我们应该如何评价经胸超声心动图的质量:来自欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病学会(AEPC)成像工作组的一项调查结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Inga Voges, Massimiliano Cantinotti, Owen Miller, Gerald Greil, Heynric Grotenhuis, Almudena Ortiz-Garrido, Francesca Raimondi, Colin J McMahon
{"title":"我们应该如何评价经胸超声心动图的质量:来自欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病学会(AEPC)成像工作组的一项调查结果。","authors":"Inga Voges, Massimiliano Cantinotti, Owen Miller, Gerald Greil, Heynric Grotenhuis, Almudena Ortiz-Garrido, Francesca Raimondi, Colin J McMahon","doi":"10.1007/s00246-025-03914-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the current status about quality grading, resources, and training in pediatric echocardiography, to define gaps in this field, and to develop potential strategies for quality improvement. A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatric cardiologists within the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The questionnaire contained questions regarding assessment of quality, training and feedback in the field of pediatric echocardiography. Thirty-one European pediatric cardiologists from 17 countries participated. Most participants agreed (n = 28, 90%) that it is important to have standards for echocardiography quality grading for trainees. Objective instruments, however, are largely not available. Among a list of criteria on how to grade quality, quantitative or qualitative criteria with additional formative feedback was ranked highest by the respondents (53%). Although the correct diagnosis, followed by the correct use of two-dimensional (2D) imaging and the correct use of color Doppler across all valves and septae were listed as most important when performing transthoracic echocardiography, a matrix of the eight most important parameters was designed. The results show that quality grading in pediatric echocardiography varies highly among European centers. The matrix provided is a visual instrument whereby trainees can gauge the evolution in their skill as echocardiographers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19814,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Should We Grade the Quality of a Transthoracic Echocardiogram: Results from a Survey from the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Imaging Working Group.\",\"authors\":\"Inga Voges, Massimiliano Cantinotti, Owen Miller, Gerald Greil, Heynric Grotenhuis, Almudena Ortiz-Garrido, Francesca Raimondi, Colin J McMahon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00246-025-03914-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the current status about quality grading, resources, and training in pediatric echocardiography, to define gaps in this field, and to develop potential strategies for quality improvement. A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatric cardiologists within the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The questionnaire contained questions regarding assessment of quality, training and feedback in the field of pediatric echocardiography. Thirty-one European pediatric cardiologists from 17 countries participated. Most participants agreed (n = 28, 90%) that it is important to have standards for echocardiography quality grading for trainees. Objective instruments, however, are largely not available. Among a list of criteria on how to grade quality, quantitative or qualitative criteria with additional formative feedback was ranked highest by the respondents (53%). Although the correct diagnosis, followed by the correct use of two-dimensional (2D) imaging and the correct use of color Doppler across all valves and septae were listed as most important when performing transthoracic echocardiography, a matrix of the eight most important parameters was designed. The results show that quality grading in pediatric echocardiography varies highly among European centers. The matrix provided is a visual instrument whereby trainees can gauge the evolution in their skill as echocardiographers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03914-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-03914-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估儿童超声心动图质量分级、资源和培训的现状,确定该领域的差距,并制定潜在的质量改进策略。一份结构化的调查问卷发给了欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病学会(AEPC)的儿科心脏病专家。问卷包含了关于儿童超声心动图领域的质量评估、培训和反馈的问题。来自17个国家的31名欧洲儿科心脏病专家参与了研究。大多数参与者同意(n = 28,90 %)为受训者制定超声心动图质量分级标准是很重要的。然而,客观的工具在很大程度上是不可用的。在关于如何对质量进行评分的一系列标准中,受访者(53%)将带有额外形成性反馈的定量或定性标准排在首位。虽然在进行经胸超声心动图时,正确诊断、正确使用二维(2D)成像和正确使用彩色多普勒检查所有瓣膜和隔膜被认为是最重要的,但我们设计了一个包含8个最重要参数的矩阵。结果显示,欧洲各中心的儿童超声心动图质量分级差异很大。所提供的矩阵是一种视觉工具,受训者可以借此衡量他们作为超声心动图师的技能的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Should We Grade the Quality of a Transthoracic Echocardiogram: Results from a Survey from the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Imaging Working Group.

The aim of this study was to assess the current status about quality grading, resources, and training in pediatric echocardiography, to define gaps in this field, and to develop potential strategies for quality improvement. A structured questionnaire was sent out to pediatric cardiologists within the Association for European Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The questionnaire contained questions regarding assessment of quality, training and feedback in the field of pediatric echocardiography. Thirty-one European pediatric cardiologists from 17 countries participated. Most participants agreed (n = 28, 90%) that it is important to have standards for echocardiography quality grading for trainees. Objective instruments, however, are largely not available. Among a list of criteria on how to grade quality, quantitative or qualitative criteria with additional formative feedback was ranked highest by the respondents (53%). Although the correct diagnosis, followed by the correct use of two-dimensional (2D) imaging and the correct use of color Doppler across all valves and septae were listed as most important when performing transthoracic echocardiography, a matrix of the eight most important parameters was designed. The results show that quality grading in pediatric echocardiography varies highly among European centers. The matrix provided is a visual instrument whereby trainees can gauge the evolution in their skill as echocardiographers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Cardiology
Pediatric Cardiology 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
258
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The editor of Pediatric Cardiology welcomes original manuscripts concerning all aspects of heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, including embryology and anatomy, physiology and pharmacology, biochemistry, pathology, genetics, radiology, clinical aspects, investigative cardiology, electrophysiology and echocardiography, and cardiac surgery. Articles which may include original articles, review articles, letters to the editor etc., must be written in English and must be submitted solely to Pediatric Cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信