女性在大学中的代表性不足:在女性学者的卧室里寻找答案

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
María José Rodríguez-Jaume, María Concepción Torres Díaz, Carmen Carretón-Ballester, Diana Gil-González
{"title":"女性在大学中的代表性不足:在女性学者的卧室里寻找答案","authors":"María José Rodríguez-Jaume,&nbsp;María Concepción Torres Díaz,&nbsp;Carmen Carretón-Ballester,&nbsp;Diana Gil-González","doi":"10.1111/gwao.13241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Three decades after the implementation of gender equality policies in Europe, women academics continue to languish in the <i>ivory basements</i> of higher education centers. A growing body of literature on the participation of women academics in universities has identified reproductive work as a factor that may explain their low levels of representation. Recent research on the effects of COVID-19 on academic work has shed light on the impact of this “private matter” on the lives and academic careers of women and on the scientific system. The central role of reproductive work, in which it is assumed that women and men participate unequally in the care and attention to children, excludes other “private matters” that may help explain the underrepresentation of women in higher education institutions. Here, through the narrative reflection of a female academic who, for over a decade, held a high position at her university, we share the “private matter” that ultimately led to her divorce. By introducing women's voices into the debate on their underrepresentation in universities, we provide a way to recognize ways in which culture “does gender” and to raise awareness about forms of gender that, although silenced, shape our lives (<i>gender in disguise</i>). This autobiographical story identifies four themes that challenge power structures through recognizing silenced stories and promoting honest discussion about the true barriers and failures that persist in universities: the maternal ideal, the retraditionalization of gender, postfeminist “we can have it all” rhetoric, and the shame and fear faced by female academics.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48128,"journal":{"name":"Gender Work and Organization","volume":"32 4","pages":"1499-1510"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underrepresentation of Women in Universities: Seeking Answers in the Bedrooms of Women Academics\",\"authors\":\"María José Rodríguez-Jaume,&nbsp;María Concepción Torres Díaz,&nbsp;Carmen Carretón-Ballester,&nbsp;Diana Gil-González\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gwao.13241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Three decades after the implementation of gender equality policies in Europe, women academics continue to languish in the <i>ivory basements</i> of higher education centers. A growing body of literature on the participation of women academics in universities has identified reproductive work as a factor that may explain their low levels of representation. Recent research on the effects of COVID-19 on academic work has shed light on the impact of this “private matter” on the lives and academic careers of women and on the scientific system. The central role of reproductive work, in which it is assumed that women and men participate unequally in the care and attention to children, excludes other “private matters” that may help explain the underrepresentation of women in higher education institutions. Here, through the narrative reflection of a female academic who, for over a decade, held a high position at her university, we share the “private matter” that ultimately led to her divorce. By introducing women's voices into the debate on their underrepresentation in universities, we provide a way to recognize ways in which culture “does gender” and to raise awareness about forms of gender that, although silenced, shape our lives (<i>gender in disguise</i>). This autobiographical story identifies four themes that challenge power structures through recognizing silenced stories and promoting honest discussion about the true barriers and failures that persist in universities: the maternal ideal, the retraditionalization of gender, postfeminist “we can have it all” rhetoric, and the shame and fear faced by female academics.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"1499-1510\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Work and Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13241\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Work and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gwao.13241","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲实施性别平等政策三十年后,女性学者继续在高等教育中心的象牙地下室里苦苦挣扎。越来越多的关于大学女学者参与的文献指出,生殖工作可能是解释她们代表性低的一个因素。最近关于COVID-19对学术工作影响的研究揭示了这一“私事”对女性生活和学术事业以及科学体系的影响。生殖工作的中心作用假定妇女和男子不平等地参与照顾和照顾儿童,排除了可能有助于解释妇女在高等教育机构中人数不足的其他“私人事务”。在这里,我们通过一位女学者的叙事反思,她在大学里担任了十多年的高位,我们分享了最终导致她离婚的“私事”。通过将女性的声音引入到关于她们在大学中代表性不足的辩论中,我们提供了一种认识文化“决定性别”的方式,并提高对性别形式的认识,这些形式虽然被沉默,但却塑造了我们的生活(伪装的性别)。这个自传式的故事确定了四个主题,通过承认沉默的故事,促进对大学中持续存在的真正障碍和失败的诚实讨论,挑战权力结构:母性理想,性别的再传统化,后女权主义“我们可以拥有一切”的言论,以及女性学者面临的羞耻和恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Underrepresentation of Women in Universities: Seeking Answers in the Bedrooms of Women Academics

Three decades after the implementation of gender equality policies in Europe, women academics continue to languish in the ivory basements of higher education centers. A growing body of literature on the participation of women academics in universities has identified reproductive work as a factor that may explain their low levels of representation. Recent research on the effects of COVID-19 on academic work has shed light on the impact of this “private matter” on the lives and academic careers of women and on the scientific system. The central role of reproductive work, in which it is assumed that women and men participate unequally in the care and attention to children, excludes other “private matters” that may help explain the underrepresentation of women in higher education institutions. Here, through the narrative reflection of a female academic who, for over a decade, held a high position at her university, we share the “private matter” that ultimately led to her divorce. By introducing women's voices into the debate on their underrepresentation in universities, we provide a way to recognize ways in which culture “does gender” and to raise awareness about forms of gender that, although silenced, shape our lives (gender in disguise). This autobiographical story identifies four themes that challenge power structures through recognizing silenced stories and promoting honest discussion about the true barriers and failures that persist in universities: the maternal ideal, the retraditionalization of gender, postfeminist “we can have it all” rhetoric, and the shame and fear faced by female academics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Gender, Work & Organization is a bimonthly peer-reviewed academic journal. The journal was established in 1994 and is published by John Wiley & Sons. It covers research on the role of gender on the workfloor. In addition to the regular issues, the journal publishes several special issues per year and has new section, Feminist Frontiers,dedicated to contemporary conversations and topics in feminism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信