材料挤压3D打印PLA牙科模型的潜力:一项研究机械性能和尺寸精度的体外研究。

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jiandong Li, Yuyang Mao, Jamila Yassine, Nico Henning, Alexey Unkovskiy, Florian Beuer, Franziska Schmidt
{"title":"材料挤压3D打印PLA牙科模型的潜力:一项研究机械性能和尺寸精度的体外研究。","authors":"Jiandong Li, Yuyang Mao, Jamila Yassine, Nico Henning, Alexey Unkovskiy, Florian Beuer, Franziska Schmidt","doi":"10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing in dentistry has prompted comparisons between the mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) samples fabricated using material extrusion (MEx) and resin samples produced using digital light processing (DLP). This study aims to assess the potential of replacing resin-based models with PLA models in clinical settings by evaluating the mechanical properties and accuracy of MEx-printed PLA and DLP-printed resin samples. The investigated materials include pure PLA, a PLA composite containing gypsum, and a clinically approved resin material. Strength and hardness tests were conducted using custom-made samples measuring 16 × 4 × 2 mm<sup>3</sup>. Additionally, oral cavity scans were used to generate oral models for each material to assess their accuracy, trueness, and precision. The results indicated that pure PLA exhibited the highest flexural modulus (2055 ± 217.70 MPa) and compression modulus (2.40 ± 0.14 GPa). The PLA-Gypsum composite displayed the highest hardness (19.48 ± 2.12 HV1). As for the trueness of the oral models, there were no statistically significant differences between the models made from the three materials. However, the PLA-Gypsum composite demonstrated the best precision (23.84 ± 4.12 μm). These findings suggest that both PLA materials have significant potential to replace DLP-produced resin models in the clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The potential of PLA based dental models by material extrusion 3D printing: an in vitro study investigating mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Jiandong Li, Yuyang Mao, Jamila Yassine, Nico Henning, Alexey Unkovskiy, Florian Beuer, Franziska Schmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing in dentistry has prompted comparisons between the mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) samples fabricated using material extrusion (MEx) and resin samples produced using digital light processing (DLP). This study aims to assess the potential of replacing resin-based models with PLA models in clinical settings by evaluating the mechanical properties and accuracy of MEx-printed PLA and DLP-printed resin samples. The investigated materials include pure PLA, a PLA composite containing gypsum, and a clinically approved resin material. Strength and hardness tests were conducted using custom-made samples measuring 16 × 4 × 2 mm<sup>3</sup>. Additionally, oral cavity scans were used to generate oral models for each material to assess their accuracy, trueness, and precision. The results indicated that pure PLA exhibited the highest flexural modulus (2055 ± 217.70 MPa) and compression modulus (2.40 ± 0.14 GPa). The PLA-Gypsum composite displayed the highest hardness (19.48 ± 2.12 HV1). As for the trueness of the oral models, there were no statistically significant differences between the models made from the three materials. However, the PLA-Gypsum composite demonstrated the best precision (23.84 ± 4.12 μm). These findings suggest that both PLA materials have significant potential to replace DLP-produced resin models in the clinical applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"50\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152067/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-025-06899-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

三维(3D)打印在牙科领域的快速发展促使人们对使用材料挤压(MEx)制造的聚乳酸(PLA)样品和使用数字光处理(DLP)生产的树脂样品的机械性能进行比较。本研究旨在通过评估x- x打印PLA和dlp打印树脂样品的力学性能和准确性,评估PLA模型在临床环境中取代树脂模型的潜力。所研究的材料包括纯聚乳酸、含石膏的聚乳酸复合材料和临床批准的树脂材料。强度和硬度测试采用定制样品,尺寸为16 × 4 × 2 mm3。此外,口腔扫描用于生成每种材料的口腔模型,以评估其准确性,真实性和精度。结果表明,纯PLA具有最高的弯曲模量(2055±217.70 MPa)和压缩模量(2.40±0.14 GPa)。pla -石膏复合材料的硬度最高(19.48±2.12 HV1)。三种材料制作的口腔模型的真实度差异无统计学意义。pla -石膏复合材料的测量精度最高(23.84±4.12 μm)。这些发现表明,这两种PLA材料在临床应用中具有取代dlp生产的树脂模型的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The potential of PLA based dental models by material extrusion 3D printing: an in vitro study investigating mechanical properties and dimensional accuracy.

The rapid advancement of three-dimensional (3D) printing in dentistry has prompted comparisons between the mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) samples fabricated using material extrusion (MEx) and resin samples produced using digital light processing (DLP). This study aims to assess the potential of replacing resin-based models with PLA models in clinical settings by evaluating the mechanical properties and accuracy of MEx-printed PLA and DLP-printed resin samples. The investigated materials include pure PLA, a PLA composite containing gypsum, and a clinically approved resin material. Strength and hardness tests were conducted using custom-made samples measuring 16 × 4 × 2 mm3. Additionally, oral cavity scans were used to generate oral models for each material to assess their accuracy, trueness, and precision. The results indicated that pure PLA exhibited the highest flexural modulus (2055 ± 217.70 MPa) and compression modulus (2.40 ± 0.14 GPa). The PLA-Gypsum composite displayed the highest hardness (19.48 ± 2.12 HV1). As for the trueness of the oral models, there were no statistically significant differences between the models made from the three materials. However, the PLA-Gypsum composite demonstrated the best precision (23.84 ± 4.12 μm). These findings suggest that both PLA materials have significant potential to replace DLP-produced resin models in the clinical applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine publishes refereed papers providing significant progress in the application of biomaterials and tissue engineering constructs as medical or dental implants, prostheses and devices. Coverage spans a wide range of topics from basic science to clinical applications, around the theme of materials in medicine and dentistry. The central element is the development of synthetic and natural materials used in orthopaedic, maxillofacial, cardiovascular, neurological, ophthalmic and dental applications. Special biomedical topics include biomaterial synthesis and characterisation, biocompatibility studies, nanomedicine, tissue engineering constructs and cell substrates, regenerative medicine, computer modelling and other advanced experimental methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信