血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对定期透析保留射血分数的急性冠脉综合征患者预后的影响

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yike Li, Enmin Xie, Qiang Chen, Yanxiang Gao, Zhen Meng, Changan Yu, Yaliu Yang, Zhaoxue Sheng, Conghan Fu, Limei Du, Wenyue Pang, Mulei Chen, Jingang Zheng
{"title":"血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂对定期透析保留射血分数的急性冠脉综合征患者预后的影响","authors":"Yike Li, Enmin Xie, Qiang Chen, Yanxiang Gao, Zhen Meng, Changan Yu, Yaliu Yang, Zhaoxue Sheng, Conghan Fu, Limei Du, Wenyue Pang, Mulei Chen, Jingang Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Regular Dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yike Li, Enmin Xie, Qiang Chen, Yanxiang Gao, Zhen Meng, Changan Yu, Yaliu Yang, Zhaoxue Sheng, Conghan Fu, Limei Du, Wenyue Pang, Mulei Chen, Jingang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在溶栓时代进行的试验中,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)在心肌梗死(MI)后的应用得到了证实。然而,有限的证据表明ACEI/ARB对保留左室射血分数(LVEF)的患者有益。值得注意的是,这些研究通常排除了定期透析的患者。在这项研究中,我们研究了定期透析并保留左心室功能的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者使用ACEI/ARB与5年预后之间的关系。方法:本多中心回顾性研究纳入1249例诊断为冠心病(CAD)的透析患者。共分析603例符合纳入和排除标准的患者。结果:队列平均年龄61.7岁,男性占70.6%;313例(51.9%)患者接受了ACEI/ARB治疗。在5年的随访期间,使用ACEI/ARB对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的综合结局没有益处(31.3%对29.0%,p = 0.988)。然而,ACEI/ARBs降低了所有原因的死亡率(24.9%对33.1%,p = 0.012)和心血管死亡(14.7%对21.4%,p = 0.015)。此外,ACEI/ARB在左心室功能较差(LVEF 50-60%)的患者中显示出更明显的心血管死亡率降低。结论:ACEI/ARB可降低ACS患者的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。此外,在LVEF受损患者中观察到更明显的生存获益(50-60%)。然而,在MACE方面没有发现任何益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers on Prognosis in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Undergoing Regular Dialysis.

Purpose: The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).

Conclusion: In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field. Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients. Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信