Ariana Lott, Jairo Triana, Carlos G. Sandoval, Vishal Sundaram, Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas, Michael J. Alaia, Laith M. Jazrawi, Eric J. Strauss, Kirk A. Campbell
{"title":"供体-受体性别不匹配不影响同种异体膝关节骨软骨移植后移植物的存活","authors":"Ariana Lott, Jairo Triana, Carlos G. Sandoval, Vishal Sundaram, Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas, Michael J. Alaia, Laith M. Jazrawi, Eric J. Strauss, Kirk A. Campbell","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2025.05.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the effect of donor-recipient sex-mismatch on graft survival, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and return to sport (RTS) following knee osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent knee OCA transplantation between 2011 and 2022 with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were divided into two cohorts (same-sex (SS) and different-sex (DS) donor). Cumulative survival was compared via multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for age, graft size, and body mass index (BMI). A sub-analysis comparing PROs between groups was performed, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and RTS rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>285 patients were included (189 SS, 96 DS) with mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.0 years. There was a graft failure rate of 6.0% with no significant difference in graft survival rate between DS and SS groups (<em>p</em> = 0.70). Sub-analyses between the four donor-recipient groups (male-male, female-male, male–female, and female-female) and between female and male donor groups demonstrated no significant differences in graft survival. Among patients who failed the procedure, time to failure was significantly shorter for those with sex-mismatched grafts (353 days vs. 864 days, <em>p</em> = 0.002). Sub-analysis of a 71-patient cohort with two-year PROs demonstrated no differences between SS and DS groups with respect to satisfaction, pain, or KOOS scores after controlling for sex (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients undergoing knee OCA transplantation demonstrated no observable differences in graft survivorship based on donor-recipient graft sex-matching, suggesting that surgeons can use sex-mismatched grafts and expect limited effect on graft survivorship.</div><div><strong>Level of Evidence:</strong> IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"56 ","pages":"Pages 285-292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Donor-recipient sex mismatch does not affect graft survivorship after knee osteochondral allograft transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Ariana Lott, Jairo Triana, Carlos G. Sandoval, Vishal Sundaram, Guillem Gonzalez-Lomas, Michael J. Alaia, Laith M. Jazrawi, Eric J. Strauss, Kirk A. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2025.05.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study aims to investigate the effect of donor-recipient sex-mismatch on graft survival, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and return to sport (RTS) following knee osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent knee OCA transplantation between 2011 and 2022 with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were divided into two cohorts (same-sex (SS) and different-sex (DS) donor). Cumulative survival was compared via multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for age, graft size, and body mass index (BMI). A sub-analysis comparing PROs between groups was performed, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and RTS rates.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>285 patients were included (189 SS, 96 DS) with mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.0 years. There was a graft failure rate of 6.0% with no significant difference in graft survival rate between DS and SS groups (<em>p</em> = 0.70). Sub-analyses between the four donor-recipient groups (male-male, female-male, male–female, and female-female) and between female and male donor groups demonstrated no significant differences in graft survival. Among patients who failed the procedure, time to failure was significantly shorter for those with sex-mismatched grafts (353 days vs. 864 days, <em>p</em> = 0.002). Sub-analysis of a 71-patient cohort with two-year PROs demonstrated no differences between SS and DS groups with respect to satisfaction, pain, or KOOS scores after controlling for sex (<em>p</em> > 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients undergoing knee OCA transplantation demonstrated no observable differences in graft survivorship based on donor-recipient graft sex-matching, suggesting that surgeons can use sex-mismatched grafts and expect limited effect on graft survivorship.</div><div><strong>Level of Evidence:</strong> IV.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"56 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 285-292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025001371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016025001371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Donor-recipient sex mismatch does not affect graft survivorship after knee osteochondral allograft transplantation
Background
This study aims to investigate the effect of donor-recipient sex-mismatch on graft survival, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and return to sport (RTS) following knee osteochondral allograft (OCA) transplantation.
Methods
Patients who underwent knee OCA transplantation between 2011 and 2022 with minimum 2-year clinical follow-up were divided into two cohorts (same-sex (SS) and different-sex (DS) donor). Cumulative survival was compared via multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for age, graft size, and body mass index (BMI). A sub-analysis comparing PROs between groups was performed, including the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and RTS rates.
Results
285 patients were included (189 SS, 96 DS) with mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 2.0 years. There was a graft failure rate of 6.0% with no significant difference in graft survival rate between DS and SS groups (p = 0.70). Sub-analyses between the four donor-recipient groups (male-male, female-male, male–female, and female-female) and between female and male donor groups demonstrated no significant differences in graft survival. Among patients who failed the procedure, time to failure was significantly shorter for those with sex-mismatched grafts (353 days vs. 864 days, p = 0.002). Sub-analysis of a 71-patient cohort with two-year PROs demonstrated no differences between SS and DS groups with respect to satisfaction, pain, or KOOS scores after controlling for sex (p > 0.05).
Conclusion
Patients undergoing knee OCA transplantation demonstrated no observable differences in graft survivorship based on donor-recipient graft sex-matching, suggesting that surgeons can use sex-mismatched grafts and expect limited effect on graft survivorship.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.