[经皮肝活检患者出血并发症的危险因素]。

G Jia, D W Ding, Y Q Fang, T Li, L N Cui, Y L Shang, Y Han
{"title":"[经皮肝活检患者出血并发症的危险因素]。","authors":"G Jia, D W Ding, Y Q Fang, T Li, L N Cui, Y L Shang, Y Han","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20241031-00720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the effect of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical, laboratory, and demographic data of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2005 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of bleeding was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effects of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on the risk of postoperative bleeding. Furthermore, we assessed the bleeding risk in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2 885 liver perforations were performed in 2 364 patients, 98.4% of whom had an autoimmune liver disease. There were 27 cases of postoperative bleeding (0.9%). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that platelet count (PLT)(<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=0.975), coagulation dysfunction (international normalized ratio; INR)(<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=6.954), and cirrhosis (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=3.857) were associated with bleeding. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLT was an independent risk factor for bleeding (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=0.975). PLT scores of 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L and 65×10<sup>9</sup>/L can classify the bleeding risk of patients with thrombocytopenia into high, medium, and low risk. There was no difference in the risk of bleeding between the 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤50×10<sup>9</sup>/L and 50×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤99×10<sup>9</sup>/L groups (<i>P</i>>0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.10). The risk of bleeding in the 31×10<sup>9</sup>/L≤PLT≤40×10<sup>9</sup>/L group was higher than that in the 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤99×10<sup>9</sup>/L group (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=11.50) and was 0 in the 19×10<sup>9</sup>/L≤PLT≤30×10<sup>9</sup>/L group. The risk of bleeding in the 1.15<INR≤1.5 group was higher than that in the INR≤1.15 group, and the risk of bleeding was 0 when 1.5<INR≤2.5. Compared with other liver diseases, the risk of bleeding was not increased in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (<i>P</i>>0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.10). Furthermore, the bleeding cases were considered mild as the bleeding stopped after pressure hemostasis. <b>Conclusions:</b> PLT is an independent risk factor for bleeding after hepatocentesis. When the PLT is >40×10<sup>9</sup>/L, hepatocentesis can still be performed safely with appropriate management measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":68309,"journal":{"name":"中华内科杂志","volume":"64 6","pages":"542-548"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Risk factors for bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy].\",\"authors\":\"G Jia, D W Ding, Y Q Fang, T Li, L N Cui, Y L Shang, Y Han\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20241031-00720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate the effect of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. <b>Methods:</b> The clinical, laboratory, and demographic data of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2005 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of bleeding was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effects of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on the risk of postoperative bleeding. Furthermore, we assessed the bleeding risk in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2 885 liver perforations were performed in 2 364 patients, 98.4% of whom had an autoimmune liver disease. There were 27 cases of postoperative bleeding (0.9%). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that platelet count (PLT)(<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=0.975), coagulation dysfunction (international normalized ratio; INR)(<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=6.954), and cirrhosis (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=3.857) were associated with bleeding. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLT was an independent risk factor for bleeding (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>OR</i>=0.975). PLT scores of 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L and 65×10<sup>9</sup>/L can classify the bleeding risk of patients with thrombocytopenia into high, medium, and low risk. There was no difference in the risk of bleeding between the 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤50×10<sup>9</sup>/L and 50×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤99×10<sup>9</sup>/L groups (<i>P</i>>0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.10). The risk of bleeding in the 31×10<sup>9</sup>/L≤PLT≤40×10<sup>9</sup>/L group was higher than that in the 40×10<sup>9</sup>/L<PLT≤99×10<sup>9</sup>/L group (<i>P</i><0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=11.50) and was 0 in the 19×10<sup>9</sup>/L≤PLT≤30×10<sup>9</sup>/L group. The risk of bleeding in the 1.15<INR≤1.5 group was higher than that in the INR≤1.15 group, and the risk of bleeding was 0 when 1.5<INR≤2.5. Compared with other liver diseases, the risk of bleeding was not increased in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (<i>P</i>>0.05, <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup>=0.10). Furthermore, the bleeding cases were considered mild as the bleeding stopped after pressure hemostasis. <b>Conclusions:</b> PLT is an independent risk factor for bleeding after hepatocentesis. When the PLT is >40×10<sup>9</sup>/L, hepatocentesis can still be performed safely with appropriate management measures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":68309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华内科杂志\",\"volume\":\"64 6\",\"pages\":\"542-548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华内科杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20241031-00720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华内科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112138-20241031-00720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨血小板减少和凝血功能障碍对经皮肝活检患者出血并发症的影响。方法:回顾性分析2005年1月至2024年1月在空军医科大学第一附属医院行经皮肝活检患者的临床、实验室及人口学资料。记录出血发生率。采用单因素和多因素logistic回归分析来评估血小板减少和凝血功能障碍对术后出血风险的影响。此外,我们评估了自身免疫性肝炎患者的出血风险。结果:2 364例患者共行肝穿孔2 885例,其中98.4%为自身免疫性肝病。术后出血27例(0.9%)。单因素logistic回归分析显示,血小板计数(PLT)(POR=0.975)、凝血功能障碍(国际标准化比值;INR (POR=6.954)和肝硬化(POR=3.857)与出血相关。多因素logistic回归分析显示,PLT是出血的独立危险因素(POR=0.975)。PLT评分40×109/L和65×109/L可将血小板减少患者的出血风险分为高、中、低风险。40×109/L9/L组与50×109/L9/L组出血风险比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05, χ2=0.10)。31×109/L≤PLT≤40×109/L组出血风险高于40×109/L9/L组(Pχ2=11.50), 19×109/L≤PLT≤30×109/L组出血风险为0。出血风险在1.15P < 0.05, χ2=0.10)。此外,出血病例经加压止血后出血停止,被认为是轻微的。结论:PLT是肝穿刺后出血的独立危险因素。当PLT为>40×109/L时,通过适当的管理措施,仍可安全进行肝穿刺。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Risk factors for bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy].

Objective: To investigate the effect of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on bleeding complications in patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy. Methods: The clinical, laboratory, and demographic data of patients undergoing percutaneous liver biopsy at the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University from January 2005 to January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of bleeding was recorded. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess the effects of thrombocytopenia and coagulation dysfunction on the risk of postoperative bleeding. Furthermore, we assessed the bleeding risk in patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Results: A total of 2 885 liver perforations were performed in 2 364 patients, 98.4% of whom had an autoimmune liver disease. There were 27 cases of postoperative bleeding (0.9%). The univariate logistic regression analysis showed that platelet count (PLT)(P<0.05, OR=0.975), coagulation dysfunction (international normalized ratio; INR)(P<0.05, OR=6.954), and cirrhosis (P<0.05, OR=3.857) were associated with bleeding. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that PLT was an independent risk factor for bleeding (P<0.05, OR=0.975). PLT scores of 40×109/L and 65×109/L can classify the bleeding risk of patients with thrombocytopenia into high, medium, and low risk. There was no difference in the risk of bleeding between the 40×109/L9/L and 50×109/L9/L groups (P>0.05, χ2=0.10). The risk of bleeding in the 31×109/L≤PLT≤40×109/L group was higher than that in the 40×109/L9/L group (P<0.05, χ2=11.50) and was 0 in the 19×109/L≤PLT≤30×109/L group. The risk of bleeding in the 1.15P>0.05, χ2=0.10). Furthermore, the bleeding cases were considered mild as the bleeding stopped after pressure hemostasis. Conclusions: PLT is an independent risk factor for bleeding after hepatocentesis. When the PLT is >40×109/L, hepatocentesis can still be performed safely with appropriate management measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19688
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信