神经精神症状和阿尔茨海默病严重程度。关注性别差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Antonina Luca, Maria Luca, Alessandro Serretti
{"title":"神经精神症状和阿尔茨海默病严重程度。关注性别差异。","authors":"Antonina Luca, Maria Luca, Alessandro Serretti","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2025.2518093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sex predictors in the severity of NPS in a large cohort of patients with AD and to assess the role of severity in sex-related differences in NPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-four participants (295 women, mean age 78.4 ± 8.3 years, mean disease duration 7.4 ± 8.5 years) were included with a diagnosis of AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria. Clinical data and presence of NPS were collected from family interview, medical records, and patient interview and examination. Dementia severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS) extended version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDRS score was available for 407 participants (mean score 2.6 ± 1.1); 407 (22.1%) patients had CRDS = 1, 104 (25.5%) had CRDS = 2, 127 (31.2%) had CRDS = 3, 64 (15.7%) had CDRS = 4 and 22 (15.4%) had CDRS = 5. Apathy (85.7%), agitation or restlessness (75.1%) and paranoia (59.4%) were the most common NPS. Higher CDRS scores were associated with several neuropsychiatric features, including apathy, wandering and physical aggression. In the sex-stratified analysis, NPS were associated with more severe AD only in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest relevant sex differences in NPS with increasing severity.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A timely and targeted behavioral management could improve treatment outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Alzheimer's Disease Severity. A Focus on Sex-Differences.\",\"authors\":\"Antonina Luca, Maria Luca, Alessandro Serretti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07317115.2025.2518093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sex predictors in the severity of NPS in a large cohort of patients with AD and to assess the role of severity in sex-related differences in NPS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred and twenty-four participants (295 women, mean age 78.4 ± 8.3 years, mean disease duration 7.4 ± 8.5 years) were included with a diagnosis of AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria. Clinical data and presence of NPS were collected from family interview, medical records, and patient interview and examination. Dementia severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS) extended version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CDRS score was available for 407 participants (mean score 2.6 ± 1.1); 407 (22.1%) patients had CRDS = 1, 104 (25.5%) had CRDS = 2, 127 (31.2%) had CRDS = 3, 64 (15.7%) had CDRS = 4 and 22 (15.4%) had CDRS = 5. Apathy (85.7%), agitation or restlessness (75.1%) and paranoia (59.4%) were the most common NPS. Higher CDRS scores were associated with several neuropsychiatric features, including apathy, wandering and physical aggression. In the sex-stratified analysis, NPS were associated with more severe AD only in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest relevant sex differences in NPS with increasing severity.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A timely and targeted behavioral management could improve treatment outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2518093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2025.2518093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是在一个大型AD患者队列中研究NPS严重程度的可能性别预测因素,并评估严重程度在NPS性别相关差异中的作用。方法:根据NINCDS/ADRDA诊断标准,纳入424例AD患者(295名女性,平均年龄78.4±8.3岁,平均病程7.4±8.5年)。临床资料和NPS的存在收集自家庭访谈、医疗记录、患者访谈和检查。使用临床痴呆评定量表(CDRS)扩展版评估痴呆严重程度。结果:407名受试者获得CDRS评分(平均评分2.6±1.1);CRDS = 1的407例(22.1%),CRDS = 2的104例(25.5%),CRDS = 3的127例(31.2%),CDRS = 4的64例(15.7%),CDRS = 5的22例(15.4%)。冷漠(85.7%)、躁动或不安(75.1%)和偏执(59.4%)是最常见的NPS。较高的CDRS分数与一些神经精神特征有关,包括冷漠、徘徊和身体攻击。在性别分层分析中,NPS仅在男性中与更严重的AD相关。结论:我们的研究结果表明,NPS的性别差异与严重程度的增加有关。临床意义:及时、有针对性的行为管理可以改善治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms and Alzheimer's Disease Severity. A Focus on Sex-Differences.

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate possible sex predictors in the severity of NPS in a large cohort of patients with AD and to assess the role of severity in sex-related differences in NPS.

Methods: Four hundred and twenty-four participants (295 women, mean age 78.4 ± 8.3 years, mean disease duration 7.4 ± 8.5 years) were included with a diagnosis of AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria. Clinical data and presence of NPS were collected from family interview, medical records, and patient interview and examination. Dementia severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDRS) extended version.

Results: CDRS score was available for 407 participants (mean score 2.6 ± 1.1); 407 (22.1%) patients had CRDS = 1, 104 (25.5%) had CRDS = 2, 127 (31.2%) had CRDS = 3, 64 (15.7%) had CDRS = 4 and 22 (15.4%) had CDRS = 5. Apathy (85.7%), agitation or restlessness (75.1%) and paranoia (59.4%) were the most common NPS. Higher CDRS scores were associated with several neuropsychiatric features, including apathy, wandering and physical aggression. In the sex-stratified analysis, NPS were associated with more severe AD only in men.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest relevant sex differences in NPS with increasing severity.

Clinical implications: A timely and targeted behavioral management could improve treatment outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信