佛兰德大学学生非医疗使用处方兴奋剂对学习成绩的社会规范干预的结果和过程评价:一项准实验研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Katleen Derickx, Hanna van Roozendaal, Koen Ponnet, Benedicte Deforche, Annelies Thienpondt, Guido Van Hal
{"title":"佛兰德大学学生非医疗使用处方兴奋剂对学习成绩的社会规范干预的结果和过程评价:一项准实验研究。","authors":"Katleen Derickx, Hanna van Roozendaal, Koen Ponnet, Benedicte Deforche, Annelies Thienpondt, Guido Van Hal","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01603-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students are increasingly engaging in the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) to enhance their study performance. However, little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce NMUPS. This study assessed the effect of a social norms approach (SNA) intervention on NMUPS and the perception of NMUPS for study performance among Flemish students. Additionally, a process evaluation of the intervention was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A social media campaign, containing social norm messages based on data from 'Head in the Clouds?' (HITC) survey edition 2021, ran from December 2022 to April 2023 at the University of Antwerp. Data from the HITC survey was also used as baseline measurement (Antwerp: n = 2,963, Ghent: n = 8,598). Afterward, a post-intervention survey was conducted among the students of the University of Antwerp (n = 1,827) and Ghent University (n = 3,333), the latter serving as the control group. A quantitative process evaluation among the intervention group was conducted according to the guidance of the Medical Research Council for process evaluation of complex interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A difference-in-difference approach showed that students of the intervention group at endline estimated NMUPS for study performance among peers significantly lower (P < .0001; Est. = -3.792; SE = 0.805)-and thus closer to the real social norm. There was no significant influence (P = 0.421; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.87 to -1.39) of the intervention on NMUPS for study performance. The process analysis showed that 18.7% of the intervention group had seen the campaign. Most of them found the campaign credible (83.6%) and clear (website: 90.8%; videos 94.7%; images: 92.4%). The overall satisfaction was 6.38 (SD 1.68) out of 10. Very few students (3.1%) had seen the campaign via TikTok, compared to Facebook (64.0%) and Instagram (53.3%), although 35.7% of the total budget had been spent on TikTok.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study confirm that an SNA intervention could reduce the misperceptions of NMUPS among students. However, the hypothesis that the behavior of NMUPS for study performance would be reduced subsequently could not be demonstrated. Follow-up research is needed to investigate long-term effects. The implementation of the intervention might be improved by making more optimal use of the campaign budget.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Katleen Derickx, Hanna van Roozendaal, Koen Ponnet, Benedicte Deforche, Annelies Thienpondt, Guido Van Hal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01603-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students are increasingly engaging in the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) to enhance their study performance. However, little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce NMUPS. This study assessed the effect of a social norms approach (SNA) intervention on NMUPS and the perception of NMUPS for study performance among Flemish students. Additionally, a process evaluation of the intervention was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A social media campaign, containing social norm messages based on data from 'Head in the Clouds?' (HITC) survey edition 2021, ran from December 2022 to April 2023 at the University of Antwerp. Data from the HITC survey was also used as baseline measurement (Antwerp: n = 2,963, Ghent: n = 8,598). Afterward, a post-intervention survey was conducted among the students of the University of Antwerp (n = 1,827) and Ghent University (n = 3,333), the latter serving as the control group. A quantitative process evaluation among the intervention group was conducted according to the guidance of the Medical Research Council for process evaluation of complex interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A difference-in-difference approach showed that students of the intervention group at endline estimated NMUPS for study performance among peers significantly lower (P < .0001; Est. = -3.792; SE = 0.805)-and thus closer to the real social norm. There was no significant influence (P = 0.421; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.87 to -1.39) of the intervention on NMUPS for study performance. The process analysis showed that 18.7% of the intervention group had seen the campaign. Most of them found the campaign credible (83.6%) and clear (website: 90.8%; videos 94.7%; images: 92.4%). The overall satisfaction was 6.38 (SD 1.68) out of 10. Very few students (3.1%) had seen the campaign via TikTok, compared to Facebook (64.0%) and Instagram (53.3%), although 35.7% of the total budget had been spent on TikTok.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study confirm that an SNA intervention could reduce the misperceptions of NMUPS among students. However, the hypothesis that the behavior of NMUPS for study performance would be reduced subsequently could not be demonstrated. Follow-up research is needed to investigate long-term effects. The implementation of the intervention might be improved by making more optimal use of the campaign budget.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12142950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01603-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01603-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:学生越来越多地从事非医疗使用处方兴奋剂(NMUPS),以提高他们的学习成绩。然而,对减少NMUPS的干预措施的有效性进行的研究很少。本研究评估了社会规范方法(SNA)干预对佛兰德学生NMUPS的影响,以及对NMUPS对学习成绩的感知。此外,还对干预措施进行了工艺评估。方法:一项社交媒体活动,包含基于“Head in the Clouds?”(HITC) 2021年版调查,于2022年12月至2023年4月在安特卫普大学进行。HITC调查的数据也被用作基线测量(安特卫普:n = 2963,根特:n = 8598)。随后,对安特卫普大学(n = 1827)和根特大学(n = 3333)的学生进行干预后调查,根特大学为对照组。根据美国医学研究理事会关于复杂干预措施过程评价的指导,对干预组进行定量过程评价。结论:本研究结果证实了SNA干预可以减少学生对NMUPS的误读。结论:SNA干预可以减少学生对NMUPS的误读。然而,NMUPS对学习表现的行为随后会降低的假设无法得到证明。需要后续研究来调查长期影响。通过更优化地利用竞选预算,可以改进干预措施的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.

