气候变化不确定性下生物多样性的稳健保护规划

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Alexis Rutschmann, Matthew P. Moskwik, Robert J. Lempert, Melissa S. Bukovsky, Seth McGinnis, Dan L. Warren, Linda O. Mearns, Camille Parmesan
{"title":"气候变化不确定性下生物多样性的稳健保护规划","authors":"Alexis Rutschmann,&nbsp;Matthew P. Moskwik,&nbsp;Robert J. Lempert,&nbsp;Melissa S. Bukovsky,&nbsp;Seth McGinnis,&nbsp;Dan L. Warren,&nbsp;Linda O. Mearns,&nbsp;Camille Parmesan","doi":"10.1111/gcb.70293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>When designing new protected areas, conservation managers often use bioclimatic models to anticipate the effects of climate change on species distributions. Recent studies have shown that the outputs of such models frequently differ in direction and magnitude, generating uncertainties that compromise their value for guiding conservation plans. Traditional approaches tend to minimise this uncertainty by designing adaptive strategies or by complexifying predictive models. However, these approaches may prove inadequate when uncertainty grows too large, as is the case with climate change. Here, rather than attempting to reduce uncertainty, we propose to embrace and value it in order to seek conservation measures that are as robust as possible to many plausible futures. By adapting this “Robust Decision Making” framework to conservation, we stress tested five generic conservation strategies against hundreds of plausible futures, for each of 22 species of concern. Our conceptual study seeks the strengths and vulnerabilities of each strategy across many possible future directions, facilitating both decision-making amongst strategies and emergence of robust and adaptive conservation plans. We anticipate our approach to offer an innovative framework to complement classic species conservation planning methods by reducing sensitivity to climate change uncertainty and improving the overall performance of conservation actions.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":175,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Conservation Planning for Biodiversity Under Climate Change Uncertainty\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Rutschmann,&nbsp;Matthew P. Moskwik,&nbsp;Robert J. Lempert,&nbsp;Melissa S. Bukovsky,&nbsp;Seth McGinnis,&nbsp;Dan L. Warren,&nbsp;Linda O. Mearns,&nbsp;Camille Parmesan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcb.70293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>When designing new protected areas, conservation managers often use bioclimatic models to anticipate the effects of climate change on species distributions. Recent studies have shown that the outputs of such models frequently differ in direction and magnitude, generating uncertainties that compromise their value for guiding conservation plans. Traditional approaches tend to minimise this uncertainty by designing adaptive strategies or by complexifying predictive models. However, these approaches may prove inadequate when uncertainty grows too large, as is the case with climate change. Here, rather than attempting to reduce uncertainty, we propose to embrace and value it in order to seek conservation measures that are as robust as possible to many plausible futures. By adapting this “Robust Decision Making” framework to conservation, we stress tested five generic conservation strategies against hundreds of plausible futures, for each of 22 species of concern. Our conceptual study seeks the strengths and vulnerabilities of each strategy across many possible future directions, facilitating both decision-making amongst strategies and emergence of robust and adaptive conservation plans. We anticipate our approach to offer an innovative framework to complement classic species conservation planning methods by reducing sensitivity to climate change uncertainty and improving the overall performance of conservation actions.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70293\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.70293","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在设计新的保护区时,保护管理者经常使用生物气候模型来预测气候变化对物种分布的影响。最近的研究表明,这些模型的结果在方向和量级上经常不同,产生了不确定性,损害了它们指导保护计划的价值。传统方法倾向于通过设计自适应策略或使预测模型复杂化来最小化这种不确定性。然而,当不确定性变得太大时,这些方法可能被证明是不够的,就像气候变化一样。在这里,我们不是试图减少不确定性,而是建议拥抱和重视它,以寻求尽可能强大的保护措施,以应对许多可能的未来。通过将这种“稳健决策”框架应用于保护,我们对22种关注物种中的每一种进行了针对数百种可能未来的五种一般保护策略的压力测试。我们的概念性研究在许多可能的未来方向上寻求每种策略的优势和弱点,促进策略之间的决策和强大的适应性保护计划的出现。我们期望我们的方法能够提供一个创新的框架,通过降低对气候变化不确定性的敏感性和提高保护行动的整体绩效来补充经典的物种保护规划方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Robust Conservation Planning for Biodiversity Under Climate Change Uncertainty

Robust Conservation Planning for Biodiversity Under Climate Change Uncertainty

When designing new protected areas, conservation managers often use bioclimatic models to anticipate the effects of climate change on species distributions. Recent studies have shown that the outputs of such models frequently differ in direction and magnitude, generating uncertainties that compromise their value for guiding conservation plans. Traditional approaches tend to minimise this uncertainty by designing adaptive strategies or by complexifying predictive models. However, these approaches may prove inadequate when uncertainty grows too large, as is the case with climate change. Here, rather than attempting to reduce uncertainty, we propose to embrace and value it in order to seek conservation measures that are as robust as possible to many plausible futures. By adapting this “Robust Decision Making” framework to conservation, we stress tested five generic conservation strategies against hundreds of plausible futures, for each of 22 species of concern. Our conceptual study seeks the strengths and vulnerabilities of each strategy across many possible future directions, facilitating both decision-making amongst strategies and emergence of robust and adaptive conservation plans. We anticipate our approach to offer an innovative framework to complement classic species conservation planning methods by reducing sensitivity to climate change uncertainty and improving the overall performance of conservation actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology
Global Change Biology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
5.20%
发文量
497
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Global Change Biology is an environmental change journal committed to shaping the future and addressing the world's most pressing challenges, including sustainability, climate change, environmental protection, food and water safety, and global health. Dedicated to fostering a profound understanding of the impacts of global change on biological systems and offering innovative solutions, the journal publishes a diverse range of content, including primary research articles, technical advances, research reviews, reports, opinions, perspectives, commentaries, and letters. Starting with the 2024 volume, Global Change Biology will transition to an online-only format, enhancing accessibility and contributing to the evolution of scholarly communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信