植物过程很重要

IF 29.6 1区地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Nature Climate Change Pub Date : 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1038/s41558-025-02357-3

Alyssa Findlay

{"title":"植物过程很重要","authors":"Alyssa Findlay","doi":"10.1038/s41558-025-02357-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sajjad Raza, Tino Colombi and colleagues from the University of Nottingham take stock of research on soil carbon and assessed the extent to which plant processes have been investigated in peer-reviewed papers. Using bibliometric analysis, they find that less than 10% of the literature on soil carbon, climate change and land use has considered plant physiology. This represents a blind spot in understanding soil carbon, as well as future feedbacks under climate change. The authors call for the inclusion of plant scientists in soil carbon research and highlight the importance of long-term studies that include measurements of plant physiology alongside estimates of soil carbon stocks.Original reference: Soil 11, 363–369 (2025)","PeriodicalId":18974,"journal":{"name":"Nature Climate Change","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":29.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plant processes matter\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa Findlay\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41558-025-02357-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sajjad Raza, Tino Colombi and colleagues from the University of Nottingham take stock of research on soil carbon and assessed the extent to which plant processes have been investigated in peer-reviewed papers. Using bibliometric analysis, they find that less than 10% of the literature on soil carbon, climate change and land use has considered plant physiology. This represents a blind spot in understanding soil carbon, as well as future feedbacks under climate change. The authors call for the inclusion of plant scientists in soil carbon research and highlight the importance of long-term studies that include measurements of plant physiology alongside estimates of soil carbon stocks.Original reference: Soil 11, 363–369 (2025)\",\"PeriodicalId\":18974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Climate Change\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":29.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Climate Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02357-3\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-025-02357-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

诺丁汉大学的Sajjad Raza、Tino Colombi及其同事对土壤碳的研究进行了评估，并评估了同行评议论文中对植物过程的研究程度。通过文献计量分析，他们发现只有不到10%的关于土壤碳、气候变化和土地利用的文献考虑了植物生理学。这代表了在理解土壤碳以及气候变化下的未来反馈方面的盲点。这组作者呼吁将植物科学家纳入土壤碳研究，并强调长期研究的重要性，这些研究包括植物生理学的测量和土壤碳储量的估计。原始参考文献：土壤11,363-369 （2025）

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Plant processes matter

Sajjad Raza, Tino Colombi and colleagues from the University of Nottingham take stock of research on soil carbon and assessed the extent to which plant processes have been investigated in peer-reviewed papers. Using bibliometric analysis, they find that less than 10% of the literature on soil carbon, climate change and land use has considered plant physiology. This represents a blind spot in understanding soil carbon, as well as future feedbacks under climate change. The authors call for the inclusion of plant scientists in soil carbon research and highlight the importance of long-term studies that include measurements of plant physiology alongside estimates of soil carbon stocks.

Original reference: Soil 11, 363–369 (2025)

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nature Climate Change ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES

CiteScore

40.30

自引率

1.60%

发文量

267

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Nature Climate Change is dedicated to addressing the scientific challenge of understanding Earth's changing climate and its societal implications. As a monthly journal, it publishes significant and cutting-edge research on the nature, causes, and impacts of global climate change, as well as its implications for the economy, policy, and the world at large. The journal publishes original research spanning the natural and social sciences, synthesizing interdisciplinary research to provide a comprehensive understanding of climate change. It upholds the high standards set by all Nature-branded journals, ensuring top-tier original research through a fair and rigorous review process, broad readership access, high standards of copy editing and production, rapid publication, and independence from academic societies and other vested interests. Nature Climate Change serves as a platform for discussion among experts, publishing opinion, analysis, and review articles. It also features Research Highlights to highlight important developments in the field and original reporting from renowned science journalists in the form of feature articles. Topics covered in the journal include adaptation, atmospheric science, ecology, economics, energy, impacts and vulnerability, mitigation, oceanography, policy, sociology, and sustainability, among others.