Indra Ramakers, Riet Fonteyne, Marta Walentynowicz, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Maaike Van Den Houte, Katleen Bogaerts
{"title":"可控性和可预测性需求问卷(NCP-q):临床样本的心理测量特性和初步发现。","authors":"Indra Ramakers, Riet Fonteyne, Marta Walentynowicz, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Maaike Van Den Houte, Katleen Bogaerts","doi":"10.5114/hpr/195733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the importance of the need for controllability and predictability in the broad field of health psychology, a high-quality measurement tool for these constructs is required.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The objective of our study was to validate the Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q), which is a 15-item self-report measure that assesses an individual's need for controllability and predictability. In study 1, an exploratory (<i>n</i> = 464) and confirmatory (<i>n</i> = 304) factor analysis was performed in two student convenience samples. In study 2, NCP-q data of patients with panic disorder (<i>n</i> = 34), stress-related syndromes (overstrain, <i>n</i> = 33; burnout, <i>n</i> = 39), functional somatic syndromes (fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome, <i>n</i> = 34), and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 30) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from study 1 suggest that the NCP-q should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The NCP-q has excellent internal consistency and an acceptable four-week test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated. Study 2 revealed significantly higher NCP-q scores for all patient groups compared to healthy controls, but no differences between patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher self-reported need for controllability and predictability can be seen as a transdiagnostic underlying mechanism of different patient groups characterized by experiencing physical symptoms in daily life. The NCP-q can be used as a reliable, concise, and clinically relevant research tool and may contribute to identifying relevant underlying mechanisms in different patient samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"13 2","pages":"201-214"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q): psychometric properties and preliminary findings in a clinical sample.\",\"authors\":\"Indra Ramakers, Riet Fonteyne, Marta Walentynowicz, Lukas Van Oudenhove, Maaike Van Den Houte, Katleen Bogaerts\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/hpr/195733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Given the importance of the need for controllability and predictability in the broad field of health psychology, a high-quality measurement tool for these constructs is required.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The objective of our study was to validate the Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q), which is a 15-item self-report measure that assesses an individual's need for controllability and predictability. In study 1, an exploratory (<i>n</i> = 464) and confirmatory (<i>n</i> = 304) factor analysis was performed in two student convenience samples. In study 2, NCP-q data of patients with panic disorder (<i>n</i> = 34), stress-related syndromes (overstrain, <i>n</i> = 33; burnout, <i>n</i> = 39), functional somatic syndromes (fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome, <i>n</i> = 34), and healthy controls (<i>n</i> = 30) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results from study 1 suggest that the NCP-q should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The NCP-q has excellent internal consistency and an acceptable four-week test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated. Study 2 revealed significantly higher NCP-q scores for all patient groups compared to healthy controls, but no differences between patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A higher self-reported need for controllability and predictability can be seen as a transdiagnostic underlying mechanism of different patient groups characterized by experiencing physical symptoms in daily life. The NCP-q can be used as a reliable, concise, and clinically relevant research tool and may contribute to identifying relevant underlying mechanisms in different patient samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Report\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"201-214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12140159/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/195733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/195733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q): psychometric properties and preliminary findings in a clinical sample.
Background: Given the importance of the need for controllability and predictability in the broad field of health psychology, a high-quality measurement tool for these constructs is required.
Participants and procedure: The objective of our study was to validate the Need for Controllability and Predictability questionnaire (NCP-q), which is a 15-item self-report measure that assesses an individual's need for controllability and predictability. In study 1, an exploratory (n = 464) and confirmatory (n = 304) factor analysis was performed in two student convenience samples. In study 2, NCP-q data of patients with panic disorder (n = 34), stress-related syndromes (overstrain, n = 33; burnout, n = 39), functional somatic syndromes (fibromyalgia and/or chronic fatigue syndrome, n = 34), and healthy controls (n = 30) were compared.
Results: The results from study 1 suggest that the NCP-q should be used as a one-dimensional instrument. The NCP-q has excellent internal consistency and an acceptable four-week test-retest reliability. Convergent validity was demonstrated. Study 2 revealed significantly higher NCP-q scores for all patient groups compared to healthy controls, but no differences between patient groups.
Conclusions: A higher self-reported need for controllability and predictability can be seen as a transdiagnostic underlying mechanism of different patient groups characterized by experiencing physical symptoms in daily life. The NCP-q can be used as a reliable, concise, and clinically relevant research tool and may contribute to identifying relevant underlying mechanisms in different patient samples.