Outcome and process evaluation of a social norms approach intervention on nonmedical use of prescription stimulants for study performance among Flemish university students: a quasi-experimental study.

Background: Students are increasingly engaging in the nonmedical use of prescription stimulants (NMUPS) to enhance their study performance. However, little research has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce NMUPS. This study assessed the effect of a social norms approach (SNA) intervention on NMUPS and the perception of NMUPS for study performance among Flemish students. Additionally, a process evaluation of the intervention was performed.

Methods: A social media campaign, containing social norm messages based on data from 'Head in the Clouds?' (HITC) survey edition 2021, ran from December 2022 to April 2023 at the University of Antwerp. Data from the HITC survey was also used as baseline measurement (Antwerp: n = 2,963, Ghent: n = 8,598). Afterward, a post-intervention survey was conducted among the students of the University of Antwerp (n = 1,827) and Ghent University (n = 3,333), the latter serving as the control group. A quantitative process evaluation among the intervention group was conducted according to the guidance of the Medical Research Council for process evaluation of complex interventions.

Results: A difference-in-difference approach showed that students of the intervention group at endline estimated NMUPS for study performance among peers significantly lower (P < .0001; Est. = -3.792; SE = 0.805)-and thus closer to the real social norm. There was no significant influence (P = 0.421; OR = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.87 to -1.39) of the intervention on NMUPS for study performance. The process analysis showed that 18.7% of the intervention group had seen the campaign. Most of them found the campaign credible (83.6%) and clear (website: 90.8%; videos 94.7%; images: 92.4%). The overall satisfaction was 6.38 (SD 1.68) out of 10. Very few students (3.1%) had seen the campaign via TikTok, compared to Facebook (64.0%) and Instagram (53.3%), although 35.7% of the total budget had been spent on TikTok.

Conclusions: The results of this study confirm that an SNA intervention could reduce the misperceptions of NMUPS among students. However, the hypothesis that the behavior of NMUPS for study performance would be reduced subsequently could not be demonstrated. Follow-up research is needed to investigate long-term effects. The implementation of the intervention might be improved by making more optimal use of the campaign budget.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信