基于放射组学的机器学习超声诊断颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病:RQS荟萃分析的系统综述。

IF 1.4 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Ultrasound Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-09 DOI:10.1007/s40477-025-01002-1
Sebastiano Vacca, Roberta Scicolone, Francesco Pisu, Riccardo Cau, Qi Yang, Andrea Annoni, Gianluca Pontone, Francesco Costa, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Andrew Nicolaides, Jasjit S Suri, Luca Saba
{"title":"基于放射组学的机器学习超声诊断颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病:RQS荟萃分析的系统综述。","authors":"Sebastiano Vacca, Roberta Scicolone, Francesco Pisu, Riccardo Cau, Qi Yang, Andrea Annoni, Gianluca Pontone, Francesco Costa, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Andrew Nicolaides, Jasjit S Suri, Luca Saba","doi":"10.1007/s40477-025-01002-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke, a leading global cause of mortality and neurological disability, is often associated with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease is crucial for appropriate treatment decisions. Radiomics, a quantitative image analysis technique, and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools in Ultrasound (US) imaging, potentially providing a helpful tool in the screening of such lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2005 to May 2023. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was used to assess methodological quality of studies included in the review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) assessed the risk of bias. Sensitivity, specificity, and logarithmic diagnostic odds ratio (logDOR) meta-analyses have been conducted, alongside an influence analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RQS assessed methodological quality, revealing an overall low score and consistent findings with other radiology domains. QUADAS-2 indicated an overall low risk, except for two studies with high bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated that radiomics-based ML models for predicting culprit plaques on US had a satisfactory performance, with a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.82. The logDOR analysis confirmed the positive results, yielding a pooled logDOR of 3.54. The summary ROC curve provided an AUC of 0.887.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics combined with ML provide high sensitivity and low false positive rate for carotid plaque vulnerability assessment on US. However, current evidence is not definitive, given the low overall study quality and high inter-study heterogeneity. High quality, prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential of these promising techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":51528,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":"587-597"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496308/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiomics-based machine learning atherosclerotic carotid artery disease in ultrasound: systematic review with meta-analysis of RQS.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastiano Vacca, Roberta Scicolone, Francesco Pisu, Riccardo Cau, Qi Yang, Andrea Annoni, Gianluca Pontone, Francesco Costa, Kosmas I Paraskevas, Andrew Nicolaides, Jasjit S Suri, Luca Saba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40477-025-01002-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke, a leading global cause of mortality and neurological disability, is often associated with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease is crucial for appropriate treatment decisions. Radiomics, a quantitative image analysis technique, and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools in Ultrasound (US) imaging, potentially providing a helpful tool in the screening of such lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2005 to May 2023. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was used to assess methodological quality of studies included in the review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) assessed the risk of bias. Sensitivity, specificity, and logarithmic diagnostic odds ratio (logDOR) meta-analyses have been conducted, alongside an influence analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RQS assessed methodological quality, revealing an overall low score and consistent findings with other radiology domains. QUADAS-2 indicated an overall low risk, except for two studies with high bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated that radiomics-based ML models for predicting culprit plaques on US had a satisfactory performance, with a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.82. The logDOR analysis confirmed the positive results, yielding a pooled logDOR of 3.54. The summary ROC curve provided an AUC of 0.887.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics combined with ML provide high sensitivity and low false positive rate for carotid plaque vulnerability assessment on US. However, current evidence is not definitive, given the low overall study quality and high inter-study heterogeneity. High quality, prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential of these promising techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"587-597\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12496308/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01002-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-025-01002-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卒中是全球死亡和神经功能障碍的主要原因,通常与颈动脉粥样硬化性疾病相关。区分有症状和无症状的颈动脉疾病对于适当的治疗决定至关重要。放射组学,一种定量图像分析技术和机器学习(ML)已经成为超声成像(US)中有前途的工具,可能为筛查此类病变提供有用的工具。方法:检索2005年1月~ 2023年5月Pubmed、Web of Science和Scopus数据库发表的相关研究。放射组学质量评分(RQS)用于评估纳入本综述的研究的方法学质量。诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)评估了偏倚风险。进行了敏感性、特异性和对数诊断优势比(logDOR)荟萃分析,以及影响分析。结果:RQS评估了方法学的质量,总体得分较低,与其他放射学领域的结果一致。除了两项高偏倚研究外,QUADAS-2显示总体风险较低。meta分析表明,基于放射组学的ML模型预测US的罪魁祸首斑块具有令人满意的性能,敏感性为0.84,特异性为0.82。logDOR分析证实了积极的结果,产生了3.54的合并logDOR。综合ROC曲线的AUC为0.887。结论:放射组学联合ML检测颈动脉斑块易损性灵敏度高,假阳性率低。然而,考虑到整体研究质量较低和研究间异质性较高,目前的证据并不确定。需要高质量的前瞻性研究来证实这些有前途的技术的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Radiomics-based machine learning atherosclerotic carotid artery disease in ultrasound: systematic review with meta-analysis of RQS.

Background: Stroke, a leading global cause of mortality and neurological disability, is often associated with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease. Distinguishing between symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery disease is crucial for appropriate treatment decisions. Radiomics, a quantitative image analysis technique, and machine learning (ML) have emerged as promising tools in Ultrasound (US) imaging, potentially providing a helpful tool in the screening of such lesions.

Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies published from January 2005 to May 2023. The Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) was used to assess methodological quality of studies included in the review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) assessed the risk of bias. Sensitivity, specificity, and logarithmic diagnostic odds ratio (logDOR) meta-analyses have been conducted, alongside an influence analysis.

Results: RQS assessed methodological quality, revealing an overall low score and consistent findings with other radiology domains. QUADAS-2 indicated an overall low risk, except for two studies with high bias. The meta-analysis demonstrated that radiomics-based ML models for predicting culprit plaques on US had a satisfactory performance, with a sensitivity of 0.84 and specificity of 0.82. The logDOR analysis confirmed the positive results, yielding a pooled logDOR of 3.54. The summary ROC curve provided an AUC of 0.887.

Conclusion: Radiomics combined with ML provide high sensitivity and low false positive rate for carotid plaque vulnerability assessment on US. However, current evidence is not definitive, given the low overall study quality and high inter-study heterogeneity. High quality, prospective studies are needed to confirm the potential of these promising techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ultrasound
Journal of Ultrasound RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ultrasound is the official journal of the Italian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB). The journal publishes original contributions (research and review articles, case reports, technical reports and letters to the editor) on significant advances in clinical diagnostic, interventional and therapeutic applications, clinical techniques, the physics, engineering and technology of ultrasound in medicine and biology, and in cross-sectional diagnostic imaging. The official language of Journal of Ultrasound is English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信