有氧运动对癌症相关疲劳患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0325100
Tong Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Weicheng Li, Qiubo Zhang, Haoming Yan, Yongfeng Liu
{"title":"有氧运动对癌症相关疲劳患者的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Tong Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Weicheng Li, Qiubo Zhang, Haoming Yan, Yongfeng Liu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0325100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is characterized by an unusual and persistent sensation of tiredness that can occur during or after treatment, potentially impacting both physical and mental capability, and which does not ameliorate with rest. Aerobic exercise (AE) has been identified as a potent modality to mitigate the severity of CRF in such patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the efficacy of AE in alleviating CRF among patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was implemented on PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, and Embase until June 2024. Studies were selected based on the following PICOS criteria: Participants (P): cancer patients undergoing treatment or in recovery; Intervention (I): aerobic exercise, including activities such as walking, running, yoga, or tai chi; AE interventions conducted during both treatment and recovery were included. Comparison (C): usual care, no-treatment/wait-list, or attention/activity placebo controls; Outcome (O): cancer-related fatigue (CRF) measured by validated scales; Study design (S): randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that AE exerts a significant impact on CRF, but the heterogeneity is high (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.30 to -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 94%). Subgroup analysis revealed that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks (SMD = -1.12, 95% CI = -2.02 ~ -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 96%), 3 times or less per week (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI = -1.83 ~ -0.16, P < 0.05, I2 = 96%), with each session exceeding 60 minutes (SMD = -1.48, 95% CI = -2.32 ~ -0.64, P < 0.01, I2 = 96%), compared to the control group, significantly improve CRF in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research findings confirm the effectiveness of AE in alleviating CRF. Subgroup analysis further elucidated that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks, 3 times or less per week, with 60 minutes or more per session, significantly alleviated CRF among patients. However, given the limited number of included studies, caution is warranted in interpreting these subgroup analysis outcomes. The protocol for this review was duly registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024559098.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0325100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of aerobic exercise in patients with cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Wang, Jiaxin Deng, Weicheng Li, Qiubo Zhang, Haoming Yan, Yongfeng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0325100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is characterized by an unusual and persistent sensation of tiredness that can occur during or after treatment, potentially impacting both physical and mental capability, and which does not ameliorate with rest. Aerobic exercise (AE) has been identified as a potent modality to mitigate the severity of CRF in such patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the efficacy of AE in alleviating CRF among patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was implemented on PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, and Embase until June 2024. Studies were selected based on the following PICOS criteria: Participants (P): cancer patients undergoing treatment or in recovery; Intervention (I): aerobic exercise, including activities such as walking, running, yoga, or tai chi; AE interventions conducted during both treatment and recovery were included. Comparison (C): usual care, no-treatment/wait-list, or attention/activity placebo controls; Outcome (O): cancer-related fatigue (CRF) measured by validated scales; Study design (S): randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that AE exerts a significant impact on CRF, but the heterogeneity is high (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.30 to -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 94%). Subgroup analysis revealed that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks (SMD = -1.12, 95% CI = -2.02 ~ -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 96%), 3 times or less per week (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI = -1.83 ~ -0.16, P < 0.05, I2 = 96%), with each session exceeding 60 minutes (SMD = -1.48, 95% CI = -2.32 ~ -0.64, P < 0.01, I2 = 96%), compared to the control group, significantly improve CRF in patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The research findings confirm the effectiveness of AE in alleviating CRF. Subgroup analysis further elucidated that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks, 3 times or less per week, with 60 minutes or more per session, significantly alleviated CRF among patients. However, given the limited number of included studies, caution is warranted in interpreting these subgroup analysis outcomes. The protocol for this review was duly registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024559098.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0325100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325100\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325100","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:癌症相关疲劳(CRF)的特点是在治疗期间或治疗后出现一种不寻常的和持续的疲倦感,可能影响身体和精神能力,并且休息后不会改善。有氧运动(AE)已被确定为减轻此类患者CRF严重程度的有效方式。目的:探讨AE对慢性肾功能衰竭患者的缓解作用。方法:到2024年6月,在PubMed、Web of Science、EBSCO、Cochrane和Embase上进行全面的文献检索。根据以下PICOS标准选择研究:参与者(P):正在接受治疗或处于康复期的癌症患者;干预(I):有氧运动,包括散步、跑步、瑜伽或太极等活动;包括在治疗和恢复期间进行的AE干预。比较(C):常规护理,无治疗/等候名单,或注意力/活动安慰剂对照组;结果(O):通过验证的量表测量癌症相关疲劳(CRF);研究设计:随机对照试验(rct)。meta分析使用Review Manager 5.3进行。结果:结果显示AE对CRF有显著影响,但异质性较高(SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.30 ~ -0.22, P)。结论:研究结果证实AE对CRF有缓解作用。亚组分析进一步阐明,持续至少12周,每周3次或更少,每次60分钟或更长时间的AE干预可显著缓解患者的CRF。然而,考虑到纳入的研究数量有限,在解释这些亚组分析结果时需要谨慎。本次审查的方案已在PROSPERO上正式注册,注册号为CRD42024559098。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effects of aerobic exercise in patients with cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effects of aerobic exercise in patients with cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effects of aerobic exercise in patients with cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The effects of aerobic exercise in patients with cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is characterized by an unusual and persistent sensation of tiredness that can occur during or after treatment, potentially impacting both physical and mental capability, and which does not ameliorate with rest. Aerobic exercise (AE) has been identified as a potent modality to mitigate the severity of CRF in such patients.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of AE in alleviating CRF among patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was implemented on PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, and Embase until June 2024. Studies were selected based on the following PICOS criteria: Participants (P): cancer patients undergoing treatment or in recovery; Intervention (I): aerobic exercise, including activities such as walking, running, yoga, or tai chi; AE interventions conducted during both treatment and recovery were included. Comparison (C): usual care, no-treatment/wait-list, or attention/activity placebo controls; Outcome (O): cancer-related fatigue (CRF) measured by validated scales; Study design (S): randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: The results indicate that AE exerts a significant impact on CRF, but the heterogeneity is high (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.30 to -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 94%). Subgroup analysis revealed that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks (SMD = -1.12, 95% CI = -2.02 ~ -0.22, P < 0.05, I² = 96%), 3 times or less per week (SMD = -1.00, 95% CI = -1.83 ~ -0.16, P < 0.05, I2 = 96%), with each session exceeding 60 minutes (SMD = -1.48, 95% CI = -2.32 ~ -0.64, P < 0.01, I2 = 96%), compared to the control group, significantly improve CRF in patients.

Conclusion: The research findings confirm the effectiveness of AE in alleviating CRF. Subgroup analysis further elucidated that AE interventions lasting at least 12 weeks, 3 times or less per week, with 60 minutes or more per session, significantly alleviated CRF among patients. However, given the limited number of included studies, caution is warranted in interpreting these subgroup analysis outcomes. The protocol for this review was duly registered on PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42024559098.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信