全髋关节置换术中保留运动的筋膜平面阻滞与关节周围局部浸润镇痛的比较:网络荟萃分析。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1097/ALN.0000000000005607
Nasir Hussain, Richard Brull, Alex T Freedenberg, Chris Vannabouathong, Ryan S D'Souza, Steven Havlik, Peyton Beachy, Antonius Gunawan, Tristan E Weaver, Daniel I McIsaac, Colin J L McCartney, Faraj W Abdallah
{"title":"全髋关节置换术中保留运动的筋膜平面阻滞与关节周围局部浸润镇痛的比较:网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Nasir Hussain, Richard Brull, Alex T Freedenberg, Chris Vannabouathong, Ryan S D'Souza, Steven Havlik, Peyton Beachy, Antonius Gunawan, Tristan E Weaver, Daniel I McIsaac, Colin J L McCartney, Faraj W Abdallah","doi":"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periarticular local infiltration analgesia has become an important mainstay of multimodal analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the role of novel motor-sparing fascial plane blocks-with or without periarticular local infiltration analgesia-has not been fully elucidated for patients undergoing THA. The authors conducted a network meta-analysis evaluating the relative analgesic effectiveness of motor-sparing fascial plane blocks (quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and pericapsular nerve group blocks) and periarticular local infiltration analgesia for adult patients undergoing THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized trials examining single-injection quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, or pericapsular nerve group blocks, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia, for THA were sought. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) rest pain scores during the period from 0 to 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rest pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h; postoperative function at 6, 12, and 24 h; analgesic consumption at 0 to 24 h; incidence of opioid-related side effects; and incidence of block-related complications. Network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 trials (3,579 patients) evaluating the quadratus lumborum block, erector spinae block, pericapsular nerve group block, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia for THA were considered. Network meta-analysis was used to derive the probability of each intervention being the most effective as compared to the others (P score). For AUC 0 to 24 h rest pain, periarticular local infiltration analgesia was the most effective intervention, as demonstrated by a P score of 89%. For postoperative analgesic consumption, the quadratus lumborum block was the most effective intervention, with a P score of 88%. This was followed by the pericapsular nerve group block (74%), the erector spinae block (38%), and periarticular local infiltration analgesia (42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periarticular local infiltration analgesia alone provides the most consistent improvements in postoperative rest pain, analgesic consumption, and functional recovery after THA. The addition of a quadratus lumborum block or pericapsular nerve group block to periarticular local infiltration may further improve analgesic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":"604-624"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analgesic Benefits of Motor-sparing Fascial Plane Blocks in Comparison to Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nasir Hussain, Richard Brull, Alex T Freedenberg, Chris Vannabouathong, Ryan S D'Souza, Steven Havlik, Peyton Beachy, Antonius Gunawan, Tristan E Weaver, Daniel I McIsaac, Colin J L McCartney, Faraj W Abdallah\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ALN.0000000000005607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periarticular local infiltration analgesia has become an important mainstay of multimodal analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the role of novel motor-sparing fascial plane blocks-with or without periarticular local infiltration analgesia-has not been fully elucidated for patients undergoing THA. The authors conducted a network meta-analysis evaluating the relative analgesic effectiveness of motor-sparing fascial plane blocks (quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and pericapsular nerve group blocks) and periarticular local infiltration analgesia for adult patients undergoing THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Randomized trials examining single-injection quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, or pericapsular nerve group blocks, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia, for THA were sought. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) rest pain scores during the period from 0 to 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rest pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h; postoperative function at 6, 12, and 24 h; analgesic consumption at 0 to 24 h; incidence of opioid-related side effects; and incidence of block-related complications. Network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 44 trials (3,579 patients) evaluating the quadratus lumborum block, erector spinae block, pericapsular nerve group block, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia for THA were considered. Network meta-analysis was used to derive the probability of each intervention being the most effective as compared to the others (P score). For AUC 0 to 24 h rest pain, periarticular local infiltration analgesia was the most effective intervention, as demonstrated by a P score of 89%. For postoperative analgesic consumption, the quadratus lumborum block was the most effective intervention, with a P score of 88%. This was followed by the pericapsular nerve group block (74%), the erector spinae block (38%), and periarticular local infiltration analgesia (42%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periarticular local infiltration analgesia alone provides the most consistent improvements in postoperative rest pain, analgesic consumption, and functional recovery after THA. The addition of a quadratus lumborum block or pericapsular nerve group block to periarticular local infiltration may further improve analgesic outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"604-624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005607\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000005607","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关节周围局部浸润性镇痛已成为选择性全髋关节置换术(THA)后多模式镇痛的重要支柱。然而,新的保留运动的筋膜平面阻滞-有或没有关节周围局部浸润镇痛-对THA患者的作用尚未完全阐明。我们进行了一项网络meta分析,评估保留运动的筋膜平面阻滞(腰方肌、竖脊肌和囊包神经群阻滞)和关节周围局部浸润镇痛对THA成年患者的相对镇痛效果。方法:寻求随机试验,检查单次注射腰方肌,竖脊肌,或包膜神经群阻滞,或关节周围局部浸润镇痛,用于THA。主要观察指标为0-24小时的曲线下面积(AUC)休息疼痛评分。次要结局包括0、6、12和24小时的休息疼痛评分;术后6、12、24小时功能;0 ~ 24小时镇痛药用量;阿片类药物相关副作用发生率;以及阻滞相关并发症的发生率。网络荟萃分析采用频率分析方法。结果:44项试验(3,579例患者)评估了腰方肌阻滞、竖脊肌阻滞、囊周神经群阻滞或关节周围局部浸润性THA镇痛。网络荟萃分析用于得出与其他干预相比,每种干预最有效的概率(p得分)。对于AUC 0-24小时静息疼痛,p值为89%,关节周围局部浸润性镇痛是最有效的干预措施。对于术后镇痛消耗,腰方肌阻滞是最有效的干预措施,p值为88%,其次是囊周神经群阻滞(74%),直立棘阻滞(38%)和关节周围局部浸润性镇痛(42%)。结论:单纯关节周围局部浸润镇痛对THA术后静息痛、镇痛消耗和功能恢复的改善最为一致。腰方肌阻滞或囊周神经群阻滞可进一步改善关节周围局部浸润的镇痛效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analgesic Benefits of Motor-sparing Fascial Plane Blocks in Comparison to Periarticular Local Infiltration Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Network Meta-analysis.

