protestants (Methodist), and the Muslim community, through the following questions:</div><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>How was the Covid-19 pandemic received by your religious denomination? What explanation was given?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Were there any divisions within the believing community regarding the reasons attributed to the origin of the pandemic?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>How was the vaccine received? Were there divisions, hostility, or resistance?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>How can faith in God and scientific research be reconciled?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>If there were disagreements, what was the underlying reason for opposition to vaccination?</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>What was done to address this division?</div></span></li></ul></div><div>The responses were reviewed to remove any references to individuals or places that could allow identification. Observational data were collected on vaccination campaigns and grassroots initiatives aimed at increasing vaccine uptake within hesitant communities. Analytical methods included thematic coding of interview transcripts and comparative analysis across religious traditions.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities had significant repercussions for public health in Italy. Orthodox groups opposing mRNA vaccines on theological grounds contributed to localized outbreaks, while marginalized Muslim communities exhibited low vaccination rates due to systemic inequities in healthcare access. Protestant denominations generally supported vaccination but faced internal divisions influenced by conspiracy theories. Catholic responses were polarized between progressive factions endorsing vaccination as an act of love and traditionalist groups rejecting mandates as secular overreach. Interfaith initiatives successfully increased vaccine uptake by aligning public health messaging with religious values, demonstrating the importance of collaborative approaches.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities underscores the need for nuanced engagement between public health authorities and faith groups. Future strategies should prioritize inclusive policymaking that respects religious autonomy while addressing theological concerns about biotechnological interventions. Religious institutions must develop doctrinal resources to reconcile faith with scientific advancements, while states must balance individual freedoms with collective welfare during health emergencies. The findings highlight the importance of fostering mutual understanding and shared responsibility to build resilience against emerging health threats in pluralistic societies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255252500091X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics, Medicine and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255252500091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了宗教团体对疫苗的犹豫与公共卫生努力之间的复杂关系,尤其是在意大利。东正教、新教徒、穆斯林和天主教徒等宗教团体对疫苗接种表现出不同程度的抵制,这是由神学解释、历史上对机构的不信任以及对公共实践的破坏造成的。本研究通过法律、社会学和人类学的视角探讨了这些动态,以了解健康危机期间公共卫生和治理的影响。本研究的主要目的是分析大流行期间宗教信仰和习俗如何影响疫苗犹豫,并评估对公共卫生结果的更广泛影响。它还寻求确定在未来危机中减轻宗教自由与公共卫生需要之间冲突的战略。方法本研究采用定性方法,包括对意大利宗教社区的个案研究。通过以下问题,对意大利主要信仰的宗教代表进行了半结构化访谈,推断出这些数据,特别是官方和保守的天主教、隶属于君士坦丁堡宗主教区、莫斯科宗主教区的西欧东正教宗主教区、新教徒(卫理公会教徒)和穆斯林社区的宗教代表:•您的宗教教派如何接受Covid-19大流行?给出了什么解释?•对于大流行起源的原因,信仰团体内部是否存在分歧?•如何接种疫苗?是否存在分歧、敌意或抵抗?•对上帝的信仰和科学研究如何调和?•如果存在分歧,反对接种疫苗的潜在原因是什么?•如何解决这个分歧?对回复进行了审查,以删除任何可能导致身份识别的个人或地点。收集了关于疫苗接种运动和基层倡议的观察数据,旨在增加犹豫不决社区的疫苗接种率。分析方法包括访谈记录的主题编码和跨宗教传统的比较分析。宗教团体对疫苗的犹豫对意大利的公共卫生产生了重大影响。以神学为由反对mRNA疫苗的东正教团体助长了局部暴发,而边缘化的穆斯林社区由于在获得医疗保健方面的系统性不平等,疫苗接种率较低。新教教派普遍支持疫苗接种,但受到阴谋论的影响,面临内部分歧。天主教的反应两极分化,进步派支持疫苗接种是一种爱的行为,而传统派则反对命令,认为这是世俗的越界行为。宗教间倡议通过将公共卫生信息与宗教价值观结合起来,成功地提高了疫苗的接种率,表明了合作办法的重要性。宗教团体对疫苗的犹豫强调了公共卫生当局和宗教团体之间微妙接触的必要性。未来的战略应该优先考虑尊重宗教自治的包容性政策制定,同时解决对生物技术干预的神学担忧。宗教机构必须发展教义资源,调和信仰与科学进步,而国家必须在卫生紧急情况下平衡个人自由与集体福利。调查结果强调了促进相互理解和分担责任的重要性,以便在多元化社会中建立抵御新出现的卫生威胁的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pandemic, religion, and vaccination resistance: a multidimensional analysis of religious communities in Italy

