机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的术中低血压:一项随机对照试验,比较标准目标定向液体治疗和低血压预测指数引导的目标定向液体治疗。

IF 6.8 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Cotoia Antonella, Antonello Discenza, Michela Rauseo, Mario Matella, Girolamo Caggianelli, Rossana Ciaramelletti, Lucia Mirabella, Gilda Cinnella
{"title":"机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中的术中低血压:一项随机对照试验,比较标准目标定向液体治疗和低血压预测指数引导的目标定向液体治疗。","authors":"Cotoia Antonella, Antonello Discenza, Michela Rauseo, Mario Matella, Girolamo Caggianelli, Rossana Ciaramelletti, Lucia Mirabella, Gilda Cinnella","doi":"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents the leading application of robotic surgery in the treatment for prostate cancer with faster recovery and reduced invasiveness. Maintaining stable blood pressure during RARP is crucial to avoid complications. The approach used is goal-directed therapy (GDT); however, the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning algorithm that analyses arterial waveforms, may provide additional benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cumulative amount, frequency and duration of intraoperative hypotension episodes in patients undergoing RARP, comparing those managed with a GDT protocol guided by the HPI algorithm versus those managed without it.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-centre university hospital. Recruitment from January 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-two patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients undergoing RARP were randomly assigned to either a GDT protocol alone (control) or a GDT protocol guided by the HPI (HPI group). All patients received both general anaesthesia and a single-shot spinal technique.</p><p><strong>Mean outcome measures: </strong>Cumulative amount of intraoperative hypotension [measured using the time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg]; frequency of hypotensive events; duration of hypotensive events; postoperative complications; length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed in TWA-MAP, or in the frequency and duration of hypotensive events between the groups. Both groups maintained stable haemodynamics with minimal hypotension, and had similar fluid infusion and vasoconstrictor administration. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative complications or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, HPI guidance did not reduce intraoperative hypotension during RARP. Interestingly, the control group experienced fewer hypotensive events than typically reported in the literature, likely because of the high standards of haemodynamic and anaesthesiologic management maintained across both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06535464.</p>","PeriodicalId":11920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative hypotension during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial comparing standard goal-directed fluid therapy with hypotension prediction index-guided goal-directed fluid therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Cotoia Antonella, Antonello Discenza, Michela Rauseo, Mario Matella, Girolamo Caggianelli, Rossana Ciaramelletti, Lucia Mirabella, Gilda Cinnella\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents the leading application of robotic surgery in the treatment for prostate cancer with faster recovery and reduced invasiveness. Maintaining stable blood pressure during RARP is crucial to avoid complications. The approach used is goal-directed therapy (GDT); however, the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning algorithm that analyses arterial waveforms, may provide additional benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the cumulative amount, frequency and duration of intraoperative hypotension episodes in patients undergoing RARP, comparing those managed with a GDT protocol guided by the HPI algorithm versus those managed without it.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective randomised study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-centre university hospital. Recruitment from January 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Eighty-two patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients undergoing RARP were randomly assigned to either a GDT protocol alone (control) or a GDT protocol guided by the HPI (HPI group). All patients received both general anaesthesia and a single-shot spinal technique.</p><p><strong>Mean outcome measures: </strong>Cumulative amount of intraoperative hypotension [measured using the time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg]; frequency of hypotensive events; duration of hypotensive events; postoperative complications; length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No differences were observed in TWA-MAP, or in the frequency and duration of hypotensive events between the groups. Both groups maintained stable haemodynamics with minimal hypotension, and had similar fluid infusion and vasoconstrictor administration. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative complications or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our study, HPI guidance did not reduce intraoperative hypotension during RARP. Interestingly, the control group experienced fewer hypotensive events than typically reported in the literature, likely because of the high standards of haemodynamic and anaesthesiologic management maintained across both groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06535464.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000002211","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)代表了机器人手术在前列腺癌治疗中的领先应用,具有更快的恢复和更低的侵袭性。在RARP期间保持血压稳定对避免并发症至关重要。使用的方法是目标导向治疗(GDT);然而,低血压预测指数(HPI),一种分析动脉波形的机器学习算法,可能会提供额外的好处。目的:评估RARP患者术中低血压发作的累积量、频率和持续时间,比较采用HPI算法指导的GDT方案的患者与未采用GDT方案的患者。设计:前瞻性随机研究。环境:单中心大学医院2022年1月至2023年4月招聘。参与者:82例患者。干预措施:接受RARP的患者被随机分配到单独的GDT方案(对照组)或由HPI指导的GDT方案(HPI组)。所有患者均接受全身麻醉和单针脊柱技术。平均结局指标:术中低血压的累计量[使用平均动脉压(MAP)低于65 mmHg的时间加权平均值(TWA)测量];低血压事件发生频率;低血压事件持续时间;术后并发症;停留时间。结果:两组间TWA-MAP、低血压事件发生频率和持续时间均无差异。两组血流动力学稳定,低血压,输液和血管收缩剂使用相似。此外,术后并发症和住院时间也没有差异。结论:在我们的研究中,HPI指导并没有降低RARP术中低血压。有趣的是,对照组发生的低血压事件比文献中通常报道的要少,可能是因为两组都保持了高标准的血流动力学和麻醉管理。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT06535464。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraoperative hypotension during robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised controlled trial comparing standard goal-directed fluid therapy with hypotension prediction index-guided goal-directed fluid therapy.

Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents the leading application of robotic surgery in the treatment for prostate cancer with faster recovery and reduced invasiveness. Maintaining stable blood pressure during RARP is crucial to avoid complications. The approach used is goal-directed therapy (GDT); however, the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI), a machine learning algorithm that analyses arterial waveforms, may provide additional benefits.

Objective: To evaluate the cumulative amount, frequency and duration of intraoperative hypotension episodes in patients undergoing RARP, comparing those managed with a GDT protocol guided by the HPI algorithm versus those managed without it.

Design: Prospective randomised study.

Setting: Single-centre university hospital. Recruitment from January 2022 to April 2023.

Participants: Eighty-two patients.

Interventions: Patients undergoing RARP were randomly assigned to either a GDT protocol alone (control) or a GDT protocol guided by the HPI (HPI group). All patients received both general anaesthesia and a single-shot spinal technique.

Mean outcome measures: Cumulative amount of intraoperative hypotension [measured using the time-weighted average (TWA) of mean arterial pressure (MAP) below 65 mmHg]; frequency of hypotensive events; duration of hypotensive events; postoperative complications; length of stay.

Results: No differences were observed in TWA-MAP, or in the frequency and duration of hypotensive events between the groups. Both groups maintained stable haemodynamics with minimal hypotension, and had similar fluid infusion and vasoconstrictor administration. Additionally, there were no differences in postoperative complications or length of stay.

Conclusions: In our study, HPI guidance did not reduce intraoperative hypotension during RARP. Interestingly, the control group experienced fewer hypotensive events than typically reported in the literature, likely because of the high standards of haemodynamic and anaesthesiologic management maintained across both groups.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT06535464.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
351
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA) publishes original work of high scientific quality in the field of anaesthesiology, pain, emergency medicine and intensive care. Preference is given to experimental work or clinical observation in man, and to laboratory work of clinical relevance. The journal also publishes commissioned reviews by an authority, editorials, invited commentaries, special articles, pro and con debates, and short reports (correspondences, case reports, short reports of clinical studies).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信