纯碱负碳生产:工艺开发及可行性评价

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Maria F. Gutierrez*, Heike Lorenz and Peter Schulze, 
{"title":"纯碱负碳生产:工艺开发及可行性评价","authors":"Maria F. Gutierrez*,&nbsp;Heike Lorenz and Peter Schulze,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c0048310.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO<sub>2</sub> direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO<sub>2</sub> certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":39,"journal":{"name":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","volume":"64 23","pages":"11474–11496 11474–11496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Maria F. Gutierrez*,&nbsp;Heike Lorenz and Peter Schulze,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.iecr.5c0048310.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO<sub>2</sub> direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO<sub>2</sub> absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO<sub>2</sub> certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO<sub>2</sub> from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":\"64 23\",\"pages\":\"11474–11496 11474–11496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.iecr.5c00483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了生产负碳纯碱,氯碱电解、二氧化碳直接空气捕集和碳酸钠结晶结合在所谓的CODA工艺中。在本研究中,开发了四种CODA过程的变体,并通过建模和仿真的方法对其进行了评估。工艺设计的变化与CO2吸收技术、结晶策略和工艺可能产生的副产品有关。与使用液滴吸收器的工艺(337美元/吨苏打)相比,使用横流填料吸收器的工艺的资本支出(在195至209美元/吨苏打之间)更小。当与横流填充吸收塔相结合时,两步结晶策略的OPEX(150美元/吨苏打)比一步结晶(175美元/吨苏打)要小。销售过程副产品(如氢、氯和二氧化碳证书)的收入是CODA过程盈利能力的关键。最有前途的CODA(横流填充吸收器和两步结晶)从空气中消耗约0.15吨二氧化碳,每吨纯碱收益近200美元,使CODA成为一个值得扩大规模的有吸引力的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon-Negative Production of Soda Ash: Process Development and Feasibility Evaluation

Aiming to produce carbon-negative soda ash, chlor-alkali electrolysis, CO2 direct air capture, and sodium carbonate crystallization are combined in a so-called CODA process. In this study, four variants of the CODA process are developed and evaluated by means of modeling and simulation. Variations of the process design are related with the CO2 absorption technology, the crystallization strategy, and the possible byproducts of the process. The processes using a cross-flow packed absorber had a smaller CAPEX (between 195 and 209 USD/ton soda) than the process using a droplet absorber (337 USD/ton soda). When coupled with the cross-flow packed absorber, the two-step crystallization strategy had a smaller OPEX (150 USD/ton soda) than the one-step crystallization (175 USD/ton soda). The revenue of selling the process byproducts such as hydrogen, chlorine, and CO2 certificates was key to the profitability of the CODA process. The most promising CODA variant (cross-flow packed absorber and two-step crystallization) consumes about 0.15 tons of CO2 from the air and earned nearly 200 USD/ton soda ash, making CODA an attractive alternative that deserves to be scaled-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research
Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1467
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: ndustrial & Engineering Chemistry, with variations in title and format, has been published since 1909 by the American Chemical Society. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research is a weekly publication that reports industrial and academic research in the broad fields of applied chemistry and chemical engineering with special focus on fundamentals, processes, and products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信