与美国核能发电相关的生命周期温室气体排放

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jun Hong Clarence Ng, Pradeep Vyawahare, Pahola Thathiana Benavides, Yu Gan, Pingping Sun, Richard Boardman, Jason Marcinkoski, Amgad Elgowainy
{"title":"与美国核能发电相关的生命周期温室气体排放","authors":"Jun Hong Clarence Ng,&nbsp;Pradeep Vyawahare,&nbsp;Pahola Thathiana Benavides,&nbsp;Yu Gan,&nbsp;Pingping Sun,&nbsp;Richard Boardman,&nbsp;Jason Marcinkoski,&nbsp;Amgad Elgowainy","doi":"10.1111/jiec.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, tax credits of up to $3/kgH<sub>2</sub> are available to hydrogen producers if they generate emissions at levels below 0.45 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>, spurring producers to explore how hydrogen production via electrolysis using electricity generated by nuclear power may qualify for such tax credits. With uranium as a primary fuel for nuclear power plants (NPPs) and no on-site emissions, the <i>upstream</i> emissions associated with nuclear fuel supply chains largely determine the carbon intensity of nuclear energy. Using the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) model, we evaluated the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of uranium production and the use of uranium to generate electricity in light water reactor (LWR) NPPs. We evaluated the process chemicals and energy inputs throughout the nuclear fuel supply chain to identify the major contributors to nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Such emissions are estimated at 3.0 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh at NPPs in the United States. The greatest share of nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions—comprising 53% of total emissions—are associated with electricity consumption throughout the fuel supply chain. We extended the analysis to include an evaluation of the carbon intensity of H<sub>2</sub> production via electrolysis using nuclear power from LWRs. Finally, we examined the impact of future (2035 and 2050) electricity supply chain scenarios on nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Our analysis revealed a decrease of 33% (2035) and 46% (2050) in the carbon intensity of nuclear electricity relative to current nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"29 3","pages":"719-732"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with nuclear power generation in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Jun Hong Clarence Ng,&nbsp;Pradeep Vyawahare,&nbsp;Pahola Thathiana Benavides,&nbsp;Yu Gan,&nbsp;Pingping Sun,&nbsp;Richard Boardman,&nbsp;Jason Marcinkoski,&nbsp;Amgad Elgowainy\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jiec.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, tax credits of up to $3/kgH<sub>2</sub> are available to hydrogen producers if they generate emissions at levels below 0.45 kgCO<sub>2</sub>e/kgH<sub>2</sub>, spurring producers to explore how hydrogen production via electrolysis using electricity generated by nuclear power may qualify for such tax credits. With uranium as a primary fuel for nuclear power plants (NPPs) and no on-site emissions, the <i>upstream</i> emissions associated with nuclear fuel supply chains largely determine the carbon intensity of nuclear energy. Using the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) model, we evaluated the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of uranium production and the use of uranium to generate electricity in light water reactor (LWR) NPPs. We evaluated the process chemicals and energy inputs throughout the nuclear fuel supply chain to identify the major contributors to nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Such emissions are estimated at 3.0 gCO<sub>2</sub>e/kWh at NPPs in the United States. The greatest share of nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions—comprising 53% of total emissions—are associated with electricity consumption throughout the fuel supply chain. We extended the analysis to include an evaluation of the carbon intensity of H<sub>2</sub> production via electrolysis using nuclear power from LWRs. Finally, we examined the impact of future (2035 and 2050) electricity supply chain scenarios on nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Our analysis revealed a decrease of 33% (2035) and 46% (2050) in the carbon intensity of nuclear electricity relative to current nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"719-732\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据《2022年通货膨胀减少法》,如果氢气生产商的排放量低于0.45千克二氧化碳当量/千克温室气体当量,则可获得高达3美元/千克温室气体当量的税收抵免,这促使生产商探索如何利用核电产生的电力通过电解制氢来获得此类税收抵免。由于铀是核电站的主要燃料,而且没有现场排放,因此与核燃料供应链相关的上游排放在很大程度上决定了核能的碳强度。利用GREET(温室气体、管制排放和技术中的能源使用)模型,我们评估了轻水堆(LWR)核电站铀生产和铀发电的生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放。我们评估了整个核燃料供应链的工艺化学品和能源投入,以确定核燃料循环温室气体排放的主要贡献者。据估计,美国核电站的此类排放量为每千瓦时3.0克二氧化碳当量。核燃料循环温室气体排放的最大份额(占总排放量的53%)与整个燃料供应链的电力消耗有关。我们扩展了分析,包括对利用轻水堆核电通过电解制氢的碳强度的评估。最后,我们研究了未来(2035年和2050年)电力供应链情景对核燃料循环温室气体排放的影响。我们的分析显示,相对于目前的核燃料循环温室气体排放,核电的碳强度将下降33%(2035年)和46%(2050年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with nuclear power generation in the United States

Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with nuclear power generation in the United States

Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, tax credits of up to $3/kgH2 are available to hydrogen producers if they generate emissions at levels below 0.45 kgCO2e/kgH2, spurring producers to explore how hydrogen production via electrolysis using electricity generated by nuclear power may qualify for such tax credits. With uranium as a primary fuel for nuclear power plants (NPPs) and no on-site emissions, the upstream emissions associated with nuclear fuel supply chains largely determine the carbon intensity of nuclear energy. Using the GREET (Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Technologies) model, we evaluated the life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of uranium production and the use of uranium to generate electricity in light water reactor (LWR) NPPs. We evaluated the process chemicals and energy inputs throughout the nuclear fuel supply chain to identify the major contributors to nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Such emissions are estimated at 3.0 gCO2e/kWh at NPPs in the United States. The greatest share of nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions—comprising 53% of total emissions—are associated with electricity consumption throughout the fuel supply chain. We extended the analysis to include an evaluation of the carbon intensity of H2 production via electrolysis using nuclear power from LWRs. Finally, we examined the impact of future (2035 and 2050) electricity supply chain scenarios on nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions. Our analysis revealed a decrease of 33% (2035) and 46% (2050) in the carbon intensity of nuclear electricity relative to current nuclear fuel cycle GHG emissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信