心智化小片段任务的发展与初步验证:跨关系情境的心智化测量。

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Sheetal Lakhani, Poornima Bhola, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai
{"title":"心智化小片段任务的发展与初步验证:跨关系情境的心智化测量。","authors":"Sheetal Lakhani, Poornima Bhola, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai","doi":"10.1080/00223891.2025.2509501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mentalizing is a potentially transdiagnostic construct with important implications for the emotional and interpersonal functioning of individuals with mental health vulnerabilities. The multidimensional and dynamic qualities of mentalizing warrant clinically and contextually relevant assessment grounded in diverse interpersonal situations. We developed the Mentalizing Vignettes Task (MVT), a vignette-based, multiple-choice measure of mentalizing across various relationship domains (e.g., friendship, family, romantic). Study 1 focused on the development, content validation, and item analysis of the MVT-30 with a community sample (<i>n</i> = 120), resulting in a refined 24-item version (MVT-24). Study 2 assessed the internal consistency, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and concurrent validity of the MVT-24 against other measures of mentalizing and related constructs across three groups: borderline personality disorder (<i>n</i> = 37), somatoform disorder (<i>n</i> = 40), and community controls (<i>n</i> = 37). The measure demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80) and content validity (Scale-CVI = 0.98) with preliminary evidence of convergent and concurrent validity through expected associations with uncertainty in reflective functioning, self-mentalizing, processing emotions, attachment anxiety, and interpersonal functioning. MVT-24 also differentiated the clinical groups from the control, supporting its known-groups validity (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.12). The current study introduces a brief, context-sensitive tool for assessing mentalizing, with promising implications for clinical formulation and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":16707,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality assessment","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Preliminary Validation of the Mentalizing Vignettes Task: A Measure of Mentalizing Across Relational Contexts.\",\"authors\":\"Sheetal Lakhani, Poornima Bhola, Urvakhsh Meherwan Mehta, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00223891.2025.2509501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mentalizing is a potentially transdiagnostic construct with important implications for the emotional and interpersonal functioning of individuals with mental health vulnerabilities. The multidimensional and dynamic qualities of mentalizing warrant clinically and contextually relevant assessment grounded in diverse interpersonal situations. We developed the Mentalizing Vignettes Task (MVT), a vignette-based, multiple-choice measure of mentalizing across various relationship domains (e.g., friendship, family, romantic). Study 1 focused on the development, content validation, and item analysis of the MVT-30 with a community sample (<i>n</i> = 120), resulting in a refined 24-item version (MVT-24). Study 2 assessed the internal consistency, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and concurrent validity of the MVT-24 against other measures of mentalizing and related constructs across three groups: borderline personality disorder (<i>n</i> = 37), somatoform disorder (<i>n</i> = 40), and community controls (<i>n</i> = 37). The measure demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80) and content validity (Scale-CVI = 0.98) with preliminary evidence of convergent and concurrent validity through expected associations with uncertainty in reflective functioning, self-mentalizing, processing emotions, attachment anxiety, and interpersonal functioning. MVT-24 also differentiated the clinical groups from the control, supporting its known-groups validity (Cohen's <i>d</i> = 1.12). The current study introduces a brief, context-sensitive tool for assessing mentalizing, with promising implications for clinical formulation and intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of personality assessment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of personality assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2509501\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality assessment","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2025.2509501","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

心理化是一种潜在的跨诊断结构,对心理健康脆弱个体的情感和人际功能具有重要意义。心理化的多维性和动态性要求在不同的人际关系情境中进行临床和情境相关的评估。我们开发了Mentalizing Vignettes Task (MVT),这是一种基于Vignettes的多项选择测量,用于在各种关系领域(如友谊、家庭、浪漫)进行心理化。研究1的重点是MVT-30的开发、内容验证和项目分析与社区样本(n = 120),产生了一个精炼的24项版本(MVT-24)。研究2评估了MVT-24的内部一致性、收敛效度、已知组效度和并发效度,对比了三组心理化和相关结构的其他测量:边缘型人格障碍(n = 37)、躯体形式障碍(n = 40)和社区对照(n = 37)。该量表显示了足够的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.80)和内容效度(量表- cvi = 0.98),初步证据表明,通过与不确定性在反思功能、自我心理化、处理情绪、依恋焦虑和人际功能方面的预期关联,具有收敛效度和并发效度。MVT-24还将临床组与对照组区分开来,支持其已知组效度(Cohen’s d = 1.12)。目前的研究介绍了一个简短的,上下文敏感的工具来评估心智化,对临床制定和干预有希望的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Preliminary Validation of the Mentalizing Vignettes Task: A Measure of Mentalizing Across Relational Contexts.

Mentalizing is a potentially transdiagnostic construct with important implications for the emotional and interpersonal functioning of individuals with mental health vulnerabilities. The multidimensional and dynamic qualities of mentalizing warrant clinically and contextually relevant assessment grounded in diverse interpersonal situations. We developed the Mentalizing Vignettes Task (MVT), a vignette-based, multiple-choice measure of mentalizing across various relationship domains (e.g., friendship, family, romantic). Study 1 focused on the development, content validation, and item analysis of the MVT-30 with a community sample (n = 120), resulting in a refined 24-item version (MVT-24). Study 2 assessed the internal consistency, convergent validity, known-groups validity, and concurrent validity of the MVT-24 against other measures of mentalizing and related constructs across three groups: borderline personality disorder (n = 37), somatoform disorder (n = 40), and community controls (n = 37). The measure demonstrated adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80) and content validity (Scale-CVI = 0.98) with preliminary evidence of convergent and concurrent validity through expected associations with uncertainty in reflective functioning, self-mentalizing, processing emotions, attachment anxiety, and interpersonal functioning. MVT-24 also differentiated the clinical groups from the control, supporting its known-groups validity (Cohen's d = 1.12). The current study introduces a brief, context-sensitive tool for assessing mentalizing, with promising implications for clinical formulation and intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: The Journal of Personality Assessment (JPA) primarily publishes articles dealing with the development, evaluation, refinement, and application of personality assessment methods. Desirable articles address empirical, theoretical, instructional, or professional aspects of using psychological tests, interview data, or the applied clinical assessment process. They also advance the measurement, description, or understanding of personality, psychopathology, and human behavior. JPA is broadly concerned with developing and using personality assessment methods in clinical, counseling, forensic, and health psychology settings; with the assessment process in applied clinical practice; with the assessment of people of all ages and cultures; and with both normal and abnormal personality functioning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信