从均龄轮作林业向多功能森林景观过渡？-瑞典的挑战和行动案例研究

IF 9.2 1区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY

Landscape and Urban Planning Pub Date : 2025-06-11 DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105439

Per Angelstam , Lucas Dawson

{"title":"从均龄轮作林业向多功能森林景观过渡？-瑞典的挑战和行动案例研究","authors":"Per Angelstam , Lucas Dawson","doi":"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Even-aged forest management is criticised for negative impacts on natural and cultural values, and on value chains dependent on multifunctional forest landscapes.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We identify barriers and bridges supporting the development of multifunctional forest landscapes. Examining five decades of projects aimed at landscape planning in the Swedish Tiveden forest massif, we selected the initiative Collaboration Tiveden for learning through evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using document reviews, expert interviews, focus groups and participatory observations, we mapped efforts from the period 1969–2023 encouraging forest multifunctionality. Following the selected collaborative initiative from 2016 to 2023 we collected qualitative and quantitative data. Content analysis using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, and validation using independent data, identified patterns and core driving factors associated to efforts supporting transition from industrial forestry to forest multifunctionality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 11 efforts towards landscape planning. However, in spite of intensified forestry, increased need for protected areas, and pressure from tourists, landscape planning failed to materialise, and alternatives to even-aged forest management was restricted to demonstration sites and not scaled up. Qualitative and quantitative data demonstrate negative effects of intensified forestry on preferred landscape values. Nevertheless, branding using wilderness and narratives of multifunctionality support rural nature-based tourism. However, pressure from tourism on nature increased. Polarisation among actors hampers collaborative learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multifunctional forest landscapes require several different forest management systems and landscape planning. This requires learning about multiple forest values, and different forest owners’ and users’ preferences. While learning through evaluation is important, evidence-based mapping of states and trends of material and immaterial landscape values is not easily accessible, or ignored. Legacies of even-aged forest management are resistant to change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54744,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Urban Planning","volume":"263 ","pages":"Article 105439"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transitioning from even-aged rotation forestry to multifunctional forest landscapes? – A Swedish case study of challenges and actions\",\"authors\":\"Per Angelstam , Lucas Dawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Context</h3><div>Even-aged forest management is criticised for negative impacts on natural and cultural values, and on value chains dependent on multifunctional forest landscapes.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>We identify barriers and bridges supporting the development of multifunctional forest landscapes. Examining five decades of projects aimed at landscape planning in the Swedish Tiveden forest massif, we selected the initiative Collaboration Tiveden for learning through evaluation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using document reviews, expert interviews, focus groups and participatory observations, we mapped efforts from the period 1969–2023 encouraging forest multifunctionality. Following the selected collaborative initiative from 2016 to 2023 we collected qualitative and quantitative data. Content analysis using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, and validation using independent data, identified patterns and core driving factors associated to efforts supporting transition from industrial forestry to forest multifunctionality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 11 efforts towards landscape planning. However, in spite of intensified forestry, increased need for protected areas, and pressure from tourists, landscape planning failed to materialise, and alternatives to even-aged forest management was restricted to demonstration sites and not scaled up. Qualitative and quantitative data demonstrate negative effects of intensified forestry on preferred landscape values. Nevertheless, branding using wilderness and narratives of multifunctionality support rural nature-based tourism. However, pressure from tourism on nature increased. Polarisation among actors hampers collaborative learning.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Multifunctional forest landscapes require several different forest management systems and landscape planning. This requires learning about multiple forest values, and different forest owners’ and users’ preferences. While learning through evaluation is important, evidence-based mapping of states and trends of material and immaterial landscape values is not easily accessible, or ignored. Legacies of even-aged forest management are resistant to change.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"volume\":\"263 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Urban Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462500146X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Urban Planning","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016920462500146X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

历史悠久的森林管理因对自然和文化价值以及依赖于多功能森林景观的价值链产生负面影响而受到批评。我们确定了支持多功能森林景观发展的障碍和桥梁。考察了瑞典蒂夫登森林地块50年来的景观规划项目，我们选择了“合作蒂夫登”项目，通过评估进行学习。方法采用文献综述、专家访谈、焦点小组和参与式观察等方法，绘制了1969-2023年期间鼓励森林多功能性的工作图。根据2016年至2023年选定的合作计划，我们收集了定性和定量数据。利用体制分析与发展（IAD）框架进行内容分析，并利用独立数据进行验证，确定了与支持从工业林业向森林多功能过渡的努力相关的模式和核心驱动因素。结果我们确定了11项景观规划工作。然而，尽管加强了林业，对保护区的需求增加，以及来自游客的压力，景观规划未能实现，替代平均年龄森林管理的选择仅限于示范地点，没有扩大规模。定性和定量数据表明，集约化林业对首选景观价值的负面影响。然而，利用荒野的品牌和多功能叙事支持乡村自然旅游。然而，旅游业对自然的压力增加了。参与者之间的两极分化阻碍了协作学习。结论多功能森林景观需要多种不同的森林经营制度和景观规划。这需要了解多种森林价值，以及不同森林所有者和用户的偏好。虽然通过评估来学习很重要，但以证据为基础的物质和非物质景观价值的状态和趋势地图并不容易获得，或者被忽视。历史悠久的森林管理遗留下来的东西难以改变。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Transitioning from even-aged rotation forestry to multifunctional forest landscapes? – A Swedish case study of challenges and actions

Context

Even-aged forest management is criticised for negative impacts on natural and cultural values, and on value chains dependent on multifunctional forest landscapes.

Aim

We identify barriers and bridges supporting the development of multifunctional forest landscapes. Examining five decades of projects aimed at landscape planning in the Swedish Tiveden forest massif, we selected the initiative Collaboration Tiveden for learning through evaluation.

Methods

Using document reviews, expert interviews, focus groups and participatory observations, we mapped efforts from the period 1969–2023 encouraging forest multifunctionality. Following the selected collaborative initiative from 2016 to 2023 we collected qualitative and quantitative data. Content analysis using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework, and validation using independent data, identified patterns and core driving factors associated to efforts supporting transition from industrial forestry to forest multifunctionality.

Results

We identified 11 efforts towards landscape planning. However, in spite of intensified forestry, increased need for protected areas, and pressure from tourists, landscape planning failed to materialise, and alternatives to even-aged forest management was restricted to demonstration sites and not scaled up. Qualitative and quantitative data demonstrate negative effects of intensified forestry on preferred landscape values. Nevertheless, branding using wilderness and narratives of multifunctionality support rural nature-based tourism. However, pressure from tourism on nature increased. Polarisation among actors hampers collaborative learning.

Conclusions

Multifunctional forest landscapes require several different forest management systems and landscape planning. This requires learning about multiple forest values, and different forest owners’ and users’ preferences. While learning through evaluation is important, evidence-based mapping of states and trends of material and immaterial landscape values is not easily accessible, or ignored. Legacies of even-aged forest management are resistant to change.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Landscape and Urban Planning 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

15.20

自引率

6.60%

发文量

232

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Landscape and Urban Planning is an international journal that aims to enhance our understanding of landscapes and promote sustainable solutions for landscape change. The journal focuses on landscapes as complex social-ecological systems that encompass various spatial and temporal dimensions. These landscapes possess aesthetic, natural, and cultural qualities that are valued by individuals in different ways, leading to actions that alter the landscape. With increasing urbanization and the need for ecological and cultural sensitivity at various scales, a multidisciplinary approach is necessary to comprehend and align social and ecological values for landscape sustainability. The journal believes that combining landscape science with planning and design can yield positive outcomes for both people and nature.