在热带田园景观中,大而孤立的树木比森林碎片中的小树死亡率更高

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Cristina Barber, Jennyffer Cruz, Sarah J. Graves, Stephanie A. Bohlman, Pieter A. Zuidema, Gregory P. Asner, Aaron Carignan, Vicente Vasquez, Jodi Brandt, T. Trevor Caughlin
{"title":"在热带田园景观中,大而孤立的树木比森林碎片中的小树死亡率更高","authors":"Cristina Barber,&nbsp;Jennyffer Cruz,&nbsp;Sarah J. Graves,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Bohlman,&nbsp;Pieter A. Zuidema,&nbsp;Gregory P. Asner,&nbsp;Aaron Carignan,&nbsp;Vicente Vasquez,&nbsp;Jodi Brandt,&nbsp;T. Trevor Caughlin","doi":"10.1002/eap.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agricultural tree cover is declining globally, including the loss of large, scattered trees that function as keystone structures. Understanding the drivers of agricultural tree loss could help prevent further declines. However, the drivers of agricultural tree mortality vary across scales, from individual trees to landscapes, complicating efforts to quantify mortality risk. We applied high-resolution remote sensing and multi-method occupancy models to test hypotheses of drivers of tree mortality in a pastoral landscape of Southwestern Panama. Our approach enabled us to identify individual tree mortality across a &gt;20,000 ha area, encompassing a wide range of land use intensity. Neighboring tree cover was the strongest predictor of mortality, with a higher probability of death for isolated trees relative to trees with many neighbors. Landscape-level covariates also predicted mortality risk, including higher mortality closer to roads and in parcels with larger area. These results implicate land use intensity as a primary driver of agricultural tree loss in our study area. At the individual tree level, we found that larger trees were more likely to die than smaller trees. Our study suggests that the trees with high ecosystem service value in a fragmented landscape—large, isolated trees—also face the highest mortality risk. Supporting agricultural practices that maintain trees in pastures is likely to decrease tree mortality in our study site, broadly representative of cattle ranching landscapes across Latin America. Our workflow could be implemented in other landscapes globally to prioritize agricultural tree conservation, paving the way for increased tree survival and improved ecosystem services.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"35 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large, isolated trees have higher mortality than smaller trees in forest fragments across a tropical pastoral landscape\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Barber,&nbsp;Jennyffer Cruz,&nbsp;Sarah J. Graves,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Bohlman,&nbsp;Pieter A. Zuidema,&nbsp;Gregory P. Asner,&nbsp;Aaron Carignan,&nbsp;Vicente Vasquez,&nbsp;Jodi Brandt,&nbsp;T. Trevor Caughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eap.70046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Agricultural tree cover is declining globally, including the loss of large, scattered trees that function as keystone structures. Understanding the drivers of agricultural tree loss could help prevent further declines. However, the drivers of agricultural tree mortality vary across scales, from individual trees to landscapes, complicating efforts to quantify mortality risk. We applied high-resolution remote sensing and multi-method occupancy models to test hypotheses of drivers of tree mortality in a pastoral landscape of Southwestern Panama. Our approach enabled us to identify individual tree mortality across a &gt;20,000 ha area, encompassing a wide range of land use intensity. Neighboring tree cover was the strongest predictor of mortality, with a higher probability of death for isolated trees relative to trees with many neighbors. Landscape-level covariates also predicted mortality risk, including higher mortality closer to roads and in parcels with larger area. These results implicate land use intensity as a primary driver of agricultural tree loss in our study area. At the individual tree level, we found that larger trees were more likely to die than smaller trees. Our study suggests that the trees with high ecosystem service value in a fragmented landscape—large, isolated trees—also face the highest mortality risk. Supporting agricultural practices that maintain trees in pastures is likely to decrease tree mortality in our study site, broadly representative of cattle ranching landscapes across Latin America. Our workflow could be implemented in other landscapes globally to prioritize agricultural tree conservation, paving the way for increased tree survival and improved ecosystem services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"volume\":\"35 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.70046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球范围内的农业树木覆盖率正在下降,包括作为基石结构的大型分散树木的损失。了解农业树木损失的驱动因素可以帮助防止进一步的下降。然而,农业树木死亡的驱动因素因尺度而异,从单个树木到景观,使量化死亡风险的努力复杂化。本文应用高分辨率遥感和多方法占用模型,对巴拿马西南部田园景观中树木死亡驱动因素的假设进行了检验。我们的方法使我们能够确定20,000公顷区域内的单个树木死亡率,包括广泛的土地利用强度。邻近的树木覆盖是死亡率最强的预测因子,相对于有许多邻居的树木,孤立树木的死亡概率更高。景观水平的协变量也可以预测死亡风险,包括靠近道路和面积较大的地块的死亡率更高。这些结果表明,土地利用强度是我们研究区域农业树木损失的主要驱动因素。在单个树的水平上,我们发现较大的树比较小的树更容易死亡。我们的研究表明,在破碎景观中具有高生态系统服务价值的树木-大型,孤立的树木-也面临最高的死亡风险。在我们的研究地点,支持维持牧场树木的农业实践可能会降低树木死亡率,这在拉丁美洲的牧场景观中具有广泛的代表性。我们的工作流程可以在全球其他景观中实施,以优先考虑农业树木保护,为提高树木存活率和改善生态系统服务铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large, isolated trees have higher mortality than smaller trees in forest fragments across a tropical pastoral landscape

Agricultural tree cover is declining globally, including the loss of large, scattered trees that function as keystone structures. Understanding the drivers of agricultural tree loss could help prevent further declines. However, the drivers of agricultural tree mortality vary across scales, from individual trees to landscapes, complicating efforts to quantify mortality risk. We applied high-resolution remote sensing and multi-method occupancy models to test hypotheses of drivers of tree mortality in a pastoral landscape of Southwestern Panama. Our approach enabled us to identify individual tree mortality across a >20,000 ha area, encompassing a wide range of land use intensity. Neighboring tree cover was the strongest predictor of mortality, with a higher probability of death for isolated trees relative to trees with many neighbors. Landscape-level covariates also predicted mortality risk, including higher mortality closer to roads and in parcels with larger area. These results implicate land use intensity as a primary driver of agricultural tree loss in our study area. At the individual tree level, we found that larger trees were more likely to die than smaller trees. Our study suggests that the trees with high ecosystem service value in a fragmented landscape—large, isolated trees—also face the highest mortality risk. Supporting agricultural practices that maintain trees in pastures is likely to decrease tree mortality in our study site, broadly representative of cattle ranching landscapes across Latin America. Our workflow could be implemented in other landscapes globally to prioritize agricultural tree conservation, paving the way for increased tree survival and improved ecosystem services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信