质子泵抑制剂降低卡培他滨治疗患者的生存结局:荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-03-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1868
Dina Mohyeldeen, Waleed Arafat
{"title":"质子泵抑制剂降低卡培他滨治疗患者的生存结局:荟萃分析。","authors":"Dina Mohyeldeen, Waleed Arafat","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used over-the-counter drugs. The interaction between capecitabine and PPIs is still ambiguous within the literature, with some discrepancies still being present regarding the risks, or benefits, of their concomitant use. This meta-analysis aims to analyse data from the literature regarding both the risk of PPIs on survival in patients treated with capecitabine, as well as their benefits regarding the incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). A total of 17 studies were included after searching PubMed, Medline and Cochrane until October 2022 for the effect of PPIs on the treatment efficacy and pharmacokinetics, and incidence of HFS. Revman Ver. 5.3 was used for all statistical analyses. Our data showed a significant HFS reduction at a relative risk of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-085; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) in the PPI-using groups compared to control. Meta-analysis of studies assessing survival, however, showed a reduction in almost all survival aspects, most notably within the recurrence-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.75; 95% CI: 1.21-2.53; <i>p</i> = 0.003. Individual data incriminating the use of PPIs with capecitabine is quite limited; however, our robust survival data on around 30,000 patients gave significantly worse survival outcomes, particularly in the (neo)adjuvant setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1868"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proton pump inhibitors reduce survival outcomes in patients treated with capecitabine: meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dina Mohyeldeen, Waleed Arafat\",\"doi\":\"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1868\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used over-the-counter drugs. The interaction between capecitabine and PPIs is still ambiguous within the literature, with some discrepancies still being present regarding the risks, or benefits, of their concomitant use. This meta-analysis aims to analyse data from the literature regarding both the risk of PPIs on survival in patients treated with capecitabine, as well as their benefits regarding the incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). A total of 17 studies were included after searching PubMed, Medline and Cochrane until October 2022 for the effect of PPIs on the treatment efficacy and pharmacokinetics, and incidence of HFS. Revman Ver. 5.3 was used for all statistical analyses. Our data showed a significant HFS reduction at a relative risk of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-085; <i>p</i> < 0.00001) in the PPI-using groups compared to control. Meta-analysis of studies assessing survival, however, showed a reduction in almost all survival aspects, most notably within the recurrence-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.75; 95% CI: 1.21-2.53; <i>p</i> = 0.003. Individual data incriminating the use of PPIs with capecitabine is quite limited; however, our robust survival data on around 30,000 patients gave significantly worse survival outcomes, particularly in the (neo)adjuvant setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1868\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ecancermedicalscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1868\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是广泛使用的非处方药。卡培他滨和质子泵抑制剂之间的相互作用在文献中仍然是模糊的,关于它们同时使用的风险或益处仍然存在一些差异。本荟萃分析旨在分析来自文献的数据,这些数据涉及卡培他滨治疗患者发生ppi对生存的风险,以及它们对手足综合征(HFS)发生率的益处。截至2022年10月,通过PubMed、Medline和Cochrane检索PPIs对治疗疗效、药代动力学和HFS发生率的影响,共纳入17项研究。所有统计分析均采用Revman 5.3版本。我们的数据显示HFS显著降低,相对风险为0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-085;p < 0.00001)。然而,对评估生存率的研究的荟萃分析显示,几乎所有生存率方面都有所降低,最显著的是在无复发生存率方面,风险比为1.75;95% ci: 1.21-2.53;P = 0.003。与卡培他滨一起使用ppi的个人数据相当有限;然而,我们对约30,000名患者的可靠生存数据显示生存结果明显较差,特别是在(新)辅助治疗中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proton pump inhibitors reduce survival outcomes in patients treated with capecitabine: meta-analysis.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used over-the-counter drugs. The interaction between capecitabine and PPIs is still ambiguous within the literature, with some discrepancies still being present regarding the risks, or benefits, of their concomitant use. This meta-analysis aims to analyse data from the literature regarding both the risk of PPIs on survival in patients treated with capecitabine, as well as their benefits regarding the incidence of hand-foot syndrome (HFS). A total of 17 studies were included after searching PubMed, Medline and Cochrane until October 2022 for the effect of PPIs on the treatment efficacy and pharmacokinetics, and incidence of HFS. Revman Ver. 5.3 was used for all statistical analyses. Our data showed a significant HFS reduction at a relative risk of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.70-085; p < 0.00001) in the PPI-using groups compared to control. Meta-analysis of studies assessing survival, however, showed a reduction in almost all survival aspects, most notably within the recurrence-free survival, with a hazard ratio of 1.75; 95% CI: 1.21-2.53; p = 0.003. Individual data incriminating the use of PPIs with capecitabine is quite limited; however, our robust survival data on around 30,000 patients gave significantly worse survival outcomes, particularly in the (neo)adjuvant setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信