保护性耕作下的土壤有机碳权衡:碳储量与颗粒和矿物相关组分介导的稳定性

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Rui Jiang , Shuai Liu , Fahui Jiang , Zichun Guo , Samuel Adingo , Zengming Chen , Lei Gao , Xinhua Peng
{"title":"保护性耕作下的土壤有机碳权衡:碳储量与颗粒和矿物相关组分介导的稳定性","authors":"Rui Jiang ,&nbsp;Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Fahui Jiang ,&nbsp;Zichun Guo ,&nbsp;Samuel Adingo ,&nbsp;Zengming Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Gao ,&nbsp;Xinhua Peng","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Conservation tillage (CS) has been widely applied to maintain the sustainability of agricultural systems. Soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, including particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), facilitate the comprehension and prediction of further dynamics of SOC. However, there is a limited understanding of how CS affects the interplay of SOC fractions stocks and SOC stability (POC:MAOC ratio, briefly noted as P/M ratio) across soil layers. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively examine CS-induced changes in the SOC fractions stocks and their stability in the two depth soil layers (0–10 cm for upper topsoil and 10–20 cm for lower topsoil) under varying climatic factors, initial soil conditions, and agronomic practices. Our findings indicate that relative to conventional tillage (CT), CS notably increased SOC stock (14.7 %) in the upper topsoil by increasing POC stock (27.4 %), while decreasing SOC stability (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Adverse changes were observed in the lower topsoil layer. Experiment duration, straw-C input rate, and cropping system were the key factors moderating POC and MAOC stocks and SOC stability under CS (<em>P</em><sub>M</sub> &lt; 0.05). The positive effects of CS on SOC stock and its stability diminished with duration time in the upper topsoil layer. Conversely, CS significantly decreased POC stock (- 9.2 %) and enhanced SOC stability in the lower topsoil layer (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Compared to CT, the highest SOC stocks and the lowest SOC stability were observed under CS in the C input range of 4–6 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Our results highlight the importance of soil depth- and duration-induced differences in the accurate estimation of SOC stocks and stability dynamics under CS. The balance between SOC stock and its stability is calling for more attention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106704"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil organic carbon trade-offs under conservation tillage: Carbon stock versus stability mediated by particulate and mineral-associated fractions\",\"authors\":\"Rui Jiang ,&nbsp;Shuai Liu ,&nbsp;Fahui Jiang ,&nbsp;Zichun Guo ,&nbsp;Samuel Adingo ,&nbsp;Zengming Chen ,&nbsp;Lei Gao ,&nbsp;Xinhua Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Conservation tillage (CS) has been widely applied to maintain the sustainability of agricultural systems. Soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, including particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), facilitate the comprehension and prediction of further dynamics of SOC. However, there is a limited understanding of how CS affects the interplay of SOC fractions stocks and SOC stability (POC:MAOC ratio, briefly noted as P/M ratio) across soil layers. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively examine CS-induced changes in the SOC fractions stocks and their stability in the two depth soil layers (0–10 cm for upper topsoil and 10–20 cm for lower topsoil) under varying climatic factors, initial soil conditions, and agronomic practices. Our findings indicate that relative to conventional tillage (CT), CS notably increased SOC stock (14.7 %) in the upper topsoil by increasing POC stock (27.4 %), while decreasing SOC stability (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Adverse changes were observed in the lower topsoil layer. Experiment duration, straw-C input rate, and cropping system were the key factors moderating POC and MAOC stocks and SOC stability under CS (<em>P</em><sub>M</sub> &lt; 0.05). The positive effects of CS on SOC stock and its stability diminished with duration time in the upper topsoil layer. Conversely, CS significantly decreased POC stock (- 9.2 %) and enhanced SOC stability in the lower topsoil layer (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Compared to CT, the highest SOC stocks and the lowest SOC stability were observed under CS in the C input range of 4–6 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>. Our results highlight the importance of soil depth- and duration-induced differences in the accurate estimation of SOC stocks and stability dynamics under CS. The balance between SOC stock and its stability is calling for more attention.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106704\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002582\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002582","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

保护性耕作(CS)已被广泛应用于维持农业系统的可持续性。土壤有机碳(SOC)组分,包括颗粒有机碳(POC)和矿物伴生有机碳(MAOC),有助于进一步理解和预测土壤有机碳的动态。然而,对于CS如何影响土壤有机碳组分储量和有机碳稳定性(POC:MAOC比率,简称P/M比率)的相互作用,人们的理解有限。在此,我们进行了meta分析,定量研究了在不同气候因素、初始土壤条件和农作措施下,cs诱导的两层深层土壤(表层0-10 cm,下层10-20 cm)有机碳组分储量及其稳定性的变化。结果表明,与常规耕作(CT)相比,CS显著增加了表层土壤有机碳储量(14.7 %),增加了POC储量(27.4 %),但降低了SOC稳定性(P <; 0.01)。下层表土层发生了不利的变化。试验时间、秸秆- c投入量和种植制度是影响土壤有机碳储量和土壤有机碳稳定性的关键因素。0.05)。CS对表层土壤有机碳储量及其稳定性的积极影响随着持续时间的延长而减弱。相反,CS显著降低了POC储量(- 9.2 %),提高了表层土壤有机碳稳定性(P <; 0.01)。与CT相比,CS在4 ~ 6 Mg C ha−1 yr−1的碳输入范围内,SOC储量最高,SOC稳定性最低。我们的研究结果强调了土壤深度和持续时间引起的差异对准确估计土壤有机碳储量和稳定性动态的重要性。SOC库存与稳定性之间的平衡是一个值得关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil organic carbon trade-offs under conservation tillage: Carbon stock versus stability mediated by particulate and mineral-associated fractions
Conservation tillage (CS) has been widely applied to maintain the sustainability of agricultural systems. Soil organic carbon (SOC) fractions, including particulate organic carbon (POC) and mineral-associated organic carbon (MAOC), facilitate the comprehension and prediction of further dynamics of SOC. However, there is a limited understanding of how CS affects the interplay of SOC fractions stocks and SOC stability (POC:MAOC ratio, briefly noted as P/M ratio) across soil layers. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively examine CS-induced changes in the SOC fractions stocks and their stability in the two depth soil layers (0–10 cm for upper topsoil and 10–20 cm for lower topsoil) under varying climatic factors, initial soil conditions, and agronomic practices. Our findings indicate that relative to conventional tillage (CT), CS notably increased SOC stock (14.7 %) in the upper topsoil by increasing POC stock (27.4 %), while decreasing SOC stability (P < 0.01). Adverse changes were observed in the lower topsoil layer. Experiment duration, straw-C input rate, and cropping system were the key factors moderating POC and MAOC stocks and SOC stability under CS (PM < 0.05). The positive effects of CS on SOC stock and its stability diminished with duration time in the upper topsoil layer. Conversely, CS significantly decreased POC stock (- 9.2 %) and enhanced SOC stability in the lower topsoil layer (P < 0.01). Compared to CT, the highest SOC stocks and the lowest SOC stability were observed under CS in the C input range of 4–6 Mg C ha−1 yr−1. Our results highlight the importance of soil depth- and duration-induced differences in the accurate estimation of SOC stocks and stability dynamics under CS. The balance between SOC stock and its stability is calling for more attention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil & Tillage Research
Soil & Tillage Research 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research: The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信