东北小流域黑土层厚度预测及土壤侵蚀风险评价

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-06-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0324368
Keke Xu, Huimin Dai, Xujiao Zhang, Chaoqun Chen, Kai Liu, Guanxin Du, Cheng Qian
{"title":"东北小流域黑土层厚度预测及土壤侵蚀风险评价","authors":"Keke Xu, Huimin Dai, Xujiao Zhang, Chaoqun Chen, Kai Liu, Guanxin Du, Cheng Qian","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0324368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Black soil has good properties and high fertility. Understanding the spatial distribution of black soil layer thickness is of great significance in promoting regional agricultural development, ecological environmental protection, and soil erosion control. However, traditional soil investigation methods often fail to provide detailed soil thickness information. This study focuses on a small watershed in Northeast China's black soil region. By integrating topographical parameters and vegetation-climate indicators, random forest and kriging methods (classical bayesian, ordinary, and simple) were used to estimate the spatial distribution of thickness of black soil layer. An integrated evaluation framework was developed by combining RUSLE-derived erosion estimates with black soil layer thickness, systematically incorporating both external erosive forces and inherent soil erosion resistance attributes. The results show that the random forest model outperformed the kriging models, with smaller RMSE (34.05 cm) and larger R² (0.57), especially when handling nonlinear, high-dimensional data. The predicted thickness of the black soil layer ranged from 16.2 cm to 107 cm, with a mean of 48.31 cm, closely matching the measured value of 48 cm. Elevation (EL) was found to be the most significant factor affecting the thickness of black soil layer. Soil erosion risk assessment revealed that areas with no risk and low risk accounted for 21.91% and 62.21%, respectively, while medium and high-risk areas made up 15.87% and 0.01%. No-risk areas were soil accumulation zones, while low-risk areas were mainly sloped farmland, where measures like terracing, adjusting crop ridge directions, and planting pedunculated vegetation were recommended. Medium- and high-risk areas should be addressed by returning farmland to forests and implementing engineering practices. This study offers a reference for thickness of black soil layer estimation and provides valuable insights for soil erosion risk management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 6","pages":"e0324368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148179/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Black soil layer thickness prediction and soil erosion risk assessment in a small watershed in Northeast China.\",\"authors\":\"Keke Xu, Huimin Dai, Xujiao Zhang, Chaoqun Chen, Kai Liu, Guanxin Du, Cheng Qian\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0324368\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Black soil has good properties and high fertility. Understanding the spatial distribution of black soil layer thickness is of great significance in promoting regional agricultural development, ecological environmental protection, and soil erosion control. However, traditional soil investigation methods often fail to provide detailed soil thickness information. This study focuses on a small watershed in Northeast China's black soil region. By integrating topographical parameters and vegetation-climate indicators, random forest and kriging methods (classical bayesian, ordinary, and simple) were used to estimate the spatial distribution of thickness of black soil layer. An integrated evaluation framework was developed by combining RUSLE-derived erosion estimates with black soil layer thickness, systematically incorporating both external erosive forces and inherent soil erosion resistance attributes. The results show that the random forest model outperformed the kriging models, with smaller RMSE (34.05 cm) and larger R² (0.57), especially when handling nonlinear, high-dimensional data. The predicted thickness of the black soil layer ranged from 16.2 cm to 107 cm, with a mean of 48.31 cm, closely matching the measured value of 48 cm. Elevation (EL) was found to be the most significant factor affecting the thickness of black soil layer. Soil erosion risk assessment revealed that areas with no risk and low risk accounted for 21.91% and 62.21%, respectively, while medium and high-risk areas made up 15.87% and 0.01%. No-risk areas were soil accumulation zones, while low-risk areas were mainly sloped farmland, where measures like terracing, adjusting crop ridge directions, and planting pedunculated vegetation were recommended. Medium- and high-risk areas should be addressed by returning farmland to forests and implementing engineering practices. This study offers a reference for thickness of black soil layer estimation and provides valuable insights for soil erosion risk management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"e0324368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148179/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324368\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324368","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑土性质好,肥力高。了解黑土层厚的空间分布对促进区域农业发展、生态环境保护和水土流失防治具有重要意义。然而,传统的土壤调查方法往往不能提供详细的土壤厚度信息。本研究以东北黑土区小流域为研究对象。结合地形参数和植被气候指标,采用随机森林法和克里格法(经典贝叶斯法、普通法和简单法)估算黑土层厚度的空间分布。将rusle导出的侵蚀估计值与黑土层厚度相结合,系统地结合外部侵蚀力和土壤固有的抗侵蚀属性,构建了一个综合评估框架。结果表明,在处理非线性高维数据时,随机森林模型的RMSE较小(34.05 cm), R²较大(0.57),优于kriging模型。黑土层厚度预测范围为16.2 ~ 107 cm,平均值为48.31 cm,与实测值48 cm基本吻合。高程是影响黑土层厚度最显著的因素。土壤侵蚀风险评价显示,无风险区和低风险区分别占21.91%和62.21%,中风险区和高风险区分别占15.87%和0.01%。无风险区为土壤积累区,低风险区以坡耕地为主,建议采取梯田、调整作物垄向、种植带柄植被等措施。中高风险地区应通过退耕还林和实施工程实践来解决。该研究可为黑土层厚度估算提供参考,并为土壤侵蚀风险管理提供有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Black soil layer thickness prediction and soil erosion risk assessment in a small watershed in Northeast China.

Black soil layer thickness prediction and soil erosion risk assessment in a small watershed in Northeast China.

Black soil layer thickness prediction and soil erosion risk assessment in a small watershed in Northeast China.

Black soil layer thickness prediction and soil erosion risk assessment in a small watershed in Northeast China.

Black soil has good properties and high fertility. Understanding the spatial distribution of black soil layer thickness is of great significance in promoting regional agricultural development, ecological environmental protection, and soil erosion control. However, traditional soil investigation methods often fail to provide detailed soil thickness information. This study focuses on a small watershed in Northeast China's black soil region. By integrating topographical parameters and vegetation-climate indicators, random forest and kriging methods (classical bayesian, ordinary, and simple) were used to estimate the spatial distribution of thickness of black soil layer. An integrated evaluation framework was developed by combining RUSLE-derived erosion estimates with black soil layer thickness, systematically incorporating both external erosive forces and inherent soil erosion resistance attributes. The results show that the random forest model outperformed the kriging models, with smaller RMSE (34.05 cm) and larger R² (0.57), especially when handling nonlinear, high-dimensional data. The predicted thickness of the black soil layer ranged from 16.2 cm to 107 cm, with a mean of 48.31 cm, closely matching the measured value of 48 cm. Elevation (EL) was found to be the most significant factor affecting the thickness of black soil layer. Soil erosion risk assessment revealed that areas with no risk and low risk accounted for 21.91% and 62.21%, respectively, while medium and high-risk areas made up 15.87% and 0.01%. No-risk areas were soil accumulation zones, while low-risk areas were mainly sloped farmland, where measures like terracing, adjusting crop ridge directions, and planting pedunculated vegetation were recommended. Medium- and high-risk areas should be addressed by returning farmland to forests and implementing engineering practices. This study offers a reference for thickness of black soil layer estimation and provides valuable insights for soil erosion risk management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信