为简单而设计,为复杂而使用:塑造免预约诊所实践和结果的系统压力。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325793
Braeden A Terpou, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Ruoxi Wang, Danielle Martin, Mina Tadrous, Sacha Bhatia, Jennifer Shuldiner, Simon Berthelot, Niels Thakkar, Kerry McBrien, Bahram Rahman, Aisha Lofters, J Michael Paterson, Rita McCracken, Christine Salahub, Tara Kiran, Noah M Ivers, Laura Desveaux
{"title":"为简单而设计,为复杂而使用:塑造免预约诊所实践和结果的系统压力。","authors":"Braeden A Terpou, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Ruoxi Wang, Danielle Martin, Mina Tadrous, Sacha Bhatia, Jennifer Shuldiner, Simon Berthelot, Niels Thakkar, Kerry McBrien, Bahram Rahman, Aisha Lofters, J Michael Paterson, Rita McCracken, Christine Salahub, Tara Kiran, Noah M Ivers, Laura Desveaux","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walk-in clinics (WICs), appreciated for their accessibility and convenience, have become an increasingly popular healthcare option in Ontario for patients with and without primary care enrolment. Despite their utility, WICs face criticism for delivering lower-quality care compared to comprehensive, enrolment-based primary care models. Critics argue that WICs contribute to system inefficiencies and encourage practice patterns misaligned with population health goals. This study explored physician perspectives on two key outcomes often associated with low-quality care in WICs: repeat primary care visits and potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Ontario-based family physicians (N = 19) who had experience practicing in both WICs and enrolment-based primary care. The findings highlight systemic challenges, including limited access to enrolment-based primary care and increasing healthcare demands, which have pushed WICs beyond their intended role. This misalignment has created tensions between their structure and purpose, resulting in visits that participants described as more transactional than those in primary care. These constraints-rooted in a lack of informational and relational continuity-often limited participants' ability to provide in-depth engagement or follow-up care. Repeat visits were frequently linked to efforts to ensure continuity for complex or chronic conditions. Similarly, participants acknowledged the reality of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, attributing it to the high patient volume, desire to satisfy patient expectations, and a tendency to \"err on the side of caution\" when the nature of the illness is in question. The findings underscore how health system pressures and well-intended policies, such as Ontario's primary care access bonus, can produce unintended consequences, including inequities in access and difficulties with care coordination across settings. Addressing these challenges requires reforms to better integrate WICs with the primary care system, alongside tailored training to support physician decision-making in episodic care contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325793"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148145/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Braeden A Terpou, Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, Ruoxi Wang, Danielle Martin, Mina Tadrous, Sacha Bhatia, Jennifer Shuldiner, Simon Berthelot, Niels Thakkar, Kerry McBrien, Bahram Rahman, Aisha Lofters, J Michael Paterson, Rita McCracken, Christine Salahub, Tara Kiran, Noah M Ivers, Laura Desveaux\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Walk-in clinics (WICs), appreciated for their accessibility and convenience, have become an increasingly popular healthcare option in Ontario for patients with and without primary care enrolment. Despite their utility, WICs face criticism for delivering lower-quality care compared to comprehensive, enrolment-based primary care models. Critics argue that WICs contribute to system inefficiencies and encourage practice patterns misaligned with population health goals. This study explored physician perspectives on two key outcomes often associated with low-quality care in WICs: repeat primary care visits and potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Ontario-based family physicians (N = 19) who had experience practicing in both WICs and enrolment-based primary care. The findings highlight systemic challenges, including limited access to enrolment-based primary care and increasing healthcare demands, which have pushed WICs beyond their intended role. This misalignment has created tensions between their structure and purpose, resulting in visits that participants described as more transactional than those in primary care. These constraints-rooted in a lack of informational and relational continuity-often limited participants' ability to provide in-depth engagement or follow-up care. Repeat visits were frequently linked to efforts to ensure continuity for complex or chronic conditions. Similarly, participants acknowledged the reality of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, attributing it to the high patient volume, desire to satisfy patient expectations, and a tendency to \\\"err on the side of caution\\\" when the nature of the illness is in question. The findings underscore how health system pressures and well-intended policies, such as Ontario's primary care access bonus, can produce unintended consequences, including inequities in access and difficulties with care coordination across settings. Addressing these challenges requires reforms to better integrate WICs with the primary care system, alongside tailored training to support physician decision-making in episodic care contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0325793\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148145/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325793\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325793","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

步入式诊所(WICs)因其可及性和便利性而受到赞赏,已成为安大略省越来越受欢迎的医疗保健选择,适用于有或没有初级保健登记的患者。尽管具有实用性,但与综合的、基于注册的初级保健模式相比,WICs因提供较低质量的护理而面临批评。批评者认为,世界卫生组织导致系统效率低下,并鼓励与人口健康目标不一致的实践模式。本研究探讨了医生对WICs中通常与低质量护理相关的两个关键结果的看法:重复初级保健就诊和可能不适当的抗生素处方。采用定性描述方法,对安大略省的家庭医生(N = 19)进行了半结构化访谈,这些医生在WICs和基于注册的初级保健方面都有实践经验。研究结果强调了系统性挑战,包括基于注册的初级保健有限,医疗需求不断增加,这些都使WICs超出了其预期作用。这种错位造成了他们的结构和目的之间的紧张关系,导致参与者描述的就诊比初级保健更具事务性。这些限制——根源于缺乏信息和关系的连续性——往往限制了参与者提供深入参与或后续护理的能力。复诊往往与确保复杂或慢性疾病的连续性的努力有关。同样,参与者承认了抗生素处方可能不适当的现实,将其归因于高患者数量,满足患者期望的愿望,以及当疾病的性质存在问题时“谨慎行事”的倾向。调查结果强调了卫生系统的压力和善意的政策,如安大略省的初级保健获得奖金,如何产生意想不到的后果,包括获得不公平和跨环境的护理协调困难。为了应对这些挑战,需要进行改革,更好地将WICs与初级保健系统结合起来,同时进行针对性的培训,以支持医生在偶发性护理背景下做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes.

Designed for simplicity, used for complexity: The systemic pressures shaping walk-in clinic practices and outcomes.

Walk-in clinics (WICs), appreciated for their accessibility and convenience, have become an increasingly popular healthcare option in Ontario for patients with and without primary care enrolment. Despite their utility, WICs face criticism for delivering lower-quality care compared to comprehensive, enrolment-based primary care models. Critics argue that WICs contribute to system inefficiencies and encourage practice patterns misaligned with population health goals. This study explored physician perspectives on two key outcomes often associated with low-quality care in WICs: repeat primary care visits and potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Ontario-based family physicians (N = 19) who had experience practicing in both WICs and enrolment-based primary care. The findings highlight systemic challenges, including limited access to enrolment-based primary care and increasing healthcare demands, which have pushed WICs beyond their intended role. This misalignment has created tensions between their structure and purpose, resulting in visits that participants described as more transactional than those in primary care. These constraints-rooted in a lack of informational and relational continuity-often limited participants' ability to provide in-depth engagement or follow-up care. Repeat visits were frequently linked to efforts to ensure continuity for complex or chronic conditions. Similarly, participants acknowledged the reality of potentially inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, attributing it to the high patient volume, desire to satisfy patient expectations, and a tendency to "err on the side of caution" when the nature of the illness is in question. The findings underscore how health system pressures and well-intended policies, such as Ontario's primary care access bonus, can produce unintended consequences, including inequities in access and difficulties with care coordination across settings. Addressing these challenges requires reforms to better integrate WICs with the primary care system, alongside tailored training to support physician decision-making in episodic care contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信