氟化二胺银和纳米银对早期儿童龋齿唾液细菌计数的影响:一项随机对照临床试验

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nour Ammar, Magda M El-Tekeya, Dalia M Talat, Sara Essa, Marwa M Essawy, Jan Kühnisch, Hams Hamed, Nouran Nabil, Samar El Achy, Maha El Tantawi
{"title":"氟化二胺银和纳米银对早期儿童龋齿唾液细菌计数的影响:一项随机对照临床试验","authors":"Nour Ammar, Magda M El-Tekeya, Dalia M Talat, Sara Essa, Marwa M Essawy, Jan Kühnisch, Hams Hamed, Nouran Nabil, Samar El Achy, Maha El Tantawi","doi":"10.1186/s12903-025-06325-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is indicated for the management of early childhood caries (ECC). Similarly, nanosilver fluoride (NSF) is effective against caries. However, there are limited comparisons between both agents, especially regarding their antibacterial effect. This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of SDF and NSF on salivary bacterial counts in children with ECC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty 4-6-year-olds presenting with active dentin caries (ICDAS code 5) in primary teeth were randomly allocated to two groups. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli in unstimulated saliva were cultivated on differential media and counted as colony-forming units. Followed by the application of either 38% SDF or NSF. Saliva samples were recollected after one month. The legal guardians completed a detailed questionnaire assessing their child's dental hygiene habits, dental pain experience, and socioeconomic background. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the effects of both agents on bacterial counts while accounting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 4.8 ± 0.8 years, with the majority (96%, N = 48) presenting with severe ECC. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, dmft score, socioeconomic background, dental hygiene habits, or dental experience. After one month, within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in S. mutans only in the NSF group (p = 0.002) and significant decreases in Lactobacilli counts in both SDF and NSF groups (p < 0.05). However, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in the reduction of S. mutans (1.4% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.192) or Lactobacilli counts (6.0% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.754). Regression analyses revealed non-significant odds of reduced bacterial counts after NSF application compared to SDF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After one application, children with ECC showed significant decrease in salivary bacteria, with no difference between the two agents regarding their antibacterial effect. NSF can serve as a viable option in ECC management in that it provides comparable antibacterial effects to 38% SDF without inducing tooth discoloration. This trial was prospectively registered on the clinicaltrials.gov registry with ID: NCT05221749 on 03/02/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"25 1","pages":"945"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150551/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of silver diamine fluoride and nanosilver on salivary bacterial counts in children with early childhood caries: a randomized controlled clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Nour Ammar, Magda M El-Tekeya, Dalia M Talat, Sara Essa, Marwa M Essawy, Jan Kühnisch, Hams Hamed, Nouran Nabil, Samar El Achy, Maha El Tantawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12903-025-06325-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is indicated for the management of early childhood caries (ECC). Similarly, nanosilver fluoride (NSF) is effective against caries. However, there are limited comparisons between both agents, especially regarding their antibacterial effect. This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of SDF and NSF on salivary bacterial counts in children with ECC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty 4-6-year-olds presenting with active dentin caries (ICDAS code 5) in primary teeth were randomly allocated to two groups. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli in unstimulated saliva were cultivated on differential media and counted as colony-forming units. Followed by the application of either 38% SDF or NSF. Saliva samples were recollected after one month. The legal guardians completed a detailed questionnaire assessing their child's dental hygiene habits, dental pain experience, and socioeconomic background. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the effects of both agents on bacterial counts while accounting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of participants was 4.8 ± 0.8 years, with the majority (96%, N = 48) presenting with severe ECC. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, dmft score, socioeconomic background, dental hygiene habits, or dental experience. After one month, within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in S. mutans only in the NSF group (p = 0.002) and significant decreases in Lactobacilli counts in both SDF and NSF groups (p < 0.05). However, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in the reduction of S. mutans (1.4% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.192) or Lactobacilli counts (6.0% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.754). Regression analyses revealed non-significant odds of reduced bacterial counts after NSF application compared to SDF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After one application, children with ECC showed significant decrease in salivary bacteria, with no difference between the two agents regarding their antibacterial effect. NSF can serve as a viable option in ECC management in that it provides comparable antibacterial effects to 38% SDF without inducing tooth discoloration. This trial was prospectively registered on the clinicaltrials.gov registry with ID: NCT05221749 on 03/02/2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"945\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12150551/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Oral Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06325-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-025-06325-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:氟化二胺银(SDF)用于治疗儿童早期龋齿(ECC)。同样,纳米氟化银(NSF)对龋齿也很有效。然而,两种药物之间的比较有限,特别是在抗菌效果方面。本随机对照临床试验旨在比较SDF和NSF对ECC患儿唾液细菌计数的影响。方法:将50例4 ~ 6岁表现为乳牙活动性牙本质龋(ICDAS代码5)的儿童随机分为两组。在未受刺激的唾液中培养变形链球菌(S. mutans)和乳酸杆菌,并以集落形成单位计数。其次是38% SDF或NSF的应用。一个月后收集唾液样本。法定监护人完成了一份详细的调查问卷,评估他们孩子的牙齿卫生习惯、牙齿疼痛经历和社会经济背景。在考虑混杂因素的情况下,采用多变量二元逻辑回归来评估两种药物对细菌计数的影响。结果:参与者的平均年龄为4.8±0.8岁,大多数(96%,N = 48)表现为严重的ECC。两组在年龄、性别、dmft评分、社会经济背景、口腔卫生习惯或牙科经验方面没有统计学上的显著差异。1个月后,组内分析显示,只有NSF组的变形链球菌数量显著减少(p = 0.002), SDF组和NSF组的乳酸杆菌数量均显著减少(p结论:一次应用后,ECC患儿唾液细菌数量显著减少,两种药物的抗菌效果无差异。NSF可以作为ECC管理的可行选择,因为它具有与38% SDF相当的抗菌效果,而不会引起牙齿变色。该试验已于2022年3月2日在clinicaltrials.gov注册中心前瞻性注册,ID: NCT05221749。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of silver diamine fluoride and nanosilver on salivary bacterial counts in children with early childhood caries: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Background: Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) is indicated for the management of early childhood caries (ECC). Similarly, nanosilver fluoride (NSF) is effective against caries. However, there are limited comparisons between both agents, especially regarding their antibacterial effect. This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare the effects of SDF and NSF on salivary bacterial counts in children with ECC.

