多种再矿化剂对漂白后色光稳定性的影响:一项随机双盲临床研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
B Ismail, Z Soliman, B Ismail, F El-Askary
{"title":"多种再矿化剂对漂白后色光稳定性的影响:一项随机双盲临床研究。","authors":"B Ismail, Z Soliman, B Ismail, F El-Askary","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of four remineralizing agents on post-bleaching shade stability and to evaluate the agreement between objective and subjective shade assessments.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Forty-eight eligible patients underwent in-office bleaching with 32% hydrogen peroxide, followed by one of the following: 1. potassium nitrate/sodium fluoride (After Whitening Mousse, AWM, n=11), 2. casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate/fluoride (MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 3. nano-hydroxyapatite/fluoride (Remin Pro, RP, n=11), or 4. PolyAmidoamine Dendrimer (PAMAM, n=13). Stability was assessed using ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, and ΔWID at regular follow-ups over one year. Statistical analyses were performed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Kendall's W, and Cohen's Kappa (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on linear mixedeffects model, remineralizing agents did not significantly affect ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, or ΔWID (p⟩0.05). The follow-up time had a significant effect on these color parameters (p⟨0.05). No post-bleaching shade relapse was observed in any of the experimental groups. There were slight to moderate agreements between the two evaluation methods (Kappa=0.106, W=0.504).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the remineralizing agents compromised post-bleaching shade stability. Accurate post-bleaching shade stability assessment requires both objective and subjective methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bleaching stability was maintained with all remineralizing agents evaluated in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study.\",\"authors\":\"B Ismail, Z Soliman, B Ismail, F El-Askary\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to compare the effects of four remineralizing agents on post-bleaching shade stability and to evaluate the agreement between objective and subjective shade assessments.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Forty-eight eligible patients underwent in-office bleaching with 32% hydrogen peroxide, followed by one of the following: 1. potassium nitrate/sodium fluoride (After Whitening Mousse, AWM, n=11), 2. casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate/fluoride (MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 3. nano-hydroxyapatite/fluoride (Remin Pro, RP, n=11), or 4. PolyAmidoamine Dendrimer (PAMAM, n=13). Stability was assessed using ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, and ΔWID at regular follow-ups over one year. Statistical analyses were performed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Kendall's W, and Cohen's Kappa (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on linear mixedeffects model, remineralizing agents did not significantly affect ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, or ΔWID (p⟩0.05). The follow-up time had a significant effect on these color parameters (p⟨0.05). No post-bleaching shade relapse was observed in any of the experimental groups. There were slight to moderate agreements between the two evaluation methods (Kappa=0.106, W=0.504).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>None of the remineralizing agents compromised post-bleaching shade stability. Accurate post-bleaching shade stability assessment requires both objective and subjective methods.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Bleaching stability was maintained with all remineralizing agents evaluated in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2896Ismail10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较四种再矿化剂对漂白后遮光稳定性的影响,并评估客观和主观遮光评估之间的一致性。方法:48例符合条件的患者在办公室用32%的双氧水进行漂白,然后进行以下其中一项:硝酸钾/氟化钠(美白摩丝后,AWM, n=11), 2。酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形磷酸钙/氟化物(MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 2。纳米羟基磷灰石/氟化物(Remin Pro, RP, n=11)或4。聚酰胺胺树状大分子(PAMAM, n=13)。在一年多的定期随访中,使用ΔE、ΔSGU、ΔL*、Δb*和ΔWID评估稳定性。统计学分析采用线性混合效应模型Kendall’s W和Cohen’s Kappa (α = 0.05)。结果:基于线性混合效应模型,再矿化剂对ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*或ΔWID没有显著影响(p⟩0.05)。随访时间对这些颜色参数有显著影响(p⟨0.05)。所有实验组均未见漂白后色斑复发。两种评价方法有轻微到中度的一致性(Kappa=0.106, W=0.504)。结论:没有再矿化剂损害漂白后荫蔽稳定性。准确的漂白后遮光稳定性评估需要客观和主观的方法。临床相关性:本研究评估的所有再矿化剂均能维持漂白稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Various Remineralizing Agents on Post-bleaching Shade Stability: A Randomized Double-blind Clinical Study.

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of four remineralizing agents on post-bleaching shade stability and to evaluate the agreement between objective and subjective shade assessments.

Methodology: Forty-eight eligible patients underwent in-office bleaching with 32% hydrogen peroxide, followed by one of the following: 1. potassium nitrate/sodium fluoride (After Whitening Mousse, AWM, n=11), 2. casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate/fluoride (MI Paste Plus, MI, n=13), 3. nano-hydroxyapatite/fluoride (Remin Pro, RP, n=11), or 4. PolyAmidoamine Dendrimer (PAMAM, n=13). Stability was assessed using ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, and ΔWID at regular follow-ups over one year. Statistical analyses were performed using a Linear Mixed-Effects Model, Kendall's W, and Cohen's Kappa (α = 0.05).

Results: Based on linear mixedeffects model, remineralizing agents did not significantly affect ΔE, ΔSGU, ΔL*, Δb*, or ΔWID (p⟩0.05). The follow-up time had a significant effect on these color parameters (p⟨0.05). No post-bleaching shade relapse was observed in any of the experimental groups. There were slight to moderate agreements between the two evaluation methods (Kappa=0.106, W=0.504).

Conclusions: None of the remineralizing agents compromised post-bleaching shade stability. Accurate post-bleaching shade stability assessment requires both objective and subjective methods.

Clinical relevance: Bleaching stability was maintained with all remineralizing agents evaluated in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信