Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin
{"title":"通过捕食者胃内容物评估底栖生物:丰度和栖息地利用的时空模拟","authors":"Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of <i>Chionoecetes</i> crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing benthos through predator stomach contents: spatiotemporal modeling of abundance and habitat use\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of <i>Chionoecetes</i> crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07723\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing benthos through predator stomach contents: spatiotemporal modeling of abundance and habitat use
In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of Chionoecetes crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.