Methods: Fifty 4-6-year-olds presenting with active dentin caries (ICDAS code 5) in primary teeth were randomly allocated to two groups. Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacilli in unstimulated saliva were cultivated on differential media and counted as colony-forming units. Followed by the application of either 38% SDF or NSF. Saliva samples were recollected after one month. The legal guardians completed a detailed questionnaire assessing their child's dental hygiene habits, dental pain experience, and socioeconomic background. Multivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the effects of both agents on bacterial counts while accounting for confounders.

Results: The mean age of participants was 4.8 ± 0.8 years, with the majority (96%, N = 48) presenting with severe ECC. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, sex, dmft score, socioeconomic background, dental hygiene habits, or dental experience. After one month, within-group analysis showed a significant reduction in S. mutans only in the NSF group (p = 0.002) and significant decreases in Lactobacilli counts in both SDF and NSF groups (p < 0.05). However, between-group comparisons revealed no significant differences in the reduction of S. mutans (1.4% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.192) or Lactobacilli counts (6.0% and 6.0%, respectively, p = 0.754). Regression analyses revealed non-significant odds of reduced bacterial counts after NSF application compared to SDF.

Conclusion: After one application, children with ECC showed significant decrease in salivary bacteria, with no difference between the two agents regarding their antibacterial effect. NSF can serve as a viable option in ECC management in that it provides comparable antibacterial effects to 38% SDF without inducing tooth discoloration. This trial was prospectively registered on the clinicaltrials.gov registry with ID: NCT05221749 on 03/02/2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信