头孢曲松每日2g vs每日1g治疗住院肺炎患者的结局:一项全国性回顾性队列研究

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"头孢曲松每日2g vs每日1g治疗住院肺炎患者的结局:一项全国性回顾性队列研究","authors":"Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ceftriaxone is widely used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but its optimal dosage remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with pneumonia between July 2010 and March 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan. They were categorized into those receiving 2 or 1 g/day of ceftriaxone within the first 2 days of hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (composite of biliary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile infection and allergic reactions) and each adverse event. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis was used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 471 694 eligible patients, 63.3% received 2 g/day and 36.7% received 1 g/day of ceftriaxone. Propensity-score analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between the two groups [4.5% versus 4.6%; risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3% to 0.1%; P = 0.219]. Overall adverse events were slightly higher in the 2 g/day group (1.9% versus 1.8%; RD, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%; P = 0.007), particularly the proportion of C. difficile infection. In the subgroup analysis of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the 2 g/day regimen was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.2% versus 20.4%; RD, -3.2%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -0.9%; P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While a ceftriaxone dose exceeding 1 g/day may not be necessary for routine pneumonia treatment, a 2 g/day regimen may be considered for patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of ceftriaxone 2 g versus 1 g daily in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Jumpei Taniguchi, Shotaro Aso, Hiroki Matsui, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jac/dkaf189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ceftriaxone is widely used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but its optimal dosage remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with pneumonia between July 2010 and March 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan. They were categorized into those receiving 2 or 1 g/day of ceftriaxone within the first 2 days of hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (composite of biliary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile infection and allergic reactions) and each adverse event. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis was used for comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 471 694 eligible patients, 63.3% received 2 g/day and 36.7% received 1 g/day of ceftriaxone. Propensity-score analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between the two groups [4.5% versus 4.6%; risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3% to 0.1%; P = 0.219]. Overall adverse events were slightly higher in the 2 g/day group (1.9% versus 1.8%; RD, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%; P = 0.007), particularly the proportion of C. difficile infection. In the subgroup analysis of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the 2 g/day regimen was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.2% versus 20.4%; RD, -3.2%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -0.9%; P = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While a ceftriaxone dose exceeding 1 g/day may not be necessary for routine pneumonia treatment, a 2 g/day regimen may be considered for patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf189\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:头孢曲松广泛用于社区获得性肺炎住院患者,但其最佳剂量尚不清楚。方法:我们回顾性地从2010年7月至2022年3月期间日本诊断程序组合住院患者数据库中诊断为肺炎的患者。他们在住院头2天内接受2 g或1 g/天的头孢曲松治疗。主要终点是30天住院死亡率。次要结局包括总体不良事件(胆道感染、艰难梭菌感染和过敏反应的组合)和每个不良事件。对需要机械通气的患者进行亚组分析。倾向得分重叠加权分析用于比较。结果:在47694例符合条件的患者中,63.3%的患者使用头孢曲松2 g/d, 36.7%的患者使用头孢曲松1 g/d。倾向评分分析显示,两组住院30天死亡率无显著差异[4.5%对4.6%;风险差(RD), -0.1%;95%置信区间(CI), -0.3% ~ 0.1%;p = 0.219]。总的不良事件在2 g/d组略高(1.9% vs 1.8%;理查德·道金斯,0.1%;95% ci, 0.0%-0.2%;P = 0.007),尤其是难辨梭菌感染的比例。在需要机械通气的患者的亚组分析中,2g /天方案与较低的30天死亡率相关(17.2% vs 20.4%;理查德·道金斯,-3.2%;95% CI, -5.6% ~ -0.9%;p = 0.006)。结论:虽然头孢曲松剂量超过1g /天可能不是常规肺炎治疗的必要剂量,但对于需要机械通气的重症肺炎患者,可以考虑2g /天的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of ceftriaxone 2 g versus 1 g daily in hospitalized patients with pneumonia: a nationwide retrospective cohort study.

Objectives: Ceftriaxone is widely used for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia, but its optimal dosage remains unclear.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients diagnosed with pneumonia between July 2010 and March 2022 from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database in Japan. They were categorized into those receiving 2 or 1 g/day of ceftriaxone within the first 2 days of hospitalization. The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes included overall adverse events (composite of biliary tract infection, Clostridioides difficile infection and allergic reactions) and each adverse event. A subgroup analysis was conducted for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Propensity-score overlap-weighting analysis was used for comparisons.

Results: Among the 471 694 eligible patients, 63.3% received 2 g/day and 36.7% received 1 g/day of ceftriaxone. Propensity-score analysis showed no significant difference in 30-day in-hospital mortality between the two groups [4.5% versus 4.6%; risk difference (RD), -0.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -0.3% to 0.1%; P = 0.219]. Overall adverse events were slightly higher in the 2 g/day group (1.9% versus 1.8%; RD, 0.1%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.2%; P = 0.007), particularly the proportion of C. difficile infection. In the subgroup analysis of patients requiring mechanical ventilation, the 2 g/day regimen was associated with lower 30-day mortality (17.2% versus 20.4%; RD, -3.2%; 95% CI, -5.6% to -0.9%; P = 0.006).

Conclusions: While a ceftriaxone dose exceeding 1 g/day may not be necessary for routine pneumonia treatment, a 2 g/day regimen may be considered for patients with severe pneumonia requiring mechanical ventilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信