抛物槽式太阳能集热器吸收管内新型螺旋槽锥形湍流器的能量经济性分析

IF 6.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 THERMODYNAMICS
Sarminah Samad , Salman Saeidlou , Ibrahim Mahariq , Naoufel Kraiem , Ali Alamry , Priya A. Hoskeri , S.P. Ghoushchi
{"title":"抛物槽式太阳能集热器吸收管内新型螺旋槽锥形湍流器的能量经济性分析","authors":"Sarminah Samad ,&nbsp;Salman Saeidlou ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Mahariq ,&nbsp;Naoufel Kraiem ,&nbsp;Ali Alamry ,&nbsp;Priya A. Hoskeri ,&nbsp;S.P. Ghoushchi","doi":"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study introduces a novel spiral channeled conical turbulator (SCCT) to enhance the hydrothermal and economic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector. Key design parameters, including spiral channel width (1–3 mm) and pitch (1–9 mm), are investigated, and the results are compared to those of a plain conical turbulator (PCT) and plain absorber tube. The inclined surfaces of the PCT and SCCT induce a strong radial flow, significantly improving heat transfer. Heat transfer and friction coefficients exhibit a direct correlation with spiral channel pitch but an inverse relationship with channel width. The PCT achieves the highest heat transfer enhancement, up to 550 % over a plain tube. However, the SCCT's aerodynamic geometry, enabled by its spiral channels, reduces pressure drop, yielding a higher and optimal performance evaluation criterion (PEC) compared to the PCT. The SCCT achieves a maximum PEC of 3.05 at a channel pitch of 5 mm and a width of 3 mm. This results in a 375 % improvement in heat transfer and a 280 % increase in the friction coefficient compared to plain absorber tubes. Economically, the PCT outperforms, with a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of 0.405$/kWh and a payback time of 2.7 years. These results indicate that PCT is the optimal choice for heat transfer and economic performance, while SCCT is superior from a hydrothermal perspective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9658,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","volume":"73 ","pages":"Article 106462"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy-economy analysis of a novel spiral channeled conical turbulator inserted within the parabolic trough solar collector absorber tube\",\"authors\":\"Sarminah Samad ,&nbsp;Salman Saeidlou ,&nbsp;Ibrahim Mahariq ,&nbsp;Naoufel Kraiem ,&nbsp;Ali Alamry ,&nbsp;Priya A. Hoskeri ,&nbsp;S.P. Ghoushchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.csite.2025.106462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study introduces a novel spiral channeled conical turbulator (SCCT) to enhance the hydrothermal and economic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector. Key design parameters, including spiral channel width (1–3 mm) and pitch (1–9 mm), are investigated, and the results are compared to those of a plain conical turbulator (PCT) and plain absorber tube. The inclined surfaces of the PCT and SCCT induce a strong radial flow, significantly improving heat transfer. Heat transfer and friction coefficients exhibit a direct correlation with spiral channel pitch but an inverse relationship with channel width. The PCT achieves the highest heat transfer enhancement, up to 550 % over a plain tube. However, the SCCT's aerodynamic geometry, enabled by its spiral channels, reduces pressure drop, yielding a higher and optimal performance evaluation criterion (PEC) compared to the PCT. The SCCT achieves a maximum PEC of 3.05 at a channel pitch of 5 mm and a width of 3 mm. This results in a 375 % improvement in heat transfer and a 280 % increase in the friction coefficient compared to plain absorber tubes. Economically, the PCT outperforms, with a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of 0.405$/kWh and a payback time of 2.7 years. These results indicate that PCT is the optimal choice for heat transfer and economic performance, while SCCT is superior from a hydrothermal perspective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"volume\":\"73 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007221\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"THERMODYNAMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies in Thermal Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X25007221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"THERMODYNAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了提高抛物槽太阳能集热器的热液性能和经济性能,本文设计了一种新型的螺旋通道锥形湍流器。研究了螺旋通道宽度(1 ~ 3mm)和螺距(1 ~ 9mm)等关键设计参数,并与平面锥形湍流器(PCT)和平面吸收管的设计结果进行了比较。PCT和SCCT的倾斜表面诱导了强烈的径向流动,显著改善了传热。换热系数和摩擦系数与螺旋沟道节距成正相关,与沟道宽度成反比。与普通管相比,PCT实现了最高的传热增强,高达550%。然而,SCCT的气动几何结构,通过其螺旋通道,减少了压降,与PCT相比,产生了更高和最佳的性能评估标准(PEC), SCCT在通道间距为5毫米,宽度为3毫米时,最大PEC为3.05。与普通吸收管相比,传热性能提高了375%,摩擦系数提高了280%。从经济上讲,PCT表现优异,其平准化能源成本(LCOE)为0.405美元/千瓦时,投资回收期为2.7年。这些结果表明,从传热和经济性能的角度来看,PCT是最佳选择,而从热液角度来看,SCCT更优。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy-economy analysis of a novel spiral channeled conical turbulator inserted within the parabolic trough solar collector absorber tube
This study introduces a novel spiral channeled conical turbulator (SCCT) to enhance the hydrothermal and economic performance of a parabolic trough solar collector. Key design parameters, including spiral channel width (1–3 mm) and pitch (1–9 mm), are investigated, and the results are compared to those of a plain conical turbulator (PCT) and plain absorber tube. The inclined surfaces of the PCT and SCCT induce a strong radial flow, significantly improving heat transfer. Heat transfer and friction coefficients exhibit a direct correlation with spiral channel pitch but an inverse relationship with channel width. The PCT achieves the highest heat transfer enhancement, up to 550 % over a plain tube. However, the SCCT's aerodynamic geometry, enabled by its spiral channels, reduces pressure drop, yielding a higher and optimal performance evaluation criterion (PEC) compared to the PCT. The SCCT achieves a maximum PEC of 3.05 at a channel pitch of 5 mm and a width of 3 mm. This results in a 375 % improvement in heat transfer and a 280 % increase in the friction coefficient compared to plain absorber tubes. Economically, the PCT outperforms, with a levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of 0.405$/kWh and a payback time of 2.7 years. These results indicate that PCT is the optimal choice for heat transfer and economic performance, while SCCT is superior from a hydrothermal perspective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Case Studies in Thermal Engineering Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
812
审稿时长
76 days
期刊介绍: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering provides a forum for the rapid publication of short, structured Case Studies in Thermal Engineering and related Short Communications. It provides an essential compendium of case studies for researchers and practitioners in the field of thermal engineering and others who are interested in aspects of thermal engineering cases that could affect other engineering processes. The journal not only publishes new and novel case studies, but also provides a forum for the publication of high quality descriptions of classic thermal engineering problems. The scope of the journal includes case studies of thermal engineering problems in components, devices and systems using existing experimental and numerical techniques in the areas of mechanical, aerospace, chemical, medical, thermal management for electronics, heat exchangers, regeneration, solar thermal energy, thermal storage, building energy conservation, and power generation. Case studies of thermal problems in other areas will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信