Background

The Covid-19 pandemic highlighted the intricate relationship between vaccine hesitancy among religious communities and public health efforts, particularly in Italy. Religious groups such as Orthodox Christians, Protestants, Muslims, and Catholics exhibited varying degrees of resistance to vaccination, shaped by theological interpretations, historical mistrust of institutions, and disruptions to communal practices. This study explores these dynamics through legal, sociological, and anthropological lenses to understand the implications for public health and governance during health crises.

Purpose

The primary aim of this research is to analyze how religious beliefs and practices influenced vaccine hesitancy during the pandemic and to assess the broader impact on public health outcomes. It also seeks to identify strategies for mitigating conflicts between religious freedoms and public health imperatives in future crises.

Methods

This study employed qualitative methods, including case studies of religious communities in Italy. The data were extrapolated from semi-structured interviews with religious representatives of the main faiths present in Italy, in particular official and conservative Catholicism, the Orthodox Patriarchate of Western Europe, belonging to the Patriarchate of Constantinople, the Patriarchate of Moscow, Protestants (Methodist), and the Muslim community, through the following questions:
  • How was the Covid-19 pandemic received by your religious denomination? What explanation was given?
  • Were there any divisions within the believing community regarding the reasons attributed to the origin of the pandemic?
  • How was the vaccine received? Were there divisions, hostility, or resistance?
  • How can faith in God and scientific research be reconciled?
  • If there were disagreements, what was the underlying reason for opposition to vaccination?
  • What was done to address this division?
The responses were reviewed to remove any references to individuals or places that could allow identification. Observational data were collected on vaccination campaigns and grassroots initiatives aimed at increasing vaccine uptake within hesitant communities. Analytical methods included thematic coding of interview transcripts and comparative analysis across religious traditions.

Findings

Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities had significant repercussions for public health in Italy. Orthodox groups opposing mRNA vaccines on theological grounds contributed to localized outbreaks, while marginalized Muslim communities exhibited low vaccination rates due to systemic inequities in healthcare access. Protestant denominations generally supported vaccination but faced internal divisions influenced by conspiracy theories. Catholic responses were polarized between progressive factions endorsing vaccination as an act of love and traditionalist groups rejecting mandates as secular overreach. Interfaith initiatives successfully increased vaccine uptake by aligning public health messaging with religious values, demonstrating the importance of collaborative approaches.

Conclusions

Vaccine hesitancy among religious communities underscores the need for nuanced engagement between public health authorities and faith groups. Future strategies should prioritize inclusive policymaking that respects religious autonomy while addressing theological concerns about biotechnological interventions. Religious institutions must develop doctrinal resources to reconcile faith with scientific advancements, while states must balance individual freedoms with collective welfare during health emergencies. The findings highlight the importance of fostering mutual understanding and shared responsibility to build resilience against emerging health threats in pluralistic societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
Ethics, Medicine and Public Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: This review aims to compare approaches to medical ethics and bioethics in two forms, Anglo-Saxon (Ethics, Medicine and Public Health) and French (Ethique, Médecine et Politiques Publiques). Thus, in their native languages, the authors will present research on the legitimacy of the practice and appreciation of the consequences of acts towards patients as compared to the limits acceptable by the community, as illustrated by the democratic debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信