Haley Wong , Lauren Triglione , Richard Feinn , Juan C. Garbalosa
{"title":"评估运动员跳跃任务中神经认知负荷对躯干变异性的影响","authors":"Haley Wong , Lauren Triglione , Richard Feinn , Juan C. Garbalosa","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study’s purpose was to evaluate the effect of a neurocognitive load on hop task movement variability and outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen recreational and 18 NCAA Division 1 athletes performed 32 successful hopping trials in the absence and presence of a neurocognitive load. A 12-camera markerless motion analysis system recorded the hopping trials. The contact phase coordinate histories of the center of mass of the trunk (tCOM) of each hop were grouped according to presence or absence of neurocognitive load, hop direction, and hop number and the norm of the spanning set of the plus and minus 1 standard deviation curves were determined for each subject. Linear mixed models compared the load condition and athletic level and their interaction for each task outcome at a 0.05 alpha significance level.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>An effect of load condition or athletic level was not present (p > .0.05) on the mean tCOM span set hop 1 or 2 contact phase norms. The tCOM variability does not appear to be affected by athletic level or neurocognitive load potentially indicating that tCOM is a key variable the neuromuscular system is attempting to control.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>The stakes and stressors of the environment in which the athlete is being tasked with performing in should be heightened to ensure the nervous system is practicing the balance between safety and success.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"121 ","pages":"Pages 233-238"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of neurocognitive load on trunk variability in athletes during a hopping task\",\"authors\":\"Haley Wong , Lauren Triglione , Richard Feinn , Juan C. Garbalosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study’s purpose was to evaluate the effect of a neurocognitive load on hop task movement variability and outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen recreational and 18 NCAA Division 1 athletes performed 32 successful hopping trials in the absence and presence of a neurocognitive load. A 12-camera markerless motion analysis system recorded the hopping trials. The contact phase coordinate histories of the center of mass of the trunk (tCOM) of each hop were grouped according to presence or absence of neurocognitive load, hop direction, and hop number and the norm of the spanning set of the plus and minus 1 standard deviation curves were determined for each subject. Linear mixed models compared the load condition and athletic level and their interaction for each task outcome at a 0.05 alpha significance level.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>An effect of load condition or athletic level was not present (p > .0.05) on the mean tCOM span set hop 1 or 2 contact phase norms. The tCOM variability does not appear to be affected by athletic level or neurocognitive load potentially indicating that tCOM is a key variable the neuromuscular system is attempting to control.</div></div><div><h3>Interpretations</h3><div>The stakes and stressors of the environment in which the athlete is being tasked with performing in should be heightened to ensure the nervous system is practicing the balance between safety and success.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gait & posture\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 233-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gait & posture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002310\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225002310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the impact of neurocognitive load on trunk variability in athletes during a hopping task
Background
This study’s purpose was to evaluate the effect of a neurocognitive load on hop task movement variability and outcome.
Methods
Eighteen recreational and 18 NCAA Division 1 athletes performed 32 successful hopping trials in the absence and presence of a neurocognitive load. A 12-camera markerless motion analysis system recorded the hopping trials. The contact phase coordinate histories of the center of mass of the trunk (tCOM) of each hop were grouped according to presence or absence of neurocognitive load, hop direction, and hop number and the norm of the spanning set of the plus and minus 1 standard deviation curves were determined for each subject. Linear mixed models compared the load condition and athletic level and their interaction for each task outcome at a 0.05 alpha significance level.
Findings
An effect of load condition or athletic level was not present (p > .0.05) on the mean tCOM span set hop 1 or 2 contact phase norms. The tCOM variability does not appear to be affected by athletic level or neurocognitive load potentially indicating that tCOM is a key variable the neuromuscular system is attempting to control.
Interpretations
The stakes and stressors of the environment in which the athlete is being tasked with performing in should be heightened to ensure the nervous system is practicing the balance between safety and success.
期刊介绍:
Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance.
The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.