组织伦理和区域保健网络:儿科激增和短缺的导航。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Emily Berkman, Douglas Diekema, Mithya Lewis-Newby
{"title":"组织伦理和区域保健网络:儿科激增和短缺的导航。","authors":"Emily Berkman, Douglas Diekema, Mithya Lewis-Newby","doi":"10.1353/pbm.2025.a962027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Washington state's plans for a public health response to a pandemic or natural disaster were largely untested prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual institutions were unprepared for a crisis of the scale and severity of the pandemic, and they faced a myriad of ethical questions that required expertise and experience. The pandemic also revealed the fundamental need for local, state, and regional collaboration during times of resource scarcity. As individual institutions scrambled to organize and implement strategies for dealing with scarcity in a way that was both effective and fair, the lack of a regional or national system to organize those efforts impaired a timely response and resulted in duplicated efforts and differing approaches. This article describes the authors' pediatric institutional response to the pandemic within the context of a broader cooperative statewide approach. The authors explain the rationale for starting with a utilitarian framework and the ways in which its shortcomings were addressed. The structures and approaches described continue to be utilized and modified for other situations that lead to resource scarcity of all kinds. Although changes at the national level to create a national response would be ideal, collaboration and investment at the state and regional level is both critical and pragmatic in ensuring that all patients can access the health care they need.</p>","PeriodicalId":54627,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","volume":"68 2","pages":"326-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Organizational Ethics and a Regional Health-Care Network: navigating surges and shortages in pediatrics.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Berkman, Douglas Diekema, Mithya Lewis-Newby\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/pbm.2025.a962027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Washington state's plans for a public health response to a pandemic or natural disaster were largely untested prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual institutions were unprepared for a crisis of the scale and severity of the pandemic, and they faced a myriad of ethical questions that required expertise and experience. The pandemic also revealed the fundamental need for local, state, and regional collaboration during times of resource scarcity. As individual institutions scrambled to organize and implement strategies for dealing with scarcity in a way that was both effective and fair, the lack of a regional or national system to organize those efforts impaired a timely response and resulted in duplicated efforts and differing approaches. This article describes the authors' pediatric institutional response to the pandemic within the context of a broader cooperative statewide approach. The authors explain the rationale for starting with a utilitarian framework and the ways in which its shortcomings were addressed. The structures and approaches described continue to be utilized and modified for other situations that lead to resource scarcity of all kinds. Although changes at the national level to create a national response would be ideal, collaboration and investment at the state and regional level is both critical and pragmatic in ensuring that all patients can access the health care they need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"326-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在COVID-19大流行之前,华盛顿州应对大流行或自然灾害的公共卫生计划在很大程度上未经测试。个别机构对大流行的规模和严重程度的危机毫无准备,它们面临着无数需要专业知识和经验的道德问题。大流行还表明,在资源短缺时期,地方、州和区域合作的根本必要性。由于个别机构争先恐后地组织和执行以有效和公平的方式处理短缺问题的战略,由于缺乏组织这些努力的区域或国家系统,妨碍了及时的反应,并造成重复的努力和不同的办法。这篇文章描述了作者的儿科机构在更广泛的全州合作方法的背景下对流行病的反应。作者解释了从功利主义框架开始的基本原理,以及解决其缺点的方法。所描述的结构和方法将继续用于和修改其他导致各种资源短缺的情况。虽然在国家一级进行改革以建立国家对策是理想的,但在州和区域一级进行合作和投资对于确保所有患者都能获得所需的卫生保健既关键又务实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Organizational Ethics and a Regional Health-Care Network: navigating surges and shortages in pediatrics.

Washington state's plans for a public health response to a pandemic or natural disaster were largely untested prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Individual institutions were unprepared for a crisis of the scale and severity of the pandemic, and they faced a myriad of ethical questions that required expertise and experience. The pandemic also revealed the fundamental need for local, state, and regional collaboration during times of resource scarcity. As individual institutions scrambled to organize and implement strategies for dealing with scarcity in a way that was both effective and fair, the lack of a regional or national system to organize those efforts impaired a timely response and resulted in duplicated efforts and differing approaches. This article describes the authors' pediatric institutional response to the pandemic within the context of a broader cooperative statewide approach. The authors explain the rationale for starting with a utilitarian framework and the ways in which its shortcomings were addressed. The structures and approaches described continue to be utilized and modified for other situations that lead to resource scarcity of all kinds. Although changes at the national level to create a national response would be ideal, collaboration and investment at the state and regional level is both critical and pragmatic in ensuring that all patients can access the health care they need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, an interdisciplinary scholarly journal whose readers include biologists, physicians, students, and scholars, publishes essays that place important biological or medical subjects in broader scientific, social, or humanistic contexts. These essays span a wide range of subjects, from biomedical topics such as neurobiology, genetics, and evolution, to topics in ethics, history, philosophy, and medical education and practice. The editors encourage an informal style that has literary merit and that preserves the warmth, excitement, and color of the biological and medical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信