Marco David Bokobza De la Rosa, Matti Jubouri, Thurkga Moothathamby, Mohamed Refaie, Ali Murtada, Idhrees Mohammed, Ian M Williams, Damian M Bailey, Mohamad Bashir
{"title":"年轻患者钝性外伤性主动脉损伤后胸腔血管内主动脉修复后的主动脉和心血管重构:生理和临床结果的叙述性回顾","authors":"Marco David Bokobza De la Rosa, Matti Jubouri, Thurkga Moothathamby, Mohamed Refaie, Ali Murtada, Idhrees Mohammed, Ian M Williams, Damian M Bailey, Mohamad Bashir","doi":"10.1113/EP092615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is severe, often fatal in younger populations due to high-energy deceleration mechanisms. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has revolutionised BTAI treatment, surpassing the previously standard open surgical repair in mortality and complication rates. Despite its success, concerns arise regarding TEVAR's long-term effects, especially in younger BTAI patients. Key physiological changes following TEVAR include alterations in aortic size, shape, compliance and flow dynamics, leading to loss of the Windkessel effect and a consequent increased pulse wave velocity and decreased radial strain, which can contribute to the development of hypertension. These alterations also predispose patients to changes in cardiovascular flow (increased reverse systolic flow, reduced maximum velocity and altered helical flow), potentially increasing the risk of left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Physiological changes also increase the likelihood of complications such as graft migration. Clinical outcomes of TEVAR for BTAI have generally been favourable, with significant reductions in mortality and cerebrovascular accident rates compared to open surgical repair. However, long-term complications, including the need for re-interventions, remain a concern, though studies suggest these are infrequent. The durability of TEVAR in younger patients, who may experience decades of device use, poses unique challenges, particularly due to the natural progression of aortic morphology over time. Therefore, adapting TEVAR to the physiological needs of younger BTAI patients is essential. Developing more compliant endografts and using shorter stents with improved materials can help minimise structural and haemodynamic changes and enhance cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the long-term health of this vulnerable population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12092,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic and cardiovascular remodelling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt traumatic aortic injury in younger patients: A narrative review of physiological and clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Marco David Bokobza De la Rosa, Matti Jubouri, Thurkga Moothathamby, Mohamed Refaie, Ali Murtada, Idhrees Mohammed, Ian M Williams, Damian M Bailey, Mohamad Bashir\",\"doi\":\"10.1113/EP092615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is severe, often fatal in younger populations due to high-energy deceleration mechanisms. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has revolutionised BTAI treatment, surpassing the previously standard open surgical repair in mortality and complication rates. Despite its success, concerns arise regarding TEVAR's long-term effects, especially in younger BTAI patients. Key physiological changes following TEVAR include alterations in aortic size, shape, compliance and flow dynamics, leading to loss of the Windkessel effect and a consequent increased pulse wave velocity and decreased radial strain, which can contribute to the development of hypertension. These alterations also predispose patients to changes in cardiovascular flow (increased reverse systolic flow, reduced maximum velocity and altered helical flow), potentially increasing the risk of left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Physiological changes also increase the likelihood of complications such as graft migration. Clinical outcomes of TEVAR for BTAI have generally been favourable, with significant reductions in mortality and cerebrovascular accident rates compared to open surgical repair. However, long-term complications, including the need for re-interventions, remain a concern, though studies suggest these are infrequent. The durability of TEVAR in younger patients, who may experience decades of device use, poses unique challenges, particularly due to the natural progression of aortic morphology over time. Therefore, adapting TEVAR to the physiological needs of younger BTAI patients is essential. Developing more compliant endografts and using shorter stents with improved materials can help minimise structural and haemodynamic changes and enhance cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the long-term health of this vulnerable population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092615\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1113/EP092615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aortic and cardiovascular remodelling after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for blunt traumatic aortic injury in younger patients: A narrative review of physiological and clinical outcomes.
Blunt traumatic aortic injury (BTAI) is severe, often fatal in younger populations due to high-energy deceleration mechanisms. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has revolutionised BTAI treatment, surpassing the previously standard open surgical repair in mortality and complication rates. Despite its success, concerns arise regarding TEVAR's long-term effects, especially in younger BTAI patients. Key physiological changes following TEVAR include alterations in aortic size, shape, compliance and flow dynamics, leading to loss of the Windkessel effect and a consequent increased pulse wave velocity and decreased radial strain, which can contribute to the development of hypertension. These alterations also predispose patients to changes in cardiovascular flow (increased reverse systolic flow, reduced maximum velocity and altered helical flow), potentially increasing the risk of left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease. Physiological changes also increase the likelihood of complications such as graft migration. Clinical outcomes of TEVAR for BTAI have generally been favourable, with significant reductions in mortality and cerebrovascular accident rates compared to open surgical repair. However, long-term complications, including the need for re-interventions, remain a concern, though studies suggest these are infrequent. The durability of TEVAR in younger patients, who may experience decades of device use, poses unique challenges, particularly due to the natural progression of aortic morphology over time. Therefore, adapting TEVAR to the physiological needs of younger BTAI patients is essential. Developing more compliant endografts and using shorter stents with improved materials can help minimise structural and haemodynamic changes and enhance cardiovascular outcomes, supporting the long-term health of this vulnerable population.
期刊介绍:
Experimental Physiology publishes research papers that report novel insights into homeostatic and adaptive responses in health, as well as those that further our understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms in disease. We encourage papers that embrace the journal’s orientation of translation and integration, including studies of the adaptive responses to exercise, acute and chronic environmental stressors, growth and aging, and diseases where integrative homeostatic mechanisms play a key role in the response to and evolution of the disease process. Examples of such diseases include hypertension, heart failure, hypoxic lung disease, endocrine and neurological disorders. We are also keen to publish research that has a translational aspect or clinical application. Comparative physiology work that can be applied to aid the understanding human physiology is also encouraged.
Manuscripts that report the use of bioinformatic, genomic, molecular, proteomic and cellular techniques to provide novel insights into integrative physiological and pathophysiological mechanisms are welcomed.