与基于床的中间护理相比,综合老年住院在家增加了老年人在家的天数:倾向评分匹配分析

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Tessa Mazzarone, Laura M Pérez, Lorena Villa, Oriol Planesas-Pérez, Filippo M Verri, Ana de Andrés, Ana Gonzalez-de Luna, Maria F Velarde, Roger Martí-Tarradell, Marco Inzitari, Aida Ribera
{"title":"与基于床的中间护理相比,综合老年住院在家增加了老年人在家的天数:倾向评分匹配分析","authors":"Tessa Mazzarone, Laura M Pérez, Lorena Villa, Oriol Planesas-Pérez, Filippo M Verri, Ana de Andrés, Ana Gonzalez-de Luna, Maria F Velarde, Roger Martí-Tarradell, Marco Inzitari, Aida Ribera","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afaf162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To compare the effectiveness and safety of Hospital-at-Home based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA-HaH) for older adults with bed-based Intermediate Care Unit (BBU). Design Cohort study comparing all consecutive CGA-HaH cases managed between January 2018 and December 2023 with contemporary BBU-matched controls at the largest geriatric care provider in Barcelona. Methods We linked all intermediate care admissions at Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili to the Catalan health information system data to track patients’ trajectories from 6 months before the index episode to June 2024. Patients admitted to CGA-HaH were matched to BBU controls using propensity score matching (PSM) based on their baseline characteristics. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the association of CGA-HaH with the percentage of days spent at home (%DSH) and Cox regression to assess the risk of death and first re-hospitalisation. Results We included 1180 consecutive CGA-HaH and 10,528 BBU episodes. CGA-HaH patients were significantly older and more functionally impaired and had better socioeconomic status. After PSM, we compared 961 CGA-HaH and 961 BBU patients, with a mean follow-up of 705 days (SD 593). CGA-HaH patients had a 7.4 higher %DSH (95% CI: 4.5–10.2, P < 0.001) with similar first re-hospitalisation [HR 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91–1.1)] and mortality risk [HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81–1.06)]. Conclusions Our results suggest that CGA-Hospital-at-Home is a viable alternative to traditional inpatient intermediate care for older adults, offering relevant advantages such as increased time spent at home without a rise in mortality.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive geriatric hospital-at-home increases the days at home in older adults compared to bed-based intermediate care: a propensity score matching analysis\",\"authors\":\"Tessa Mazzarone, Laura M Pérez, Lorena Villa, Oriol Planesas-Pérez, Filippo M Verri, Ana de Andrés, Ana Gonzalez-de Luna, Maria F Velarde, Roger Martí-Tarradell, Marco Inzitari, Aida Ribera\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ageing/afaf162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives To compare the effectiveness and safety of Hospital-at-Home based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA-HaH) for older adults with bed-based Intermediate Care Unit (BBU). Design Cohort study comparing all consecutive CGA-HaH cases managed between January 2018 and December 2023 with contemporary BBU-matched controls at the largest geriatric care provider in Barcelona. Methods We linked all intermediate care admissions at Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili to the Catalan health information system data to track patients’ trajectories from 6 months before the index episode to June 2024. Patients admitted to CGA-HaH were matched to BBU controls using propensity score matching (PSM) based on their baseline characteristics. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the association of CGA-HaH with the percentage of days spent at home (%DSH) and Cox regression to assess the risk of death and first re-hospitalisation. Results We included 1180 consecutive CGA-HaH and 10,528 BBU episodes. CGA-HaH patients were significantly older and more functionally impaired and had better socioeconomic status. After PSM, we compared 961 CGA-HaH and 961 BBU patients, with a mean follow-up of 705 days (SD 593). CGA-HaH patients had a 7.4 higher %DSH (95% CI: 4.5–10.2, P < 0.001) with similar first re-hospitalisation [HR 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91–1.1)] and mortality risk [HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81–1.06)]. Conclusions Our results suggest that CGA-Hospital-at-Home is a viable alternative to traditional inpatient intermediate care for older adults, offering relevant advantages such as increased time spent at home without a rise in mortality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Age and ageing\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Age and ageing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较基于综合老年病评估(CGA-HaH)的住院式中间护理单元(BBU)治疗老年人的有效性和安全性。设计队列研究将2018年1月至2023年12月期间管理的所有连续CGA-HaH病例与巴塞罗那最大的老年护理提供者的当代bbu匹配对照进行比较。方法:我们将Pere Virgili卫生公园的所有中间护理住院患者与加泰罗尼亚卫生信息系统数据联系起来,追踪患者从指数发作前6个月到2024年6月的轨迹。采用基于基线特征的倾向评分匹配(PSM),将接受CGA-HaH治疗的患者与BBU对照组进行匹配。我们使用多变量线性回归来评估CGA-HaH与在家天数百分比(%DSH)的关系,并使用Cox回归来评估死亡和首次再住院的风险。结果我们纳入了1180例连续CGA-HaH和10528例BBU发作。CGA-HaH患者明显年龄较大,功能受损较多,社会经济地位较好。PSM后,我们比较了961例CGA-HaH和961例BBU患者,平均随访705天(SD 593)。CGA-HaH患者的DSH高出7.4 % (95% CI: 4.5-10.2, P <;0.001),首次再住院率[HR 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91-1.1)]和死亡风险[HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.06)]相似。结论:我们的研究结果表明,cga -在家医院是传统的老年人住院中间护理的可行替代方案,具有相关优势,如增加在家的时间而不增加死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive geriatric hospital-at-home increases the days at home in older adults compared to bed-based intermediate care: a propensity score matching analysis
Objectives To compare the effectiveness and safety of Hospital-at-Home based on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA-HaH) for older adults with bed-based Intermediate Care Unit (BBU). Design Cohort study comparing all consecutive CGA-HaH cases managed between January 2018 and December 2023 with contemporary BBU-matched controls at the largest geriatric care provider in Barcelona. Methods We linked all intermediate care admissions at Parc Sanitari Pere Virgili to the Catalan health information system data to track patients’ trajectories from 6 months before the index episode to June 2024. Patients admitted to CGA-HaH were matched to BBU controls using propensity score matching (PSM) based on their baseline characteristics. We used multivariable linear regression to assess the association of CGA-HaH with the percentage of days spent at home (%DSH) and Cox regression to assess the risk of death and first re-hospitalisation. Results We included 1180 consecutive CGA-HaH and 10,528 BBU episodes. CGA-HaH patients were significantly older and more functionally impaired and had better socioeconomic status. After PSM, we compared 961 CGA-HaH and 961 BBU patients, with a mean follow-up of 705 days (SD 593). CGA-HaH patients had a 7.4 higher %DSH (95% CI: 4.5–10.2, P &lt; 0.001) with similar first re-hospitalisation [HR 1.02 (95% CI: 0.91–1.1)] and mortality risk [HR: 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81–1.06)]. Conclusions Our results suggest that CGA-Hospital-at-Home is a viable alternative to traditional inpatient intermediate care for older adults, offering relevant advantages such as increased time spent at home without a rise in mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信