创伤暴露的潜在因素是什么?关于使用潜在分类分析来识别创伤亚型的评论

Erika J. Wolf , Mark W. Miller
{"title":"创伤暴露的潜在因素是什么?关于使用潜在分类分析来识别创伤亚型的评论","authors":"Erika J. Wolf ,&nbsp;Mark W. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73841,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is latent about trauma exposure? Commentary on the use of latent class analysis for identifying trauma subtypes\",\"authors\":\"Erika J. Wolf ,&nbsp;Mark W. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xjmad.2025.100130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mood and anxiety disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950004425000276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

潜类分析(LCA)是一种“以人为中心”的分析方法,旨在识别由共同特征定义的个体亚群,这些特征将他们与更大群体中的其他群体区分开来。最近的许多研究将LCA应用于自我报告创伤暴露测量的数据,以努力确定临床有用的和/或具有病理性信息的创伤史“类型”。在这篇文章中,我们提供了这种分析方法的非技术概述及其在创伤暴露数据中的应用。我们对使用LCA来识别创伤暴露类型提出了关注:(a)对反映环境暴露的变量应用以人为中心的方法;(b)缺乏证据表明使用LCA比其他更直接和可推广的量化创伤暴露的方法提供更多信息;(c)未能显示潜在类别的相关因素(如风险因素、结局、治疗反应)有意义的差异;(d)将基于严重性的分类强加于维度变量上,提倡小班教学,以及对拟合统计的误解;(e)解释随着时间的推移,随着个人层面的变化而变化的阶级定义。总的来说,这些担忧让我们问,“创伤暴露的潜在因素是什么?”,并建议需要其他方法来量化和总结创伤暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What is latent about trauma exposure? Commentary on the use of latent class analysis for identifying trauma subtypes
Latent class analysis (LCA) is a “person-centered” analytic method designed to identify subgroups of individuals defined by a common characteristic that distinguishes them from other groups within a larger population. Many recent studies have applied LCA to data from self-report trauma exposure measures in an effort to identify clinically useful and/or nosologically informative trauma history “types.” In this article, we provide a non-technical overview of this analytic approach and its application to trauma exposure data. We raise concerns about the use of LCA for identifying trauma exposure types relating to: (a) the application of a person-centered approach to variables that reflect environmental exposures; (b) lack of evidence that use of LCA is more informative than other more straightforward and generalizable methods for quantifying trauma exposure; (c) failure to show meaningful differences in the correlates (e.g., risk factors, outcomes, treatment response) of latent classes; (d) forcing severity-based categories on variables that are dimensional, promotion of small classes, and misinterpretation of fit statistics; and (e) interpretation of changing class definitions over time as individual-level changes. Collectively, these concerns lead us to ask, “what is latent about trauma exposure?” and suggest the need for alternative approaches to quantifying and summarizing trauma exposure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders
Journal of mood and anxiety disorders Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General), Behavioral Neuroscience
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信