大隐静脉冲洗消融的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。

IF 1.5
Ahmed Azhar Ali, Ahmad ElGhamrey, Omar Ahmed AbuAlata, Ehab M Saad, Hossam ElWakeel
{"title":"大隐静脉冲洗消融的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Ahmed Azhar Ali, Ahmad ElGhamrey, Omar Ahmed AbuAlata, Ehab M Saad, Hossam ElWakeel","doi":"10.1177/02683555251348768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To assess the safety and efficacy of endovenous ablation of great saphenous varicose veins with flush ablation at the saphenofemoral junction.<b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with varicose veins related to the great saphenous vein (GSV) and undergoing endovenous thermal ablation between January 2020 and July 2024. All patients underwent either endovenous laser or microwave ablation. Primary endpoints included technical success and absence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ 2. Secondary endpoints included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrence, days to return to normal daily activity, and reintervention. Follow-up was performed at 1 week, 6 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success was defined as successful flush catheter placement at the SFJ under duplex guidance. Recurrence was assessed through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound.<b>Results:</b> 69 patients (79 limbs) were included with a mean age of 39.1 ± 12.5 y, and 30 were of male sex (43.5%). Technical success was achieved in all limbs. EHIT ≥2 was not documented at the first postoperative outpatient visit, and no DVT or PE were noted during follow-up (20.4 ± 11 months). Recurrence was documented in 2 limbs (2.5%). One limb required surgical reintervention, and the days to return to daily activity recorded a median of 15 days (IQR 10 - 30).<b>Conclusion:</b> Flush endovenous ablation may be a safe and effective technique for treating great saphenous varicose veins, demonstrating a low incidence of recurrence and deep vein thrombosis while maintaining high technical and clinical success rates. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting flush ablation strategies and highlight the need for further research to optimise procedural guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251348768"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of flush endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein: A retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Azhar Ali, Ahmad ElGhamrey, Omar Ahmed AbuAlata, Ehab M Saad, Hossam ElWakeel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02683555251348768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To assess the safety and efficacy of endovenous ablation of great saphenous varicose veins with flush ablation at the saphenofemoral junction.<b>Methods:</b> A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with varicose veins related to the great saphenous vein (GSV) and undergoing endovenous thermal ablation between January 2020 and July 2024. All patients underwent either endovenous laser or microwave ablation. Primary endpoints included technical success and absence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ 2. Secondary endpoints included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrence, days to return to normal daily activity, and reintervention. Follow-up was performed at 1 week, 6 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success was defined as successful flush catheter placement at the SFJ under duplex guidance. Recurrence was assessed through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound.<b>Results:</b> 69 patients (79 limbs) were included with a mean age of 39.1 ± 12.5 y, and 30 were of male sex (43.5%). Technical success was achieved in all limbs. EHIT ≥2 was not documented at the first postoperative outpatient visit, and no DVT or PE were noted during follow-up (20.4 ± 11 months). Recurrence was documented in 2 limbs (2.5%). One limb required surgical reintervention, and the days to return to daily activity recorded a median of 15 days (IQR 10 - 30).<b>Conclusion:</b> Flush endovenous ablation may be a safe and effective technique for treating great saphenous varicose veins, demonstrating a low incidence of recurrence and deep vein thrombosis while maintaining high technical and clinical success rates. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting flush ablation strategies and highlight the need for further research to optimise procedural guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phlebology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2683555251348768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phlebology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251348768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251348768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价隐股交界处冲洗消融治疗大隐静脉曲张的安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性研究2020年1月至2024年7月期间连续行大隐静脉(GSV)相关静脉曲张热消融的患者。所有患者均行静脉内激光或微波消融。主要终点包括技术成功和无吸热热致血栓形成(EHIT)≥2。次要终点包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、肺栓塞(PE)、复发、恢复正常日常活动的天数和再干预。随访时间分别为1周、6个月和每年一次。技术成功被定义为在双导下在SFJ成功放置冲洗导管。通过临床检查和双工超声评估复发情况。结果:69例患者(79条肢体),平均年龄39.1±12.5岁,男性30例(43.5%)。各方面都取得了技术上的成功。术后首次门诊未见EHIT≥2,随访(20.4±11个月)未见DVT或PE。2肢复发(2.5%)。一条肢体需要手术再干预,恢复日常活动的天数中位数为15天(IQR 10 - 30)。结论:冲洗腔内消融术治疗大隐静脉曲张安全有效,复发率低,深静脉血栓形成率低,技术和临床成功率高。我们的发现为支持冲洗消融策略提供了越来越多的证据,并强调了进一步研究以优化手术指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of flush endovenous ablation of the great saphenous vein: A retrospective study.

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of endovenous ablation of great saphenous varicose veins with flush ablation at the saphenofemoral junction.Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients with varicose veins related to the great saphenous vein (GSV) and undergoing endovenous thermal ablation between January 2020 and July 2024. All patients underwent either endovenous laser or microwave ablation. Primary endpoints included technical success and absence of endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ 2. Secondary endpoints included deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), recurrence, days to return to normal daily activity, and reintervention. Follow-up was performed at 1 week, 6 months, and annually thereafter. Technical success was defined as successful flush catheter placement at the SFJ under duplex guidance. Recurrence was assessed through clinical examination and duplex ultrasound.Results: 69 patients (79 limbs) were included with a mean age of 39.1 ± 12.5 y, and 30 were of male sex (43.5%). Technical success was achieved in all limbs. EHIT ≥2 was not documented at the first postoperative outpatient visit, and no DVT or PE were noted during follow-up (20.4 ± 11 months). Recurrence was documented in 2 limbs (2.5%). One limb required surgical reintervention, and the days to return to daily activity recorded a median of 15 days (IQR 10 - 30).Conclusion: Flush endovenous ablation may be a safe and effective technique for treating great saphenous varicose veins, demonstrating a low incidence of recurrence and deep vein thrombosis while maintaining high technical and clinical success rates. Our findings contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting flush ablation strategies and highlight the need for further research to optimise procedural guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信