{"title":"创伤暴露的潜在因素是什么?关于使用潜在分类分析来识别创伤亚型的评论","authors":"Erika J. Wolf , Mark W. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is latent about trauma exposure? Commentary on the use of latent class analysis for identifying trauma subtypes\",\"authors\":\"Erika J. Wolf , Mark W. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
What is latent about trauma exposure? Commentary on the use of latent class analysis for identifying trauma subtypes
Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.