通过捕食者胃内容物评估底栖生物:丰度和栖息地利用的时空模拟

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1002/ecog.07723
Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin
{"title":"通过捕食者胃内容物评估底栖生物:丰度和栖息地利用的时空模拟","authors":"Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin","doi":"10.1002/ecog.07723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of <i>Chionoecetes</i> crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing benthos through predator stomach contents: spatiotemporal modeling of abundance and habitat use\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan C. P. Reum, James T. Thorson, Cynthia Yeung, Kerim Aydin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ecog.07723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of <i>Chionoecetes</i> crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecography\",\"volume\":\"90 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07723\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.07723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在陆架生态系统中,底栖无脊椎动物促进营养物质的循环和能量向更高营养水平的转移。然而,通过直接抽样进行大规模监测(例如使用底栖生物捕获物或底拖网)在时间和劳动力方面可能代价高昂。在这里,我们展示了一种基于捕食者胃内容物的饲料群(即被捕食者捕食的物种或功能群)的标准化丰度指数的方法。建模方法类似于从渔业单位努力渔获量数据估计丰度指数的方法;说明捕食者的种类和大小在饲料群体选择上的差异,这可能会随着空间的变化而变化;当饮食在空间、时间和捕食者物种之间采样不均匀时,可以进行指数估计。我们将该模型应用于白令海东部四十年的底栖鱼类饮食数据,并估计了九种底栖饲料群的丰度指数。利用拟合模型生成:1)牧草类群相对生物量密度的时间平均图和潜在核心生境区划分;2)区域生物量指数时间序列;3)基于底栖牧草群落组成和区域面积变化的生物区域评价。饲料生物量密度与直接取样(底拖网)生物量密度的平均相关性为0.61 ~ 0.69。直接调查样本较少的多毛类和双壳类(底栖生物捕获物)的相关性也为正,但较弱(分别为0.45和0.20),可能反映了捕食者和采样装置或采样误差之间的选择差异较大。我们认为,饮食数据可以提供一个额外的和具有成本效益的透镜,通过它可以量化饲料物种的丰度,并有助于监测海洋生态系统的变化。丰度指数可用于后续的整个生态系统模型,生境利用图可用于为空间管理决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing benthos through predator stomach contents: spatiotemporal modeling of abundance and habitat use
In shelf ecosystems, benthic invertebrates facilitate nutrient recycling and the transfer of energy to higher trophic levels. However, large-scale monitoring through direct sampling (e.g. using benthic grabs or bottom trawls) can be costly in terms of time and labor. Here, we demonstrate a method for developing standardized abundance indices of forage groups (i.e. species or functional groups preyed upon by predators) based on predator stomach contents. The modeling approach is analogous to methods for estimating abundance indices from fisheries catch-per-unit-effort data; accounts for predator species- and size-specific differences in forage group selectivities, which may vary over space; and permits index estimation when diets are unevenly sampled over space, time, and across predator species. We apply the model to four decades of groundfish diet data from the eastern Bering Sea and estimate abundance indices for nine benthic forage groups. The fitted models were then used to generate: 1) time-averaged maps of relative biomass density for forage groups and demarcation of potential core habitat areas; 2) region-wide biomass index time series; and 3) an assessment of bioregions based on benthic forage community composition and change in bioregion area over time. Diet-based biomass densities were on average correlated well with densities obtained from direct sampling (bottom trawl) for species of Chionoecetes crabs (0.61–0.69). Correlations for polychaetes and bivalves, which had fewer direct survey samples (benthic grabs) were also positive but weaker (0.45 and 0.20, respectively), potentially reflecting larger differences in selectivities between predators and sampling gear or sampling error. We argue that diet data can provide an additional and cost-efficient lens through which abundances of forage species can be quantified and aid efforts to monitor change in marine ecosystems. Abundance indices can be used in subsequent whole-of-ecosystem models, and habitat utilization maps can be used to inform spatial management decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信