Chen Bai, Feifei Xiao, Mohammad Al-Ani, Catherine C Price, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini
{"title":"使用真实世界数据对基于人工智能的术前虚弱指数进行外部验证。","authors":"Chen Bai, Feifei Xiao, Mohammad Al-Ani, Catherine C Price, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative frailty assessment is crucial for surgical risk stratification in older adults. Traditional frailty measurements are often too time-consuming and resource-intensive in preoperative settings. This study aimed to externally validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based frailty index developed using electronic health records (EHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We externally validated an AI-based frailty index, previously developed by our team, on a cohort of 152,364 surgical patients aged 65+ years from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We examined the association between the predicted frailty and three postoperative outcomes: 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. We also compared the predictive performance of general and service-specific frailty indices (the latter developed using data from patients undergoing specific surgeries) in predicting postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based frailty index demonstrated a strong and stepwise association with adverse postoperative outcomes. Patients in the highest frailty level (top 20%) had significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR 4.33, 95% CI 3.91-4.80), longer hospital stays (2.53 times longer, 95% CI 2.47-2.60), and a higher likelihood of unfavorable discharge dispositions compared to the lowest frailty level, after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. The general frailty index performed comparably to or slightly better than service-specific indices across surgical specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed preoperative frailty index effectively predicts postoperative outcomes in a large and diverse external cohort. The index's efficiency and predictive performance in stratifying surgical risk can potentially improve surgical care and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94243,"journal":{"name":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of an AI-based Preoperative Frailty Index using Real-World Data.\",\"authors\":\"Chen Bai, Feifei Xiao, Mohammad Al-Ani, Catherine C Price, Todd M Manini, Mamoun T Mardini\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gerona/glaf119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preoperative frailty assessment is crucial for surgical risk stratification in older adults. Traditional frailty measurements are often too time-consuming and resource-intensive in preoperative settings. This study aimed to externally validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based frailty index developed using electronic health records (EHR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We externally validated an AI-based frailty index, previously developed by our team, on a cohort of 152,364 surgical patients aged 65+ years from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We examined the association between the predicted frailty and three postoperative outcomes: 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. We also compared the predictive performance of general and service-specific frailty indices (the latter developed using data from patients undergoing specific surgeries) in predicting postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based frailty index demonstrated a strong and stepwise association with adverse postoperative outcomes. Patients in the highest frailty level (top 20%) had significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR 4.33, 95% CI 3.91-4.80), longer hospital stays (2.53 times longer, 95% CI 2.47-2.60), and a higher likelihood of unfavorable discharge dispositions compared to the lowest frailty level, after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. The general frailty index performed comparably to or slightly better than service-specific indices across surgical specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed preoperative frailty index effectively predicts postoperative outcomes in a large and diverse external cohort. The index's efficiency and predictive performance in stratifying surgical risk can potentially improve surgical care and outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:术前虚弱评估是老年人手术风险分层的关键。传统的脆弱性测量在术前通常过于耗时和资源密集。本研究旨在从外部验证使用电子健康记录(EHR)开发的基于人工智能(AI)的虚弱指数。方法:我们从外部验证了我们团队先前开发的基于人工智能的虚弱指数,该指数来自OneFlorida+临床研究联盟的152,364名65岁以上的外科患者。我们研究了预测的虚弱与三个术后结局之间的关系:30天死亡率、住院时间和出院处置。我们还比较了一般虚弱指数和特定服务虚弱指数(后者使用接受特定手术的患者的数据开发)在预测术后结果方面的预测性能。结果:基于人工智能的衰弱指数与术后不良结果呈强且逐步相关。在调整了人口统计学和合共病后,最高虚弱水平的患者(前20%)的30天死亡率(OR 4.33, 95% CI 3.91-4.80)、更长的住院时间(2.53倍,95% CI 2.47-2.60)和更大的不良出院倾向的可能性高于最低虚弱水平的患者。一般虚弱指数的表现与外科专科的服务特定指数相当或略好。结论:制定的术前虚弱指数能有效预测大量不同外部队列的术后预后。该指数在分层手术风险方面的效率和预测性能可以潜在地改善手术护理和结果。
External Validation of an AI-based Preoperative Frailty Index using Real-World Data.
Background: Preoperative frailty assessment is crucial for surgical risk stratification in older adults. Traditional frailty measurements are often too time-consuming and resource-intensive in preoperative settings. This study aimed to externally validate an artificial intelligence (AI)-based frailty index developed using electronic health records (EHR).
Methods: We externally validated an AI-based frailty index, previously developed by our team, on a cohort of 152,364 surgical patients aged 65+ years from the OneFlorida+ Clinical Research Consortium. We examined the association between the predicted frailty and three postoperative outcomes: 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay, and discharge disposition. We also compared the predictive performance of general and service-specific frailty indices (the latter developed using data from patients undergoing specific surgeries) in predicting postoperative outcomes.
Results: The AI-based frailty index demonstrated a strong and stepwise association with adverse postoperative outcomes. Patients in the highest frailty level (top 20%) had significantly higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR 4.33, 95% CI 3.91-4.80), longer hospital stays (2.53 times longer, 95% CI 2.47-2.60), and a higher likelihood of unfavorable discharge dispositions compared to the lowest frailty level, after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities. The general frailty index performed comparably to or slightly better than service-specific indices across surgical specialties.
Conclusion: The developed preoperative frailty index effectively predicts postoperative outcomes in a large and diverse external cohort. The index's efficiency and predictive performance in stratifying surgical risk can potentially improve surgical care and outcomes.