认知和社会活动在降低痴呆风险研究中的应用综述。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Aging & Mental Health Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-08 DOI:10.1080/13607863.2025.2515519
Jeroen Bruinsma, Ruud Roodbeen, Giselle G A Menting, Kay Deckers, Stevie Hendriks, Rik Crutzen
{"title":"认知和社会活动在降低痴呆风险研究中的应用综述。","authors":"Jeroen Bruinsma, Ruud Roodbeen, Giselle G A Menting, Kay Deckers, Stevie Hendriks, Rik Crutzen","doi":"10.1080/13607863.2025.2515519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Engagement in cognitive and social activities may protect against dementia. However, insight into how to adequately measure activity engagement is a necessary precursor of science. This study explores (a) how cognitive and social activities are measured in research investigating protective activities against dementia, and (b) the extent to which preventive interventions promote activities that are operationalized in measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid scoping review was conducted on PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 58 studies, 38 had an observational design and predominantly used questionnaires to measure cognitive and social activities. A wide variety of items and themes were observed, including arts and crafts, social groups, exercise, games, outings, household tasks, education, music, multimedia use, reading, socializing, work or volunteering, and writing. There were considerable variations in item content, response scales, recall periods, and scoring methods. The 20 studies that reported on preventive interventions mainly focused on psychoeducation and (computerized) cognitive training, which do not fully align with activities measured in questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many researchers measure and promote cognitive and social activities but do this differently, leading to fragmented insights into which activities protect against dementia. Clarifying the concept and relevant aspects to measure would support the development of better measurements and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":55546,"journal":{"name":"Aging & Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"1788-1797"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A rapid scoping review on operationalizing cognitive and social activities in research on dementia risk reduction.\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen Bruinsma, Ruud Roodbeen, Giselle G A Menting, Kay Deckers, Stevie Hendriks, Rik Crutzen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13607863.2025.2515519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Engagement in cognitive and social activities may protect against dementia. However, insight into how to adequately measure activity engagement is a necessary precursor of science. This study explores (a) how cognitive and social activities are measured in research investigating protective activities against dementia, and (b) the extent to which preventive interventions promote activities that are operationalized in measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A rapid scoping review was conducted on PubMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 58 studies, 38 had an observational design and predominantly used questionnaires to measure cognitive and social activities. A wide variety of items and themes were observed, including arts and crafts, social groups, exercise, games, outings, household tasks, education, music, multimedia use, reading, socializing, work or volunteering, and writing. There were considerable variations in item content, response scales, recall periods, and scoring methods. The 20 studies that reported on preventive interventions mainly focused on psychoeducation and (computerized) cognitive training, which do not fully align with activities measured in questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many researchers measure and promote cognitive and social activities but do this differently, leading to fragmented insights into which activities protect against dementia. Clarifying the concept and relevant aspects to measure would support the development of better measurements and interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1788-1797\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aging & Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2515519\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging & Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2025.2515519","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:参与认知和社会活动可以预防痴呆症。然而,洞察如何充分衡量活动参与度是科学的必要前提。本研究探讨了(a)如何在调查痴呆症保护活动的研究中测量认知和社会活动,以及(b)预防性干预措施在多大程度上促进了测量中可操作的活动。方法:在PubMed上进行快速范围审查。结果:在58项研究中,38项研究采用观察设计,主要使用问卷调查来测量认知和社会活动。观察到各种各样的项目和主题,包括艺术和手工艺、社会团体、锻炼、游戏、郊游、家务、教育、音乐、多媒体使用、阅读、社交、工作或志愿服务以及写作。在项目内容、反应量表、回忆期和评分方法上有相当大的差异。关于预防干预的20项研究主要集中在心理教育和(计算机化的)认知训练上,这与问卷调查中测量的活动并不完全一致。结论:许多研究人员衡量和促进认知和社会活动,但方法不同,导致对哪些活动可以预防痴呆症的见解不完整。澄清概念和有关的衡量方面将有助于制定更好的衡量和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A rapid scoping review on operationalizing cognitive and social activities in research on dementia risk reduction.

Objectives: Engagement in cognitive and social activities may protect against dementia. However, insight into how to adequately measure activity engagement is a necessary precursor of science. This study explores (a) how cognitive and social activities are measured in research investigating protective activities against dementia, and (b) the extent to which preventive interventions promote activities that are operationalized in measurements.

Methods: A rapid scoping review was conducted on PubMed.

Results: Across 58 studies, 38 had an observational design and predominantly used questionnaires to measure cognitive and social activities. A wide variety of items and themes were observed, including arts and crafts, social groups, exercise, games, outings, household tasks, education, music, multimedia use, reading, socializing, work or volunteering, and writing. There were considerable variations in item content, response scales, recall periods, and scoring methods. The 20 studies that reported on preventive interventions mainly focused on psychoeducation and (computerized) cognitive training, which do not fully align with activities measured in questionnaires.

Conclusion: Many researchers measure and promote cognitive and social activities but do this differently, leading to fragmented insights into which activities protect against dementia. Clarifying the concept and relevant aspects to measure would support the development of better measurements and interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aging & Mental Health
Aging & Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Aging & Mental Health provides a leading international forum for the rapidly expanding field which investigates the relationship between the aging process and mental health. The journal addresses the mental changes associated with normal and abnormal or pathological aging, as well as the psychological and psychiatric problems of the aging population. The journal also has a strong commitment to interdisciplinary and innovative approaches that explore new topics and methods. Aging & Mental Health covers the biological, psychological and social aspects of aging as they relate to mental health. In particular it encourages an integrated approach for examining various biopsychosocial processes and etiological factors associated with psychological changes in the elderly. It also emphasizes the various strategies, therapies and services which may be directed at improving the mental health of the elderly and their families. In this way the journal promotes a strong alliance among the theoretical, experimental and applied sciences across a range of issues affecting mental health and aging. The emphasis of the journal is on rigorous quantitative, and qualitative, research and, high quality innovative studies on emerging topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信