迈向健康公正的培训:美国初级保健住院医师项目中社区参与培训的回顾。

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Heather A Klusaritz, Kara Johnson, Laura Igarabuza, Giang T Nguyen, Elizabeth Harmon, Michael Bozzi, Peter F Cronholm
{"title":"迈向健康公正的培训:美国初级保健住院医师项目中社区参与培训的回顾。","authors":"Heather A Klusaritz, Kara Johnson, Laura Igarabuza, Giang T Nguyen, Elizabeth Harmon, Michael Bozzi, Peter F Cronholm","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A community-engaged approach to medicine, particularly primary care, is effective for health promotion. There is, however, limited evidence and no consensus on best training practices to ensure that physicians are trained adequately to practice community-engaged medicine. To define and determine how to fill this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review of literature on community-engaged activities in primary care resident training programs. The study sought to evaluate the quality of studied interventions and assess future research needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this systematic review, the study team searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO using key search terms related to graduate medical education, community engagement activities, and potential outcomes. The team selected and reviewed all English-language articles published through December 2024 that described interventions in which primary care residents participated in activities that occurred in community-based settings. The team analyzed studies with quantitative and qualitative results. They assessed study quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and assessed the quality of the community-engaged educational activity using a novel instrument called the Medical Education Engagement Quality Index (MEEQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study team identified and reviewed the full texts of 29 articles (10 quantitative, 10 qualitative, and 9 quantitative and qualitative articles). Interventions included community engagement activities with varied settings, study length, and learning objectives. Outcomes included a change in attitudes, knowledge, skills, and career choices. The mean MERSQI score was 9.0 (range, 5.5-11.5), and the mean MEEQI score was 6.2 (range, 4.0-10.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' findings revealed limited quality and substantial variability of the current literature. Future research should use more rigorous evaluation methods to determine which community-engaged curricular components can most effectively provide primary care resident physicians with the skills needed to provide high-quality primary care, particularly for vulnerable populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Training Toward Health Justice: A Review of Community-Engaged Training in Primary Care Residency Programs in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Heather A Klusaritz, Kara Johnson, Laura Igarabuza, Giang T Nguyen, Elizabeth Harmon, Michael Bozzi, Peter F Cronholm\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A community-engaged approach to medicine, particularly primary care, is effective for health promotion. There is, however, limited evidence and no consensus on best training practices to ensure that physicians are trained adequately to practice community-engaged medicine. To define and determine how to fill this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review of literature on community-engaged activities in primary care resident training programs. The study sought to evaluate the quality of studied interventions and assess future research needs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>For this systematic review, the study team searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO using key search terms related to graduate medical education, community engagement activities, and potential outcomes. The team selected and reviewed all English-language articles published through December 2024 that described interventions in which primary care residents participated in activities that occurred in community-based settings. The team analyzed studies with quantitative and qualitative results. They assessed study quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and assessed the quality of the community-engaged educational activity using a novel instrument called the Medical Education Engagement Quality Index (MEEQI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study team identified and reviewed the full texts of 29 articles (10 quantitative, 10 qualitative, and 9 quantitative and qualitative articles). Interventions included community engagement activities with varied settings, study length, and learning objectives. Outcomes included a change in attitudes, knowledge, skills, and career choices. The mean MERSQI score was 9.0 (range, 5.5-11.5), and the mean MEEQI score was 6.2 (range, 4.0-10.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The authors' findings revealed limited quality and substantial variability of the current literature. Future research should use more rigorous evaluation methods to determine which community-engaged curricular components can most effectively provide primary care resident physicians with the skills needed to provide high-quality primary care, particularly for vulnerable populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006123\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006123","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:社区参与的医疗方法,特别是初级保健,对促进健康是有效的。然而,关于确保医生接受充分培训以实践社区参与医学的最佳培训实践的证据有限,也没有达成共识。为了定义和确定如何填补这一空白,作者对初级保健住院医师培训项目中社区参与活动的文献进行了系统回顾。该研究旨在评估所研究干预措施的质量,并评估未来的研究需求。方法:在本系统综述中,研究小组使用与研究生医学教育、社区参与活动和潜在结果相关的关键搜索词检索PubMed、MEDLINE和PsycINFO。该团队选择并审查了截至2024年12月发表的所有英语文章,这些文章描述了初级保健居民参与社区环境中发生的活动的干预措施。该团队分析了定量和定性结果的研究。他们使用医学教育研究质量工具(MERSQI)评估研究质量,并使用一种称为医学教育参与质量指数(MEEQI)的新工具评估社区参与教育活动的质量。结果:研究小组识别并审阅了29篇文章全文(10篇定量文章,10篇定性文章,9篇定量和定性文章)。干预措施包括不同环境、学习时间和学习目标的社区参与活动。结果包括态度、知识、技能和职业选择的改变。MERSQI平均评分为9.0(范围5.5-11.5),MEEQI平均评分为6.2(范围4.0-10.0)。结论:作者的发现揭示了当前文献的有限质量和大量可变性。未来的研究应该使用更严格的评估方法来确定哪些社区参与的课程组成部分可以最有效地为初级保健住院医师提供提供高质量初级保健所需的技能,特别是对弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Training Toward Health Justice: A Review of Community-Engaged Training in Primary Care Residency Programs in the United States.

Purpose: A community-engaged approach to medicine, particularly primary care, is effective for health promotion. There is, however, limited evidence and no consensus on best training practices to ensure that physicians are trained adequately to practice community-engaged medicine. To define and determine how to fill this gap, the authors conducted a systematic review of literature on community-engaged activities in primary care resident training programs. The study sought to evaluate the quality of studied interventions and assess future research needs.

Method: For this systematic review, the study team searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO using key search terms related to graduate medical education, community engagement activities, and potential outcomes. The team selected and reviewed all English-language articles published through December 2024 that described interventions in which primary care residents participated in activities that occurred in community-based settings. The team analyzed studies with quantitative and qualitative results. They assessed study quality using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI) and assessed the quality of the community-engaged educational activity using a novel instrument called the Medical Education Engagement Quality Index (MEEQI).

Results: The study team identified and reviewed the full texts of 29 articles (10 quantitative, 10 qualitative, and 9 quantitative and qualitative articles). Interventions included community engagement activities with varied settings, study length, and learning objectives. Outcomes included a change in attitudes, knowledge, skills, and career choices. The mean MERSQI score was 9.0 (range, 5.5-11.5), and the mean MEEQI score was 6.2 (range, 4.0-10.0).

Conclusions: The authors' findings revealed limited quality and substantial variability of the current literature. Future research should use more rigorous evaluation methods to determine which community-engaged curricular components can most effectively provide primary care resident physicians with the skills needed to provide high-quality primary care, particularly for vulnerable populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信