{"title":"血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对定期透析保留射血分数的急性冠脉综合征患者预后的影响","authors":"Yike Li, Enmin Xie, Qiang Chen, Yanxiang Gao, Zhen Meng, Changan Yu, Yaliu Yang, Zhaoxue Sheng, Conghan Fu, Limei Du, Wenyue Pang, Mulei Chen, Jingang Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Regular Dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yike Li, Enmin Xie, Qiang Chen, Yanxiang Gao, Zhen Meng, Changan Yu, Yaliu Yang, Zhaoxue Sheng, Conghan Fu, Limei Du, Wenyue Pang, Mulei Chen, Jingang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Regular Dialysis.
Purpose: The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.
Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.
Results: The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).
Conclusion: In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.
期刊介绍:
Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field.
Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients.
Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.