镇静和手术后外显回忆的心理影响(PEERS): 2500例患者的前瞻性队列研究。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005603
Jason Chui, Luis E Mendoza Vasquez, Courtney Fleming, Arjun Patel, Zahra Taboun, Madeline Green-Holland, LeeAnne Fochesato, Douglas Naudie, Homer Yang, John M Murkin
{"title":"镇静和手术后外显回忆的心理影响(PEERS): 2500例患者的前瞻性队列研究。","authors":"Jason Chui, Luis E Mendoza Vasquez, Courtney Fleming, Arjun Patel, Zahra Taboun, Madeline Green-Holland, LeeAnne Fochesato, Douglas Naudie, Homer Yang, John M Murkin","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Explicit recall occurring during sedation/regional anesthesia is common but has long been assumed to have no sequelae. A prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of explicit recall experience under sedation/regional anesthesia, as well as to assess the recall experiences that are associated with psychological consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study prospectively recruited 2,500 adults who underwent elective total hip or knee arthroplasty under sedation/regional anesthesia from September 2021 to March 2024 at University Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was recall experience, assessed using the modified Brice questionnaire. The co-primary outcomes included probable depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire score of 8 or higher) and suspected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (defined as a Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Civilians score of 13 or higher) at 6 weeks postoperatively. The association between specific recall experiences and the co-primary outcomes was evaluated by multivariable regression analysis. Additionally, the incidence and mental health burden related to the psychological effects of surgery in the entire cohort were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,138 patients were included in the final analysis. Explicit recall was reported by 475 participants (22.2%) but was not associated with the co-primary outcomes. Regarding surgery's overall impact, 61 participants (5%) developed new probable depression, 105 participants (5%) reported suspected PTSD, and 95 patients (4.4%) developed new suicidal ideation postoperatively. The authors estimated that 1 in 18 patients required new psychiatric consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Explicit recall per se during sedation/regional anesthesia did not increase the odds of developing psychiatric illness. Surgery itself carries significant risks of triggering depression and PTSD that are severe enough to reach levels associated with suicidal ideation, requiring immediate mental care. This study reveals a significant, yet underappreciated, mental healthcare burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"570-581"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Effects of Explicit Recall under Sedation and after Surgery (PEERS): A Prospective Cohort Study on 2,500 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Chui, Luis E Mendoza Vasquez, Courtney Fleming, Arjun Patel, Zahra Taboun, Madeline Green-Holland, LeeAnne Fochesato, Douglas Naudie, Homer Yang, John M Murkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005603\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Explicit recall occurring during sedation/regional anesthesia is common but has long been assumed to have no sequelae. A prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of explicit recall experience under sedation/regional anesthesia, as well as to assess the recall experiences that are associated with psychological consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study prospectively recruited 2,500 adults who underwent elective total hip or knee arthroplasty under sedation/regional anesthesia from September 2021 to March 2024 at University Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was recall experience, assessed using the modified Brice questionnaire. The co-primary outcomes included probable depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire score of 8 or higher) and suspected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (defined as a Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Civilians score of 13 or higher) at 6 weeks postoperatively. The association between specific recall experiences and the co-primary outcomes was evaluated by multivariable regression analysis. Additionally, the incidence and mental health burden related to the psychological effects of surgery in the entire cohort were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,138 patients were included in the final analysis. Explicit recall was reported by 475 participants (22.2%) but was not associated with the co-primary outcomes. Regarding surgery's overall impact, 61 participants (5%) developed new probable depression, 105 participants (5%) reported suspected PTSD, and 95 patients (4.4%) developed new suicidal ideation postoperatively. The authors estimated that 1 in 18 patients required new psychiatric consultation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Explicit recall per se during sedation/regional anesthesia did not increase the odds of developing psychiatric illness. Surgery itself carries significant risks of triggering depression and PTSD that are severe enough to reach levels associated with suicidal ideation, requiring immediate mental care. This study reveals a significant, yet underappreciated, mental healthcare burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"570-581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005603\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005603","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在镇静/区域麻醉期间发生的明确回忆是常见的,但长期以来被认为没有后遗症。我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以确定镇静/区域麻醉下外显回忆体验的发生率,以及评估与心理后果相关的回忆体验。方法:我们前瞻性地招募了2500名于2021年9月至2024年3月在加拿大伦敦大学医院接受镇静/区域麻醉的选择性全髋关节或膝关节置换术的成年人。主要暴露是回忆经验,使用改进的Brice问卷进行评估。共同主要结局包括术后6周可能出现的抑郁症(定义为患者健康问卷得分≥8)和疑似创伤后应激障碍症状(定义为创伤后应激障碍检查表-平民≥13)。通过多变量回归分析评估特定回忆经历与共同主要结局之间的关系。此外,我们评估了整个队列中与手术心理影响相关的发病率和心理健康负担。结果:最终分析共纳入2138例患者。475名参与者(22.2%)报告了外显回忆,但与共同主要结果无关。关于手术的总体影响,61名参与者(5%)出现新的可能的抑郁症,105名参与者(5%)报告疑似创伤后应激障碍,95名患者(4.4%)术后出现新的自杀意念。我们估计每18个病人中就有1个需要新的精神病学咨询。结论:在镇静/区域麻醉期间,外显回忆本身不会增加精神疾病发生的几率。手术本身就有引发抑郁症和创伤后应激障碍的重大风险,其严重程度足以达到与自杀意念相关的水平,需要立即进行精神护理。这项研究揭示了一个重要的,但未被重视的心理健康负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological Effects of Explicit Recall under Sedation and after Surgery (PEERS): A Prospective Cohort Study on 2,500 Patients.

Background: Explicit recall occurring during sedation/regional anesthesia is common but has long been assumed to have no sequelae. A prospective cohort study was conducted to determine the incidence of explicit recall experience under sedation/regional anesthesia, as well as to assess the recall experiences that are associated with psychological consequences.

Methods: The study prospectively recruited 2,500 adults who underwent elective total hip or knee arthroplasty under sedation/regional anesthesia from September 2021 to March 2024 at University Hospital in London, Ontario, Canada. The primary exposure was recall experience, assessed using the modified Brice questionnaire. The co-primary outcomes included probable depression (defined as a Patient Health Questionnaire score of 8 or higher) and suspected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (defined as a Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for Civilians score of 13 or higher) at 6 weeks postoperatively. The association between specific recall experiences and the co-primary outcomes was evaluated by multivariable regression analysis. Additionally, the incidence and mental health burden related to the psychological effects of surgery in the entire cohort were assessed.

Results: A total of 2,138 patients were included in the final analysis. Explicit recall was reported by 475 participants (22.2%) but was not associated with the co-primary outcomes. Regarding surgery's overall impact, 61 participants (5%) developed new probable depression, 105 participants (5%) reported suspected PTSD, and 95 patients (4.4%) developed new suicidal ideation postoperatively. The authors estimated that 1 in 18 patients required new psychiatric consultation.

Conclusions: Explicit recall per se during sedation/regional anesthesia did not increase the odds of developing psychiatric illness. Surgery itself carries significant risks of triggering depression and PTSD that are severe enough to reach levels associated with suicidal ideation, requiring immediate mental care. This study reveals a significant, yet underappreciated, mental healthcare burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信