Background: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia has become an important mainstay of multimodal analgesia after elective total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the role of novel motor-sparing fascial plane blocks-with or without periarticular local infiltration analgesia-has not been fully elucidated for patients undergoing THA. The authors conducted a network meta-analysis evaluating the relative analgesic effectiveness of motor-sparing fascial plane blocks (quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, and pericapsular nerve group blocks) and periarticular local infiltration analgesia for adult patients undergoing THA.

Methods: Randomized trials examining single-injection quadratus lumborum, erector spinae, or pericapsular nerve group blocks, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia, for THA were sought. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) rest pain scores during the period from 0 to 24 h. Secondary outcomes included rest pain scores at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h; postoperative function at 6, 12, and 24 h; analgesic consumption at 0 to 24 h; incidence of opioid-related side effects; and incidence of block-related complications. Network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach.

Results: A total of 44 trials (3,579 patients) evaluating the quadratus lumborum block, erector spinae block, pericapsular nerve group block, or periarticular local infiltration analgesia for THA were considered. Network meta-analysis was used to derive the probability of each intervention being the most effective as compared to the others (P score). For AUC 0 to 24 h rest pain, periarticular local infiltration analgesia was the most effective intervention, as demonstrated by a P score of 89%. For postoperative analgesic consumption, the quadratus lumborum block was the most effective intervention, with a P score of 88%. This was followed by the pericapsular nerve group block (74%), the erector spinae block (38%), and periarticular local infiltration analgesia (42%).

Conclusions: Periarticular local infiltration analgesia alone provides the most consistent improvements in postoperative rest pain, analgesic consumption, and functional recovery after THA. The addition of a quadratus lumborum block or pericapsular nerve group block to periarticular local infiltration may further improve analgesic outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesiology
Anesthesiology 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
542
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信