中强度他汀和依折替米贝联合治疗与高强度他汀单药治疗在心血管疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Q2 Medicine
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-11 DOI:10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.145
Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Umar, Farwa Zaidi, Maryam Sarwar Khan, M Chadi Alraies
{"title":"中强度他汀和依折替米贝联合治疗与高强度他汀单药治疗在心血管疾病患者中的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Umar, Farwa Zaidi, Maryam Sarwar Khan, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Statins represent the first-line therapy for cholesterol management. However, for patients prone to statin side effects, unable to tolerate higher doses, or requiring additional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, ezetimibe alone or in combination with statins is recommended. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining low- or moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, yielding reliable evidence to guide clinical decision-making and personalize treatment strategies. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until May 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a high-intensity statin with a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe were included. The outcomes of interest comprised changes in concentrations of lipids-LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TGs)-and apolipoprotein (Apo) A1, Apo B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), along with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4. <i>p</i>-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Overall, 20 RCTs, with 5,412 participants, were included. A low/moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe yielded a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy (mean difference [MD], -6.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.95, -2.24; <i>p</i>=0.003; I<sup>2</sup>=84%). No significant differences were observed between combination and high-intensity statin monotherapy regarding TC, TG, or HDL-C levels. However, hs-CRP levels were significantly higher with combination therapy (MD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.64; <i>p</i>=0.04; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Combination therapy involving a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe was significantly associated with lower LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy. No significant differences were observed for TC, TGs, HDL-C, alanine transaminase, or MACE. However, creatine phosphokinase levels significantly increased with monotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","volume":"14 2","pages":"145-158"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Farah Yasmin, Abdul Moeed, Muhammad Umar, Farwa Zaidi, Maryam Sarwar Khan, M Chadi Alraies\",\"doi\":\"10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Statins represent the first-line therapy for cholesterol management. However, for patients prone to statin side effects, unable to tolerate higher doses, or requiring additional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, ezetimibe alone or in combination with statins is recommended. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining low- or moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, yielding reliable evidence to guide clinical decision-making and personalize treatment strategies. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until May 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a high-intensity statin with a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe were included. The outcomes of interest comprised changes in concentrations of lipids-LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TGs)-and apolipoprotein (Apo) A1, Apo B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), along with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4. <i>p</i>-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Overall, 20 RCTs, with 5,412 participants, were included. A low/moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe yielded a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy (mean difference [MD], -6.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.95, -2.24; <i>p</i>=0.003; I<sup>2</sup>=84%). No significant differences were observed between combination and high-intensity statin monotherapy regarding TC, TG, or HDL-C levels. However, hs-CRP levels were significantly higher with combination therapy (MD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.64; <i>p</i>=0.04; I<sup>2</sup>=0%). Combination therapy involving a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe was significantly associated with lower LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy. No significant differences were observed for TC, TGs, HDL-C, alanine transaminase, or MACE. However, creatine phosphokinase levels significantly increased with monotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"145-158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12145961/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12997/jla.2025.14.2.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

他汀类药物是控制胆固醇的一线药物。然而,对于易发生他汀类药物副作用、不能耐受更高剂量或需要额外降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的患者,建议使用依折替米贝单独或与他汀类药物联合使用。本荟萃分析旨在评价低或中等强度他汀类药物联合依折替米比与高强度他汀类药物单药治疗的安全性和有效性,为指导临床决策和个性化治疗策略提供可靠证据。PubMed, Embase和Scopus从成立到2023年5月进行了系统检索。所有比较高强度他汀类药物与低/中强度他汀类药物与依折替米布的随机对照试验(rct)均被纳入。研究结果包括脂质(ldl - c、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)、总胆固醇(TC)、甘油三酯(tg)、载脂蛋白(Apo) A1、载脂蛋白B和高敏c反应蛋白(hs-CRP)浓度的变化,以及主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。所有数据使用Review Manager版本5.4进行分析。p值小于0.05认为具有统计学意义。总共纳入了20项随机对照试验,共有5412名参与者。低/中等强度的他汀类药物联合依折替米比高强度的他汀类药物单药治疗能显著降低LDL-C水平(平均差值[MD], -6.59;95%置信区间[CI], -10.95, -2.24;p = 0.003;I2 = 84%)。在TC、TG或HDL-C水平方面,联合和高强度他汀类药物单药治疗之间没有观察到显著差异。然而,联合治疗组hs-CRP水平明显升高(MD, 0.32;95% ci, 0.01, 0.64;p = 0.04;I2 = 0%)。与高强度他汀类药物单药治疗相比,低/中等强度他汀类药物与依折替布联合治疗与较低的LDL-C水平显著相关。TC、tg、HDL-C、丙氨酸转氨酶或MACE均无显著差异。然而,肌酸磷酸激酶水平在单药治疗中显著升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Moderate-Intensity Statin and Ezetimibe Combination Therapy Versus High-Intensity Statin Monotherapy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Statins represent the first-line therapy for cholesterol management. However, for patients prone to statin side effects, unable to tolerate higher doses, or requiring additional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction, ezetimibe alone or in combination with statins is recommended. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining low- or moderate-intensity statins with ezetimibe compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy, yielding reliable evidence to guide clinical decision-making and personalize treatment strategies. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were systematically searched from inception until May 2023. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing a high-intensity statin with a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe were included. The outcomes of interest comprised changes in concentrations of lipids-LDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TGs)-and apolipoprotein (Apo) A1, Apo B, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), along with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All data were analyzed using Review Manager version 5.4. p-values less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Overall, 20 RCTs, with 5,412 participants, were included. A low/moderate-intensity statin combined with ezetimibe yielded a significantly greater reduction in LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy (mean difference [MD], -6.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.95, -2.24; p=0.003; I2=84%). No significant differences were observed between combination and high-intensity statin monotherapy regarding TC, TG, or HDL-C levels. However, hs-CRP levels were significantly higher with combination therapy (MD, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01, 0.64; p=0.04; I2=0%). Combination therapy involving a low/moderate-intensity statin with ezetimibe was significantly associated with lower LDL-C levels than high-intensity statin monotherapy. No significant differences were observed for TC, TGs, HDL-C, alanine transaminase, or MACE. However, creatine phosphokinase levels significantly increased with monotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis
Journal of Lipid and Atherosclerosis Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信