Tong Wu, Laura D Klein, Scott Markham, Richard Brown, Christine Sulfaro, Vanessa Clifford
{"title":"在巴氏灭菌的供体母乳中,能形成孢子的专性厌氧菌是罕见的:一项初步研究。","authors":"Tong Wu, Laura D Klein, Scott Markham, Richard Brown, Christine Sulfaro, Vanessa Clifford","doi":"10.1089/bfm.2025.0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> When access to mother's own milk is limited, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) is the best alternative source of nutrition for high-risk preterm infants. Microbial screening of PDHM is essential to ensure its safety, as spore-forming bacteria may survive pasteurization. Standard screening will detect spore-forming bacteria that grow aerobically, such as <i>Bacillus cereus,</i> but may miss obligate anaerobes, such as <i>Clostridium</i> species. Although milk banking guidelines globally recommend microbial screening of milk batches, they do not specifically recommend anaerobic testing. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PDHM batches containing viable anaerobic bacteria after pasteurization. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In this prospective cohort study, 150 batches of PDHM from unique donors were sampled (August-December 2024) at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood and tested at an accredited food safety laboratory. Prepasteurization samples were tested for aerobic bacteria, and postpasteurization samples were tested for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using a validated method (detection limit ≤1 CFU/mL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> No bacteria were recovered from any of the 150 postpasteurization samples tested using an anaerobic culture method. Using standard aerobic culture, 4.7% (7/150) of samples failed prepasteurization microbial screening according to local acceptance guidelines, due to a total colony count ≥ 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 6) and/or the presence of Enterobacteriaceae ≥ 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 3), and none failed postpasteurization testing. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study confirmed that obligate anaerobic bacteria are rarely cultured from PDHM. Additional process control through routine testing for anaerobes in PDHM is therefore not considered essential, particularly when PDHM is stored frozen (<18°C) after pasteurization. Clinicians should maintain vigilance for potential recipient adverse events and promptly report these to the source milk bank.</p>","PeriodicalId":9142,"journal":{"name":"Breastfeeding Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viable Spore-Forming Obligate Anaerobes Are Rare in Pasteurized Donor Human Milk: A Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Tong Wu, Laura D Klein, Scott Markham, Richard Brown, Christine Sulfaro, Vanessa Clifford\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bfm.2025.0062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> When access to mother's own milk is limited, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) is the best alternative source of nutrition for high-risk preterm infants. Microbial screening of PDHM is essential to ensure its safety, as spore-forming bacteria may survive pasteurization. Standard screening will detect spore-forming bacteria that grow aerobically, such as <i>Bacillus cereus,</i> but may miss obligate anaerobes, such as <i>Clostridium</i> species. Although milk banking guidelines globally recommend microbial screening of milk batches, they do not specifically recommend anaerobic testing. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PDHM batches containing viable anaerobic bacteria after pasteurization. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In this prospective cohort study, 150 batches of PDHM from unique donors were sampled (August-December 2024) at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood and tested at an accredited food safety laboratory. Prepasteurization samples were tested for aerobic bacteria, and postpasteurization samples were tested for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using a validated method (detection limit ≤1 CFU/mL). <b><i>Results:</i></b> No bacteria were recovered from any of the 150 postpasteurization samples tested using an anaerobic culture method. Using standard aerobic culture, 4.7% (7/150) of samples failed prepasteurization microbial screening according to local acceptance guidelines, due to a total colony count ≥ 10<sup>5</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 6) and/or the presence of Enterobacteriaceae ≥ 10<sup>4</sup> CFU/mL (<i>n</i> = 3), and none failed postpasteurization testing. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This study confirmed that obligate anaerobic bacteria are rarely cultured from PDHM. Additional process control through routine testing for anaerobes in PDHM is therefore not considered essential, particularly when PDHM is stored frozen (<18°C) after pasteurization. Clinicians should maintain vigilance for potential recipient adverse events and promptly report these to the source milk bank.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breastfeeding Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2025.0062\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breastfeeding Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2025.0062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Viable Spore-Forming Obligate Anaerobes Are Rare in Pasteurized Donor Human Milk: A Pilot Study.
Background: When access to mother's own milk is limited, pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) is the best alternative source of nutrition for high-risk preterm infants. Microbial screening of PDHM is essential to ensure its safety, as spore-forming bacteria may survive pasteurization. Standard screening will detect spore-forming bacteria that grow aerobically, such as Bacillus cereus, but may miss obligate anaerobes, such as Clostridium species. Although milk banking guidelines globally recommend microbial screening of milk batches, they do not specifically recommend anaerobic testing. This study aimed to determine the proportion of PDHM batches containing viable anaerobic bacteria after pasteurization. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 150 batches of PDHM from unique donors were sampled (August-December 2024) at Australian Red Cross Lifeblood and tested at an accredited food safety laboratory. Prepasteurization samples were tested for aerobic bacteria, and postpasteurization samples were tested for both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria using a validated method (detection limit ≤1 CFU/mL). Results: No bacteria were recovered from any of the 150 postpasteurization samples tested using an anaerobic culture method. Using standard aerobic culture, 4.7% (7/150) of samples failed prepasteurization microbial screening according to local acceptance guidelines, due to a total colony count ≥ 105 CFU/mL (n = 6) and/or the presence of Enterobacteriaceae ≥ 104 CFU/mL (n = 3), and none failed postpasteurization testing. Conclusions: This study confirmed that obligate anaerobic bacteria are rarely cultured from PDHM. Additional process control through routine testing for anaerobes in PDHM is therefore not considered essential, particularly when PDHM is stored frozen (<18°C) after pasteurization. Clinicians should maintain vigilance for potential recipient adverse events and promptly report these to the source milk bank.
期刊介绍:
Breastfeeding Medicine provides unparalleled peer-reviewed research, protocols, and clinical applications to ensure optimal care for mother and infant. The Journal answers the growing demand for evidence-based research and explores the immediate and long-term outcomes of breastfeeding, including its epidemiologic, physiologic, and psychological benefits. It is the exclusive source of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine protocols.
Breastfeeding Medicine coverage includes:
Breastfeeding recommendations and protocols
Health consequences of artificial feeding
Physiology of lactation and biochemistry of breast milk
Optimal nutrition for the breastfeeding mother
Breastfeeding indications and contraindications
Managing breastfeeding discomfort, pain, and other complications
Breastfeeding the premature or sick infant
Breastfeeding in the chronically ill mother
Management of the breastfeeding mother on medication
Infectious disease transmission through breast milk and breastfeeding
The collection and storage of human milk and human milk banking
Measuring the impact of being a “baby-friendly” hospital
Cultural competence and cultural sensitivity
International public health issues including social and economic issues.