2004-2020年霍奇金淋巴瘤青少年和青壮年放疗趋势

IF 3.4
Kelsey L Corrigan, Amy M Berkman, Jillian Gunther, Clark R Andersen, Susan Wu, Amber Gibson, Branko Cuglievan, Miriam B Garcia, Gohar Manzar, Penny Fang, Brian De, Sairah Ahmed, Cesar Nunez, Michelle A T Hildebrandt, David C McCall, Susan K Parsons, Michael E Roth
{"title":"2004-2020年霍奇金淋巴瘤青少年和青壮年放疗趋势","authors":"Kelsey L Corrigan, Amy M Berkman, Jillian Gunther, Clark R Andersen, Susan Wu, Amber Gibson, Branko Cuglievan, Miriam B Garcia, Gohar Manzar, Penny Fang, Brian De, Sairah Ahmed, Cesar Nunez, Michelle A T Hildebrandt, David C McCall, Susan K Parsons, Michael E Roth","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) has excellent survival rates in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, diagnosed between ages 15 - 39 years). However, survivors are at risk for treatment-related late effects. While radiation therapy (RT) de-escalation/omission has emerged as an approach to minimize late effects, no prior studies have evaluated RT use over time in AYAs with HL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 40,717 AYAs diagnosed with HL between 2004 and 2020. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables were assessed using two-sample two-sided t-test or chi-square tests. RT use was summarized per year by frequency with 95% confidence intervals. The association of RT receipt with sociodemographic and clinical variables was modeled using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the AYAs included, 20.1% received RT, with a significant decline in RT use over time from 33.9% in 2004 to 9.3% in 2020 (p<0.0001). Use of mantle RT declined over time from 40% in 2004 to 0% in 2018 (p<0.0001). Female AYAs were consistently less likely to receive RT than males. Rural versus metro setting (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.34 - 2.14, p<0.0001) and private versus no insurance (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.42 - 1.76, p<0.0001) were associated with greater RT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of RT in AYAs with HL declined from 2004 - 2020, especially in female and uninsured AYAs.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>While use of RT declined overall for AYAs with HL, this was not equal across groups. Research is needed to better understand disparities in RT use by rurality and insurance status.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends in Radiation Use from 2004-2020 Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Hodgkin Lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Kelsey L Corrigan, Amy M Berkman, Jillian Gunther, Clark R Andersen, Susan Wu, Amber Gibson, Branko Cuglievan, Miriam B Garcia, Gohar Manzar, Penny Fang, Brian De, Sairah Ahmed, Cesar Nunez, Michelle A T Hildebrandt, David C McCall, Susan K Parsons, Michael E Roth\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) has excellent survival rates in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, diagnosed between ages 15 - 39 years). However, survivors are at risk for treatment-related late effects. While radiation therapy (RT) de-escalation/omission has emerged as an approach to minimize late effects, no prior studies have evaluated RT use over time in AYAs with HL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 40,717 AYAs diagnosed with HL between 2004 and 2020. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables were assessed using two-sample two-sided t-test or chi-square tests. RT use was summarized per year by frequency with 95% confidence intervals. The association of RT receipt with sociodemographic and clinical variables was modeled using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the AYAs included, 20.1% received RT, with a significant decline in RT use over time from 33.9% in 2004 to 9.3% in 2020 (p<0.0001). Use of mantle RT declined over time from 40% in 2004 to 0% in 2018 (p<0.0001). Female AYAs were consistently less likely to receive RT than males. Rural versus metro setting (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.34 - 2.14, p<0.0001) and private versus no insurance (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.42 - 1.76, p<0.0001) were associated with greater RT use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of RT in AYAs with HL declined from 2004 - 2020, especially in female and uninsured AYAs.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>While use of RT declined overall for AYAs with HL, this was not equal across groups. Research is needed to better understand disparities in RT use by rurality and insurance status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12281412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:霍奇金淋巴瘤(Hodgkin Lymphoma, HL)在青少年和青壮年(AYAs,诊断年龄在15 - 39岁之间)中有很好的生存率。然而,幸存者面临着与治疗相关的后期影响的风险。虽然放射治疗(RT)降级/遗漏已成为最小化晚期效应的方法,但之前没有研究评估过随着时间的推移,放疗在患有HL的AYAs中的使用情况。方法:使用国家癌症数据库,我们确定了2004年至2020年间诊断为HL的40,717名AYAs。采用双样本双侧t检验或卡方检验评估社会人口学和临床变量的差异。以95%的置信区间按频率总结每年的RT使用情况。RT接收与社会人口学和临床变量的关联使用逻辑回归建模。结果:在纳入的AYAs中,20.1%接受了放疗,随着时间的推移,放疗使用率显著下降,从2004年的33.9%下降到2020年的9.3% (p结论:2004 - 2020年,HL的AYAs的放疗使用率下降,尤其是女性和未参保的AYAs。影响:虽然患有HL的AYAs患者的RT使用总体上有所下降,但各组之间的情况并不相同。需要研究以更好地了解农村和保险状况在RT使用方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends in Radiation Use from 2004-2020 Among Adolescents and Young Adults with Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Background: Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) has excellent survival rates in adolescents and young adults (AYAs, diagnosed between ages 15 - 39 years). However, survivors are at risk for treatment-related late effects. While radiation therapy (RT) de-escalation/omission has emerged as an approach to minimize late effects, no prior studies have evaluated RT use over time in AYAs with HL.

Methods: Using the National Cancer Database, we identified 40,717 AYAs diagnosed with HL between 2004 and 2020. Differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables were assessed using two-sample two-sided t-test or chi-square tests. RT use was summarized per year by frequency with 95% confidence intervals. The association of RT receipt with sociodemographic and clinical variables was modeled using logistic regression.

Results: Of the AYAs included, 20.1% received RT, with a significant decline in RT use over time from 33.9% in 2004 to 9.3% in 2020 (p<0.0001). Use of mantle RT declined over time from 40% in 2004 to 0% in 2018 (p<0.0001). Female AYAs were consistently less likely to receive RT than males. Rural versus metro setting (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.34 - 2.14, p<0.0001) and private versus no insurance (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.42 - 1.76, p<0.0001) were associated with greater RT use.

Conclusion: Use of RT in AYAs with HL declined from 2004 - 2020, especially in female and uninsured AYAs.

Impact: While use of RT declined overall for AYAs with HL, this was not equal across groups. Research is needed to better understand disparities in RT use by rurality and insurance status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信