改善生物碳和建筑木材的土地利用

IF 11.2 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
William Horan , Michael Quilligan , George Bishop , David Styles
{"title":"改善生物碳和建筑木材的土地利用","authors":"William Horan ,&nbsp;Michael Quilligan ,&nbsp;George Bishop ,&nbsp;David Styles","doi":"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Harvested wood product (HWP) inventory data in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases are limited in terms of geographical scope. Thus, LCA studies of wood products often neglect important variations in growth rates and wood densities across tree species and regions. Resulting discrepancies in biogenic carbon accounting along value chains for HWP used in construction undermines accurate representation of their climate mitigation potentials. This study provides LCA practitioners with a preliminary dataset of European Union country-specific biogenic carbon contents and land footprints for coniferous sawn wood by tree species. These are calculated by linking (1) merchantable wood productivity for even aged conifer plantations based on the EU Carbon Budget Model, and (2) sawn wood national product breakouts and sawmill product efficiency factors. Incorporating these factors into LCA of construction and wood value chains could enhance accuracy of climate mitigation attribution, and enable soft-linking of wood use in construction with land use models.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21153,"journal":{"name":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 108434"},"PeriodicalIF":11.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving biogenic carbon and land use accounting for construction wood\",\"authors\":\"William Horan ,&nbsp;Michael Quilligan ,&nbsp;George Bishop ,&nbsp;David Styles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Harvested wood product (HWP) inventory data in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases are limited in terms of geographical scope. Thus, LCA studies of wood products often neglect important variations in growth rates and wood densities across tree species and regions. Resulting discrepancies in biogenic carbon accounting along value chains for HWP used in construction undermines accurate representation of their climate mitigation potentials. This study provides LCA practitioners with a preliminary dataset of European Union country-specific biogenic carbon contents and land footprints for coniferous sawn wood by tree species. These are calculated by linking (1) merchantable wood productivity for even aged conifer plantations based on the EU Carbon Budget Model, and (2) sawn wood national product breakouts and sawmill product efficiency factors. Incorporating these factors into LCA of construction and wood value chains could enhance accuracy of climate mitigation attribution, and enable soft-linking of wood use in construction with land use models.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"volume\":\"222 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Conservation and Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492500312X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Conservation and Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092134492500312X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生命周期评估(LCA)数据库中的采伐木制品(HWP)库存数据在地理范围方面是有限的。因此,木材产品的LCA研究往往忽略了树种和地区之间生长速率和木材密度的重要变化。因此,建筑中使用的HWP在价值链上的生物碳核算存在差异,破坏了对其减缓气候变化潜力的准确表述。本研究为LCA从业者提供了欧盟各国针叶树锯材的生物碳含量和土地足迹的初步数据集。这些是通过联系(1)基于欧盟碳预算模型的针叶树人工林的商品木材生产率和(2)锯木国家产品突破和锯木厂产品效率因素来计算的。将这些因素纳入建筑和木材价值链的生命周期分析可以提高气候减缓归因的准确性,并使建筑中的木材使用与土地利用模型实现软链接。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving biogenic carbon and land use accounting for construction wood
Harvested wood product (HWP) inventory data in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases are limited in terms of geographical scope. Thus, LCA studies of wood products often neglect important variations in growth rates and wood densities across tree species and regions. Resulting discrepancies in biogenic carbon accounting along value chains for HWP used in construction undermines accurate representation of their climate mitigation potentials. This study provides LCA practitioners with a preliminary dataset of European Union country-specific biogenic carbon contents and land footprints for coniferous sawn wood by tree species. These are calculated by linking (1) merchantable wood productivity for even aged conifer plantations based on the EU Carbon Budget Model, and (2) sawn wood national product breakouts and sawmill product efficiency factors. Incorporating these factors into LCA of construction and wood value chains could enhance accuracy of climate mitigation attribution, and enable soft-linking of wood use in construction with land use models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Conservation and Recycling
Resources Conservation and Recycling 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
22.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
625
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The journal Resources, Conservation & Recycling welcomes contributions from research, which consider sustainable management and conservation of resources. The journal prioritizes understanding the transformation processes crucial for transitioning toward more sustainable production and consumption systems. It highlights technological, economic, institutional, and policy aspects related to specific resource management practices such as conservation, recycling, and resource substitution, as well as broader strategies like improving resource productivity and restructuring production and consumption patterns. Contributions may address regional, national, or international scales and can range from individual resources or technologies to entire sectors or systems. Authors are encouraged to explore scientific and methodological issues alongside practical, environmental, and economic implications. However, manuscripts focusing solely on laboratory experiments without discussing their broader implications will not be considered for publication in the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信